Battlestar Wiki:Requests for comment/Shane (old)

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
Revision as of 06:16, 11 April 2020 by April Arcus (talk | contribs) (gender inclusive language)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please Note
This page is an archive of a failed RFC. It has been temporarily restored as evidence for the duration of Battlestar Wiki:Requests for comment/Shane.

&tIn order to remain listed at Battlestar Wiki:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ;nowiki>April Arcus 18:36, 25 June 2006 (CDT)</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 04:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC).

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

"Shane has continued massive series of edits on his portal pages and other templates without allowing discussion to proceed properly. Current discussion on Battlestar Wiki talk:Portals has been ignored, as have private communications.

Evidence of disputed behavior

c.f. Battlestar Wiki talk:Portals, User talk:Shane.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. April Arcus 14:31, 20 March 2006 (CST)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)


This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

Listen. You all want a detailed response and what the goal is of the Portal's? Well.. you win. It will be three pages long, in a PDF document. Now since I am a little busy for time these past few days (more like 7) and in the next few days I do not have time to post it. I have not have time to post anything or type anything of that nature first because the ammount of working I am doing to try and get a job that I love and want to do, I have to put more time into that than anything and for that I can not have a Portal "Goals" and Reaosn for why. I will NOT tell you want my job is, and I can not post that here in the public domain of the web, but for reasons understanding, I can not have it posted bceause it's a risk and I can't take that risk. I am sure that you understand that this is a hobbby. I will tell you one thing, It's better to expain something for when you have an exmaple than none at all. For once April, open your eyes and see why things have to be created. It's like you wouldn't try a Car unless you know it felt good on the road. this is the same concept. Here is at the bottom where i had a little intro summary in which you negleted to look at. I suggest you comment here, as where it's been the entire time. --Shane (T - C - E) 14:57, 20 March 2006 (CST)

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):


All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.