https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Usmarox 2026-04-24T15:50:51Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.45.1 https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:You_Can%27t_Go_Home_Again/Archive_1&diff=38365 2006-03-14T22:11:07Z

<p>Usmarox: Slight Terminological Inexactitude</p> <hr /> <div>I find it remarkable, that Helo gets actually 'betrayed' by a chrome toaster...<br /> <br /> :[[Toaster]]s are crafty beasts. Oh, to sign your comments next time, Xbruce, place four tildes (~) after your comment. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:46, 13 February 2006 (EST)<br /> <br /> :: Sorry, didn't know that there already was a page about ze evil toasters! I'll tilt in the future! [[User:Xbruce|Xbruce]] 04:28, 14 February 2006 (EST)<br /> <br /> == Slight Terminological Inexactitude ==<br /> <br /> Ummm...<br /> <br /> Reading the comments, I noticed that the Viper's increased fuel consumption is attributed to the fact the moon where Starbuck lands has an O2-free atmosphere, but I'm sure that isn't right.<br /> <br /> Unless I'm mistaken, the reason they go through so much JP is because in space, the Viper just stays where it is. The only time a Viper in space burns fuel is to accelerate, brake or change direction. In an atmosphere, the Viper has to burn fuel *just to stay up*.<br /> <br /> Which brings us on to the parallel question of how they fly in a low/no-O2 atmosphere. Either tyllium isn't a combustion fuel, or smallcraft have internal LOX tanks for this sort of thing.</div>

Usmarox