<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Swozie</id>
	<title>Battlestar Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Swozie"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Special:Contributions/Swozie"/>
	<updated>2026-04-25T22:06:58Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=147057</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=147057"/>
		<updated>2008-01-08T22:26:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then just add the &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; in the text and all is good (I&#039;ll do so, but I think the entry paragraph also needs to be changed, and am currently thinking about that). Something like &amp;quot;reportedly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; also works will with things that are told second-hand :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m pretty sure &amp;quot;threw herself to the rocks&amp;quot; does mean death, y&#039;know. [[User:OTW|OTW]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah. Depends on if he takes issue with the wording (which is clear though), or that it&#039;s just scriptures that might not be true. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that whatever the show states has to be considered true, its true that the show states it, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s true within the BSG universe itsself but I don&#039;t think this site can be concerned with that since we can&#039;t possibly know. Athena killing herself isn&#039;t true because the show doesn&#039;t state it, its just presumed (and probably correctly presumed) but adding the word &amp;quot;presumed&amp;quot; would mean that there is no chance that what you are stating can possibly be wrong which only adds to the validity of information on this site. Besides if Athena is a god then presumably she can&#039;t die.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 14:05, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is either the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood OR the nova or perhaps both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Major, look. It&#039;s the mandala from the Temple. This is supposed to be happening. That&#039;s it. I was staring at it the whole time. The sun is going nova. The nova is the Eye of Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Roslin believes that the Eye is inside the temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Admiral, if the Eye of Jupiter is somewhere in that temple, and it really is a marker o­n the way to Earth… We can&#039;t let the Cylons get their hands o­n it. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 13:57, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:According to those episodes, the Thirteenth Tribe saw a nova in the Ionian system and drew that nova in the temple. This would make the nova the &#039;original&#039; Eye, and the symbol in the temple a depiction of it. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:20, 8 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps, the scriptures say it was left in the temple...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Episode 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: I don&#039;t know, Lee. I&#039;ve looked at the Scriptures, and they make reference to the Eye being left in some sort of temple. But there&#039;s no physical description.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:25, 8 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=147056</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=147056"/>
		<updated>2008-01-08T22:25:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then just add the &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; in the text and all is good (I&#039;ll do so, but I think the entry paragraph also needs to be changed, and am currently thinking about that). Something like &amp;quot;reportedly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; also works will with things that are told second-hand :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m pretty sure &amp;quot;threw herself to the rocks&amp;quot; does mean death, y&#039;know. [[User:OTW|OTW]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah. Depends on if he takes issue with the wording (which is clear though), or that it&#039;s just scriptures that might not be true. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that whatever the show states has to be considered true, its true that the show states it, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s true within the BSG universe itsself but I don&#039;t think this site can be concerned with that since we can&#039;t possibly know. Athena killing herself isn&#039;t true because the show doesn&#039;t state it, its just presumed (and probably correctly presumed) but adding the word &amp;quot;presumed&amp;quot; would mean that there is no chance that what you are stating can possibly be wrong which only adds to the validity of information on this site. Besides if Athena is a god then presumably she can&#039;t die.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 14:05, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is either the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood OR the nova or perhaps both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Major, look. It&#039;s the mandala from the Temple. This is supposed to be happening. That&#039;s it. I was staring at it the whole time. The sun is going nova. The nova is the Eye of Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Roslin believes that the Eye is inside the temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Admiral, if the Eye of Jupiter is somewhere in that temple, and it really is a marker o­n the way to Earth… We can&#039;t let the Cylons get their hands o­n it. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 13:57, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:According to those episodes, the Thirteenth Tribe saw a nova in the Ionian system and drew that nova in the temple. This would make the nova the &#039;original&#039; Eye, and the symbol in the temple a depiction of it. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:20, 8 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sciptures say it was left in the temple...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Episode 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: I don&#039;t know, Lee. I&#039;ve looked at the Scriptures, and they make reference to the Eye being left in some sort of temple. But there&#039;s no physical description.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:25, 8 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146894</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146894"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T20:05:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then just add the &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; in the text and all is good (I&#039;ll do so, but I think the entry paragraph also needs to be changed, and am currently thinking about that). Something like &amp;quot;reportedly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; also works will with things that are told second-hand :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m pretty sure &amp;quot;threw herself to the rocks&amp;quot; does mean death, y&#039;know. [[User:OTW|OTW]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah. Depends on if he takes issue with the wording (which is clear though), or that it&#039;s just scriptures that might not be true. