Battlestar Wiki:Quality Articles: Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Project|Quality Article}}  
{{Project|Quality Article}}  
{{projectimage|BSG WIKI Quality Article.png}}
{{projectimage|BSG WIKI Proposed Quality Article.png}}


== Criteria for a Quality Article ==
== Criteria for a Quality Article ==
Line 10: Line 13:


The following '''do not''' qualify as Quality Article candidates:
The following '''do not''' qualify as Quality Article candidates:
* [[Battlestar Wiki:Find or fix a stub|stubs]],
* [[Battlestar Wiki:Find or fix a stub|Stubs]]
* talk pages,
* Talk pages
* anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace, and
* Anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace
* past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked.
* Past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked.


== Identifying a Potential Quality Article ==
== Identifying a Potential Quality Article ==

Revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2006

This page is one of Battlestar Wiki's many projects.
This page serves to coordinate discussion on a particular aspect of this Wiki. The formal recommendations of a project may be treated as policies.




Criteria for a Quality Article

A quality article should have the following attributes:

The following do not qualify as Quality Article candidates:

  • Stubs
  • Talk pages
  • Anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace
  • Past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked.

Identifying a Potential Quality Article

Quality Articles should be identified as such, so that a master list can be created. If you think an article should be a featured article on the front page, submit it first as {{quality article}}.

Essentially, this would be done in the following way:

  1. A contributor tags an article page with {{quality candidate}}, then adds a note to the corresponding article's talk page explaining their reasoning.
  2. Involved members of the community will then discuss the candidate article. Typically, they should be as critical as possible.
  3. If the consensus is that the article is of potential quality, then the discussion will evolve into modifying the article in such a way as to polish the article so as to achieve full "Quality Article" status.
  4. Once this is done, the article will be tagged {{quality article}}.