Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for comment

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Requests for comment
Revision as of 18:40, 16 June 2006 by Spencerian (talk | contribs) (Comments on RFC)

I object to this because this was not voted nor discussed. --Shane (T - C - E) 15:03, 20 March 2006 (CST)

The procedure is borrowed from Wikipedia, where it works very well. --Peter Farago 16:50, 20 March 2006 (CST)
So this is not Wikipedia as it was pointed before. We can do this all night until I need to go to bed, but I don't care. As long as my point gets accross that you are the only one who has a problem with me. No one yet has suppored your claim because they don't belive your correct and we been doing this back and forth for a while now. --Shane (T - C - E) 19:40, 20 March 2006 (CST)
So are portals. --Shane (T - C - E) 18:02, 20 March 2006 (CST)
I'm not objecting to portals. I'm objecting to you. --Peter Farago 18:16, 20 March 2006 (CST)
So you mind that I am taking on the project instead of yourself? Make up your mind. --Shane (T - C - E) 18:46, 20 March 2006 (CST)
I've made my objections quite plain at Battlestar Wiki talk:Portals. The fact that you have ignored them is the purpose of this RFC. --Peter Farago 18:49, 20 March 2006 (CST)
Make up your mind. First it's you don't like the Portal system idea now you are syaing you are all up for it, but you have a problem with me working on it. I didn't have a problem with anyone until you objected to me working on it. Everyone else liked the idea who is not an administrator because they are the people who visit the site the most. --Shane (T - C - E) 18:51, 20 March 2006 (CST)
Shane, in all honesty, I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. If anyone else needs me to clarify myself, I will be happy to do so at Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for comment/Shane. --Peter Farago 19:25, 20 March 2006 (CST)

Since Shane himself, despite his initial objections to the use of RFCs, has submitted not one, but two RFCs recently (neither gaining the sufficient minimum acceptance, to my knowledge), there appears to be no further commentary on the matter of the use of RFCs at this time. Further changes to the use of RFCs should be added here, but as a new topic. --Spencerian 13:40, 16 June 2006 (CDT)