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that whatever the show states has to be considered true, its true that the show states it, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s true within the BSG universe itsself but I don&#039;t think this site can be concerned with that since we can&#039;t possibly know. Athena killing herself isn&#039;t true because the show doesn&#039;t state it, its just presumed (and probably correctly presumed) but adding the word &amp;quot;presumed&amp;quot; would mean that there is no chance that what you are stating can possibly be wrong which only adds to the validity of information on this site. Besides if Athena is a god then presumably she can&#039;t die.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 14:05, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is either the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood OR the nova or perhaps both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Major, look. It&#039;s the mandala from the Temple. This is supposed to be happening. That&#039;s it. I was staring at it the whole time. The sun is going nova. The nova is the Eye of Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Roslin believes that the Eye is inside the temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Admiral, if the Eye of Jupiter is somewhere in that temple, and it really is a marker o­n the way to Earth… We can&#039;t let the Cylons get their hands o­n it. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 13:57, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146892</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146892"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T19:57:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then just add the &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; in the text and all is good (I&#039;ll do so, but I think the entry paragraph also needs to be changed, and am currently thinking about that). Something like &amp;quot;reportedly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; also works will with things that are told second-hand :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m pretty sure &amp;quot;threw herself to the rocks&amp;quot; does mean death, y&#039;know. [[User:OTW|OTW]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah. Depends on if he takes issue with the wording (which is clear though), or that it&#039;s just scriptures that might not be true. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is either the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood OR the nova or perhaps both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Major, look. It&#039;s the mandala from the Temple. This is supposed to be happening. That&#039;s it. I was staring at it the whole time. The sun is going nova. The nova is the Eye of Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Roslin believes that the Eye is inside the temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Admiral, if the Eye of Jupiter is somewhere in that temple, and it really is a marker o­n the way to Earth… We can&#039;t let the Cylons get their hands o­n it. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 13:57, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146891</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146891"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T19:50:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then just add the &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; in the text and all is good (I&#039;ll do so, but I think the entry paragraph also needs to be changed, and am currently thinking about that). Something like &amp;quot;reportedly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; also works will with things that are told second-hand :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m pretty sure &amp;quot;threw herself to the rocks&amp;quot; does mean death, y&#039;know. [[User:OTW|OTW]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah. Depends on if he takes issue with the wording (which is clear though), or that it&#039;s just scriptures that might not be true. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is either the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood OR the nova or perhaps both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Major, look. It&#039;s the mandala from the Temple. This is supposed to be happening. That&#039;s it. I was staring at it the whole time. The sun is going nova. The nova is the Eye of Jupiter.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Pythia&amp;diff=146884</id>
		<title>Pythia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Pythia&amp;diff=146884"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T18:55:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&#039;&#039;For information on the religious writings in the [[Original Series]], see [[Kobollian Faith]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pythia.jpg|thumb|right|A closeup of the Book of Pythia.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Pythia&#039;&#039;&#039; was an ancient human [[oracle]], believed to have been one of the writers of the [[Sacred Scrolls]], some 3,600 years prior to the events of the [[Miniseries]] and the [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies|destruction]] of the [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)|Twelve Colonies of Kobol]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pythia&#039;s writings are both obscure and yet well-known: obscure, in that her entire writings are not widely studied among modern Colonials, but well-known in that extracts are widely quoted, often out of context, such as the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;All this has happened before. All this will happen again.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is actually the opening from &amp;quot;[[wikipedia:Peter Pan (1953 film)|Peter Pan]]&amp;quot;, which [[Ron D. Moore]] cites as his source. {{cite_rdm_podcast|episode=Frak Party Q and A|act=|id=peterpan|timestamp=23:28|totalrunning=78:27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key to Pythia&#039;s writings are two passages, relating to the exile and rebirth of the human race:&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;And the Lords anointed a leader to guide the caravan of the heavens to their new homeland. And unto the leader, they gave a vision of serpents, numbering two and ten, as a sign of things to come.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President [[Laura Roslin]], while giving a press briefing 36 days into the flight of the surviving Colonials, had a [[Chamalla|hallucination]] that her podium showed two snakes crawling on it, and then a dozen ([[The Hand of God (RDM)|The Hand of God]]). Additionally, Pythia wrote that the anointed leader had a &amp;quot;wasting illness&amp;quot; and would not live to enter the new land; Roslin is dying of cancer at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the second passage, Pythia foretells of an initial battle in which the Colonials are &amp;quot;lead by serpents two and ten&amp;quot; and are victorious over their foes. During their flight from the [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]], the Colonials are forced to attack a Cylon base in order to obtain [[tylium|fuel]]. The attack is lead by twelve [[Viper (RDM)|Vipers]] (&#039;&#039;The Hand of God&#039;&#039;). However, Pythia&#039;s writings on the battle fortells it leading to a larger confrontation, this time &amp;quot;at the [[Kobol (RDM)|home of the Gods]].&amp;quot; ([[The Hand of God (RDM)|The Hand of God]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Ron Moore on 8/26/2005 -- There used to be a Cylon attack after this whole thing with Sharon went down. The centurions came and attacked during the upcoming planetarium sequence. And we eventually cut that... We changed this very moment right here, where Adama gets the gun. It was a late change in the editing room. Originally he took that gun and put it to Sharon&#039;s head. And we were playing the beat of will he shoot Sharon or not. And then we just made that lift within the last week, so it plays out more emotionally here, instead of putting another gun to another person&#039;s head. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings of Pythia appear to have particular interest to the Cylons. [[Leoben Conoy]] used quotes from Pythia during his interrogation, and goes on to point out to [[Kara Thrace]] that while her people kneel before idols, &amp;quot;You don&#039;t realise your destiny has already been written&amp;quot; &amp;amp;mdash; another reference to Pythia&#039;s foretelling of the exile ([[Flesh and Bone]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear, particularly in the context of &amp;quot;all this has happened before&amp;quot; if Pythia is writing history which repeats, or prophecy or both.  Her writings are always in the past tense, and some phrases clearly refer to past events (the journey to Earth) while in other instances it is said she has &amp;quot;foretold&amp;quot; events.  However, text from the book of Pythia is used to help locate the [[Tomb of Athena]] which is alleged to be constructed during the great exodus 1,600 years after her writing. ([[Home, Part II]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Greek Parallels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pythia was a Sibyl, the [[Wikipedia:Pythia|Oracle of Delphi]]. While the temple at [[Wikipedia:Delphi|Delphi]] was closely identified with [[Wikipedia:Gaia_mythology|Gaia]], the mother of Earth (and responsible for laying the foundations for the Olympian gods), Delphi itself had a close association with Apollo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roman Parallels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[w:Sibylline Books|Sibylline Books]] or Sibyllae were a collection of oracular utterances, set out in Greek hexameters, purchased from a &#039;&#039;[[w:Sibyl|sibylla]]&#039;&#039;, meaning &#039;&#039;prophetess&#039;&#039; in Greek, by the last king of Rome, [[w:Lucius Tarquinius Superbus|Tarquinius Superbus]]. These books were consulted at momentous crises through the history of Rome and only fragments have survived, the rest being lost or deliberately destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sibylline Books should not be confused with the so-called Sibylline Oracles, twelve books of prophesies thought to be of Judaeo-Christian origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sacred Scrolls]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religion in the Twelve Colonies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dodona Selloi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{ext-wikipedia|article = Pythia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:85%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:A to Z|Pythia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Characters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Characters (RDM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mentioned-Only Characters (RDM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial History (RDM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RDM]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Pythia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146874</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146874"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T17:36:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Eye of Jupiter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that &amp;quot;The Eye of Jupiter is, in fact, the image created by the planet&#039;s dying sun&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the Eye Of Jupiter is the emblem on the floor of the Temple on which D&#039;Anna stood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Six appears, indicating the obvious Eye symbol o­n the floor.]&lt;br /&gt;
Chip Six: There it is, Gaius. It has the answers to all of your questions. &lt;br /&gt;
Baltar: That&#039;s the Eye? --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 11:36, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146873</id>
		<title>Talk:Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thirteenth_Tribe_(RDM)/Archive_1&amp;diff=146873"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T17:28:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Was there ever actually a thirteenth tribe? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the existence of the thirteenth tribe is unfounded speculation.   Now how can I say this when it is regularly referred to in the show?  The show does not show a thirteenth tribe.  Rather it shows people who talk about an ancient legend of a thirteenth tribe.   I made some minor edits in the past to try to make it more ambiguous but the truth is this article still describes the thirteenth tribe as though it is a real tribe seen in the show, and it isn&#039;t.  It&#039;s a myth from the scrolls, which may or may not turn out to be real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As most fans know, there is much controversy over whether Earth was colonized by Kobol&#039;s thirteenth tribe as the scrolls say, or Kobol was colonized by Earth.  I don&#039;t want to try to resolve or speculate on that controversy in the main page, though I certainly have [http://ideas.4brad.com/earth-bsg my own arguments, which I believe are fairly convincing].  I believe that this article, and a few related ones, currently speculate on the controversy, but in the &amp;quot;trust the myths&amp;quot; direction.   There are hints scattered through the articles about the uncertainty regarding the legend, I would like to consolidate it, perhaps by gathering the material from the scrolls in a section marked &amp;quot;As told in the sacred scrolls&amp;quot; with another section for relevant notes and facts outside the scrolls from canon/etc.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 03:22, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The article says &amp;quot;according to Elosha&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;according to the Scriptures&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;apparently&amp;quot; pretty much every time. That&#039;s enough for me. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, 17 April 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Athena&#039;s Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article says that Athena killed herself, her death is an assumption since all that we know is what Boomer tells us...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn&#039;t say that she died.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146822</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146822"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T14:33:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your just getting confused with &amp;quot;13th tribe&amp;quot; which reference one tribe, and &amp;quot;13 tribes&amp;quot; which references all 13.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that if it happened that way, then the knowledge of where the 13th tribe went would be with the twelve colonies (since people who had been to earth would be among the twelve colonies). The tribes always have seemed to correspond to the colonies, so having a thirteenth in the mix would upset the pattern. What&#039;s really affecting my thinking (and likely the thinking of others) is the way the exodus pattern unfolded in TOS. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:24, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The knowledge IS with the 12 colonies, the constellation map, the knowledge of the Temple, the chronical of the original journey also bear in mind that when the 13th colony got to Earth, the other 12 tribes were (according to RON MOORE) considered &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 08:29, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146820</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146820"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T14:32:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your just getting confused with &amp;quot;13th tribe&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;13 tribes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that if it happened that way, then the knowledge of where the 13th tribe went would be with the twelve colonies (since people who had been to earth would be among the twelve colonies). The tribes always have seemed to correspond to the colonies, so having a thirteenth in the mix would upset the pattern. What&#039;s really affecting my thinking (and likely the thinking of others) is the way the exodus pattern unfolded in TOS. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:24, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The knowledge IS with the 12 colonies, the constellation map, the knowledge of the Temple, the chronical of the original journey also bear in mind that when the 13th colony got to Earth, the other 12 tribes were (according to RON MOORE) considered &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 08:29, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146818</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146818"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T14:29:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your just getting confused with &amp;quot;13th tribe&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;13 tribes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that if it happened that way, then the knowledge of where the 13th tribe went would be with the twelve colonies (since people who had been to earth would be among the twelve colonies). The tribes always have seemed to correspond to the colonies, so having a thirteenth in the mix would upset the pattern. What&#039;s really affecting my thinking (and likely the thinking of others) is the way the exodus pattern unfolded in TOS. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:24, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You just proved my point - the knowledge IS with the 12 colonies, the constellation map, the knowledge of the Temple, the chronical of the original journey--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 08:29, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146816</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146816"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T13:53:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your just getting confused with &amp;quot;13th tribe&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;13 tribes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146815</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146815"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T13:43:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script and has no contradictions.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146814</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146814"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T13:37:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they&#039;re legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can&#039;t seem to keep their dates straight (whether it&#039;s 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RON MOORE COMMENTARY	&lt;br /&gt;
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here&#039;s the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t read much into Adama&#039;s 3000 year quote since he says &amp;quot;over 3000&amp;quot; years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can&#039;t really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
You also agree that at some point &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Got to Earth &lt;br /&gt;
2. Named the constellations after their &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; brothers&lt;br /&gt;
3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 years: The &amp;quot;reunited&amp;quot; 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions and assumes no errors in the script.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146810</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146810"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T13:15:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146809</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146809"/>
		<updated>2008-01-07T13:15:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The 13th Tribe &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;&#039; left Kobol&amp;quot; 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now &#039;&#039;that&#039;s&#039;&#039; a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It&#039;s possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They don&#039;t say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don&#039;t believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boomer: I&#039;m putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I&#039;m right, that&#039;s the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146645</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146645"/>
		<updated>2008-01-06T13:43:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial &lt;br /&gt;
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;first&amp;quot;, also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren&#039;t neccessarily saying the the legendary &amp;quot;Thirteeth Tribe&amp;quot; was one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n &lt;br /&gt;
its way to Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the use of the term &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years &lt;br /&gt;
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple&#039;s at least 4,000 years &lt;br /&gt;
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146526</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146526"/>
		<updated>2008-01-06T01:54:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How crucial it is depends on one&#039;s preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that&#039;s what footnotes are for. It&#039;s true that it should be left somewhat open, and it&#039;s a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in &#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039; order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can&#039;t be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that&#039;s said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Billy: Uh, well, we won&#039;t know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. &lt;br /&gt;
Elosha: That&#039;s around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146525</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146525"/>
		<updated>2008-01-06T01:49:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your recent change is better but you say &amp;quot;at least 200 years&amp;quot; and this could mean 200 to million years or more which obviously isnt what Cottle says - just change it to &amp;quot;couple hundred&amp;quot; years as Cottle says!! {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Swozie, please calm down. You say you &amp;quot;can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change&amp;quot;, but you&#039;re the one making the fuss here. &amp;quot;A couple of ...&amp;quot; is generally meant as &amp;quot;a few ...&amp;quot;, not exactly 2. Ask anyone, they&#039;ll agree. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It simply does not mean &#039;&#039;exactly&#039;&#039; two years. Yeah, I&#039;m making too much of a fuss about it and it&#039;s annoying me too. Removing it was probably jumping the gun; sorry. I can add a footnote about Cottle&#039;s dialogue, but it&#039;s really pretty clear how he means it. But I could also say that you want your interpretation of facts noted. This cuts both ways. There are an awful lot of theories about things floating around and it&#039;s impossible to give room to everything, so we either eliminate speculation entirely or try to stick to the most sensible interpretations until something is clarified. Again, the best place for this stuff is the Analysis section of the episode pages. They usually have room to write more a bit more about something and are also read by many people. It&#039;s also ideal for challenging &amp;quot;preconceptions&amp;quot; with new ideas as long as they&#039;re not too outlandish (like some of the stuff on the Final Five, Earth, etc. that can be found on forums).&lt;br /&gt;
:Btw, please sign your comments with four tildes: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. There is also a quick link below the edit box for it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:17, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I am calm! I just didn&#039;t think it was in line with the timeline if I had written &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; where all the other items are listed with numbers. So do you suggest I talk about changes before making them in the future?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:38, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don&#039;t think that will be necessary, unless you&#039;re planning to rewrite half an article. If it&#039;s a little thing like this, just make the change, and someone will spot it and undo it if they think it&#039;s wrong. Please don&#039;t be discouraged by the fact that one of your first edits was met by controversy: that&#039;s just bad luck. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:44, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, it was fine. Usually things don&#039;t spiral out of control like this. :s Of course I could have opened a discussion before removing it, but that&#039;s really the same problem. There a few approximate dates on the page with &amp;quot;ca.&amp;quot;, so they don&#039;t all have to be exact. If something isn&#039;t clear, they just have a footnote with the source or reasoning. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:50, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok cool well before I make any more changes I need you to clarify what you interpret as speculation. The cylons not having immunity &amp;quot;implies&amp;quot; that they are based on material that is at least a &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; hundred years old. Simon even says that they are all based on material from the same genetic pool. Now I appreciate this can lead to wild theories but I don&#039;t see it as speculation, its logical deduction, whether you believe it or not is another matter. However the same page talks about &amp;quot;at some unlisted time, travel occured from Earth to Kobol (because of the constellation map)&amp;quot;. This is no different, the evidence implies travel from Earth to Kobol, its never stated as fact its just deduced.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 17:11, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Cylons&#039; genetic pool doesn&#039;t need to be hundreds of years old. They probably made some modifications to human DNA (since they&#039;re different from humans), which could have accidentally removed the immunity. The Cylons&#039; inability to breed could have a similar cause. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:18, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly my point - you are speculating, having to make up something to suppport your preconceived ideas of the show.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 06:02, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Again, the same could be said about you. One reason why I was hesitant to include that part is because hardly anyone will make a connection to the creation of the humanoid Cylons. Having it there is certainly more unfounded speculation than not as it hints at an assumed connection. As said, it&#039;s something for episode analysis, or simply the question section. Like &amp;quot;Is the date of the viral infection a hint towards the Cylons&#039; age?&amp;quot;. That points people at the information without really stating anything. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:12, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Having watched this conversation, I happen to agree. The Timeline is the wrong place for this kind of speculation, which should be limited to the episode guide (whether as a question or analysis point). As for the point about the constellations, it&#039;s common sense that the constellations (as depicted in &amp;quot;Home, Part II&amp;quot; can only be seen from Earth in those configurations, otherwise they would either be reversed or otherwise distorted). -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:26, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the hell are you lot talking about!! I mention putting a fact in the timeline, a fact that is mentioned in the show, thats it, THE FACT, this is a site for facts yes? Thats all there is to it, who cares about what the reader might read into it, thats up to the reader not you - you dont not list a fact because your worried readers might read too much into it, thats up to them not you. What you doing is restricting facts that you don&#039;t feel appropriate - does this give you some sort of power trip, excercising some cheap form of mind control? Oh I am calm - but its a shame because this site is great, there is alot of work put into it that by like minded individuals but it has an awful lot of assumptions written into it, its almost like you can&#039;t add anything if it hints in anyway to a story line that doesnt conform to your preconceived ideas of what the show is about, in short its your own personal view on BSG and not the objective view that I thought it was, I got the wrong idea of the purpose of this site and I apologize for that, good luck with all your hard work in the future --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:49, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146411</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146411"/>
		<updated>2008-01-05T12:02:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your recent change is better but you say &amp;quot;at least 200 years&amp;quot; and this could mean 200 to million years or more which obviously isnt what Cottle says - just change it to &amp;quot;couple hundred&amp;quot; years as Cottle says!! {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Swozie, please calm down. You say you &amp;quot;can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change&amp;quot;, but you&#039;re the one making the fuss here. &amp;quot;A couple of ...&amp;quot; is generally meant as &amp;quot;a few ...&amp;quot;, not exactly 2. Ask anyone, they&#039;ll agree. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It simply does not mean &#039;&#039;exactly&#039;&#039; two years. Yeah, I&#039;m making too much of a fuss about it and it&#039;s annoying me too. Removing it was probably jumping the gun; sorry. I can add a footnote about Cottle&#039;s dialogue, but it&#039;s really pretty clear how he means it. But I could also say that you want your interpretation of facts noted. This cuts both ways. There are an awful lot of theories about things floating around and it&#039;s impossible to give room to everything, so we either eliminate speculation entirely or try to stick to the most sensible interpretations until something is clarified. Again, the best place for this stuff is the Analysis section of the episode pages. They usually have room to write more a bit more about something and are also read by many people. It&#039;s also ideal for challenging &amp;quot;preconceptions&amp;quot; with new ideas as long as they&#039;re not too outlandish (like some of the stuff on the Final Five, Earth, etc. that can be found on forums).&lt;br /&gt;
:Btw, please sign your comments with four tildes: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. There is also a quick link below the edit box for it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:17, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I am calm! I just didn&#039;t think it was in line with the timeline if I had written &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; where all the other items are listed with numbers. So do you suggest I talk about changes before making them in the future?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:38, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don&#039;t think that will be necessary, unless you&#039;re planning to rewrite half an article. If it&#039;s a little thing like this, just make the change, and someone will spot it and undo it if they think it&#039;s wrong. Please don&#039;t be discouraged by the fact that one of your first edits was met by controversy: that&#039;s just bad luck. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:44, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, it was fine. Usually things don&#039;t spiral out of control like this. :s Of course I could have opened a discussion before removing it, but that&#039;s really the same problem. There a few approximate dates on the page with &amp;quot;ca.&amp;quot;, so they don&#039;t all have to be exact. If something isn&#039;t clear, they just have a footnote with the source or reasoning. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:50, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok cool well before I make any more changes I need you to clarify what you interpret as speculation. The cylons not having immunity &amp;quot;implies&amp;quot; that they are based on material that is at least a &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; hundred years old. Simon even says that they are all based on material from the same genetic pool. Now I appreciate this can lead to wild theories but I don&#039;t see it as speculation, its logical deduction, whether you believe it or not is another matter. However the same page talks about &amp;quot;at some unlisted time, travel occured from Earth to Kobol (because of the constellation map)&amp;quot;. This is no different, the evidence implies travel from Earth to Kobol, its never stated as fact its just deduced.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 17:11, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Cylons&#039; genetic pool doesn&#039;t need to be hundreds of years old. They probably made some modifications to human DNA (since they&#039;re different from humans), which could have accidentally removed the immunity. The Cylons&#039; inability to breed could have a similar cause. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:18, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly my point - you are speculating, having to make up something to suppport your preconceived ideas of the show.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 06:02, 5 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146328</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146328"/>
		<updated>2008-01-05T00:53:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146327</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146327"/>
		<updated>2008-01-05T00:49:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and any the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146326</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146326"/>
		<updated>2008-01-05T00:48:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren&#039;t written into the description of events and any the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146316</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146316"/>
		<updated>2008-01-05T00:09:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146311</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146311"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T23:50:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Adama to Roslin &amp;quot;According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote Tyrol to Adama &amp;quot;Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that it reads as follows...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4000 - 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;After 3000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The beacon is left behind by the 13th tribe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [1] points to the two quotes listed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146303</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146303"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T23:11:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your recent change is better but you say &amp;quot;at least 200 years&amp;quot; and this could mean 200 to million years or more which obviously isnt what Cottle says - just change it to &amp;quot;couple hundred&amp;quot; years as Cottle says!! {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Swozie, please calm down. You say you &amp;quot;can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change&amp;quot;, but you&#039;re the one making the fuss here. &amp;quot;A couple of ...&amp;quot; is generally meant as &amp;quot;a few ...&amp;quot;, not exactly 2. Ask anyone, they&#039;ll agree. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It simply does not mean &#039;&#039;exactly&#039;&#039; two years. Yeah, I&#039;m making too much of a fuss about it and it&#039;s annoying me too. Removing it was probably jumping the gun; sorry. I can add a footnote about Cottle&#039;s dialogue, but it&#039;s really pretty clear how he means it. But I could also say that you want your interpretation of facts noted. This cuts both ways. There are an awful lot of theories about things floating around and it&#039;s impossible to give room to everything, so we either eliminate speculation entirely or try to stick to the most sensible interpretations until something is clarified. Again, the best place for this stuff is the Analysis section of the episode pages. They usually have room to write more a bit more about something and are also read by many people. It&#039;s also ideal for challenging &amp;quot;preconceptions&amp;quot; with new ideas as long as they&#039;re not too outlandish (like some of the stuff on the Final Five, Earth, etc. that can be found on forums).&lt;br /&gt;
:Btw, please sign your comments with four tildes: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. There is also a quick link below the edit box for it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:17, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I am calm! I just didn&#039;t think it was in line with the timeline if I had written &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; where all the other items are listed with numbers. So do you suggest I talk about changes before making them in the future?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:38, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don&#039;t think that will be necessary, unless you&#039;re planning to rewrite half an article. If it&#039;s a little thing like this, just make the change, and someone will spot it and undo it if they think it&#039;s wrong. Please don&#039;t be discouraged by the fact that one of your first edits was met by controversy: that&#039;s just bad luck. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:44, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, it was fine. Usually things don&#039;t spiral out of control like this. :s Of course I could have opened a discussion before removing it, but that&#039;s really the same problem. There a few approximate dates on the page with &amp;quot;ca.&amp;quot;, so they don&#039;t all have to be exact. If something isn&#039;t clear, they just have a footnote with the source or reasoning. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:50, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok cool well before I make any more changes I need you to clarify what you interpret as speculation. The cylons not having immunity &amp;quot;implies&amp;quot; that they are based on material that is at least a &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; hundred years old. Simon even says that they are all based on material from the same genetic pool. Now I appreciate this can lead to wild theories but I don&#039;t see it as speculation, its logical deduction, whether you believe it or not is another matter. However the same page talks about &amp;quot;at some unlisted time, travel occured from Earth to Kobol (because of the constellation map)&amp;quot;. This is no different, the evidence implies travel from Earth to Kobol, its never stated as fact its just deduced.--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 17:11, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146293</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146293"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T22:38:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your recent change is better but you say &amp;quot;at least 200 years&amp;quot; and this could mean 200 to million years or more which obviously isnt what Cottle says - just change it to &amp;quot;couple hundred&amp;quot; years as Cottle says!! {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Swozie, please calm down. You say you &amp;quot;can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change&amp;quot;, but you&#039;re the one making the fuss here. &amp;quot;A couple of ...&amp;quot; is generally meant as &amp;quot;a few ...&amp;quot;, not exactly 2. Ask anyone, they&#039;ll agree. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It simply does not mean &#039;&#039;exactly&#039;&#039; two years. Yeah, I&#039;m making too much of a fuss about it and it&#039;s annoying me too. Removing it was probably jumping the gun; sorry. I can add a footnote about Cottle&#039;s dialogue, but it&#039;s really pretty clear how he means it. But I could also say that you want your interpretation of facts noted. This cuts both ways. There are an awful lot of theories about things floating around and it&#039;s impossible to give room to everything, so we either eliminate speculation entirely or try to stick to the most sensible interpretations until something is clarified. Again, the best place for this stuff is the Analysis section of the episode pages. They usually have room to write more a bit more about something and are also read by many people. It&#039;s also ideal for challenging &amp;quot;preconceptions&amp;quot; with new ideas as long as they&#039;re not too outlandish (like some of the stuff on the Final Five, Earth, etc. that can be found on forums).&lt;br /&gt;
:Btw, please sign your comments with four tildes: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. There is also a quick link below the edit box for it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:17, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I am calm! I just didn&#039;t think it was in line with the timeline if I had written &amp;quot;couple&amp;quot; where all the other items are listed with numbers. So do you suggest I talk about changes before making them in the future?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:38, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146289</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146289"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T22:21:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *carbon* dated to 4000 years old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146286</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146286"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T22:01:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your recent change is better but you say &amp;quot;at least 200 years&amp;quot; and this could mean 200 to million years or more which obviously isnt what Cottle says - just change it to &amp;quot;couple hundred&amp;quot; years as Cottle says!!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146285</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146285"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T21:58:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old{{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it. {{unsigned|Swozie}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::The term is used ambigiously when referring to time. It might technically mean two, but when people say &amp;quot;A couple of days&amp;quot; they don&#039;t always mean two, or they might as well say it. The [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/couple Oxford dictionary] says &amp;quot;an indefinite small number&amp;quot; as a possible definition. Anyways, it&#039;s already mentioned on the episode page, and there is a [[Cylon History]] article too. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:47, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t believe there can be so much fuss over such a simple change. Cottle says &amp;quot;a couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple means 2, its speculation that he meant approx 200 years based on your experience of how other people would use the term. I was just posting a hard fact effectively pasted direct from the show and you disagree with it! Do you want facts in this site or just your interpretation of facts? I fully agree that you shouldn&#039;t have speculation posted but I didn&#039;t speculate anything here and besides the site has an awful of preconceptions posted as facts that need to be made clearer, I would like to contribute in this way but it involves this much hassle then its a waste of my time.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146280</id>
		<title>Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_(RDM)/Archive5&amp;diff=146280"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T21:44:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| start = July 28th, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 31st, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer&#039;s conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| start = January 7th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin&#039;s life expectancy after &amp;quot;Epiphanies&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in &amp;quot;Downloaded&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot; Through &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I&amp;quot;|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| start = March 22nd, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating &amp;quot;The Captain&#039;s Hand&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|&amp;quot;Circa:&amp;quot; the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{archive-header&lt;br /&gt;
| archivenumber = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| start = November 19th, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| end = February 27th, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift &amp;quot;Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I &amp;amp; II&amp;quot; over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in &amp;quot;Precipice&amp;quot;}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adama meeting Saul == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn&#039;t it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it&#039;s closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&amp;amp;oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; Timeline Issues, revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
The alterations to the established timeline made in &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]&#039;s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;To review:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
All materials prior to &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot;, as well as [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gaeta: &amp;quot;And may I also take this opportunity to say it&#039;s been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: &amp;quot;Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I&#039;d like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship.&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;Chief Tyrol&#039;s been under my command for over five years&amp;quot; ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. In fact, when listing the ships he&#039;s served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*Tyrol: I&#039;ve served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and enough time that Tyol&#039;s comment about the &amp;quot;many years you&#039;ve served as commanding officer of this ship&amp;quot; makes sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; into account:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adama: &amp;quot;That&#039;s right. He&#039;s one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Novacek: &amp;quot;Well, sir, it&#039;s like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Roslin: &amp;quot;About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thrace: &amp;quot;Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; and transferred with him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol&#039;s statement from the Miniseries about Adama&#039;s lengthy command of &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, and put Bulldog&#039;s aborted mission at -6 BCH - &amp;quot;three years ago&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;about a year prior to the Cylon attack&amp;quot; should be changed to &amp;quot;about six years prior...&amp;quot;. Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol&#039;s backstory with Adama&#039;s, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I couldn&#039;t agree more. &#039;&#039;Finally&#039;&#039; someone points that out. Usually I don&#039;t take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for a few years. Not just Tyrol&#039;s very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (&#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; Gaeta!) followed him from &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; just complicates things unnecessarily. It&#039;s beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It&#039;s clearly a mistake by the writers, but I&#039;m skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just &amp;quot;teach the controversy&amp;quot;, adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama&#039;s Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to &amp;quot;teaching the controversy&amp;quot;, as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can&#039;t ignore by simply &amp;quot;throwing out the dialogue&amp;quot;, which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I&#039;d normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I&#039;m loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol&#039;s backstory and can&#039;t be reconciled with the later version.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As a &amp;quot;one-off&amp;quot; not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; will be referenced again.&lt;br /&gt;
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Farm&amp;quot;) consensus the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; version, and footnoting the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the &amp;quot;Hero version&amp;quot;, footnoting the &amp;quot;official version&amp;quot; and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn&#039;t entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn&#039;t need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It&#039;s infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it&#039;s not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don&#039;t understand this rule that there can&#039;t possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn&#039;t the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it&#039;s taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; page. We can leave the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use &amp;quot;eight years&amp;quot; with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the &#039;hero timeline&#039; as their information is almost entirely derived from &#039;&#039;Hero&#039;&#039;. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred &#039;&#039;&#039;before&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn&#039;t happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: &amp;quot;There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]&amp;quot; or similar notes where relevant &#039;&#039;in the main text&#039;&#039; to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I don&#039;t see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the &amp;quot;three years&amp;quot; in the main text, we&#039;d need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Moreover, moving &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; a few years earlier actually gives Adama&#039;s doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn&#039;t happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW&#039;s idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vote ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; to write, the other is &#039;&#039;how&#039;&#039;. So vote on 1 or 2 &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 1 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option 2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Change the dates (except in the &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/&amp;quot;eight years ago&amp;quot; as per the dossier &#039;&#039;&#039;and&#039;&#039;&#039; earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} As said, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it&#039;s clearly wrong. We don&#039;t just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don&#039;t have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn&#039;t mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don&#039;t think it&#039;s misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;, a set of pages that says &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;, and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;not A&amp;quot;) and then note the particular places that didn&#039;t jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option a ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Option b ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I&#039;m against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; page). I&#039;d create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like &amp;quot;While &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see...&amp;quot; --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn&#039;t as big and doesn&#039;t span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn&#039;t have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; re-re-re-visted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we&#039;re now taking the dossier at face value, I&#039;ve tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama&#039;s reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can&#039;t place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn&#039;t consistent with our other articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what&#039;s the source for placing Tigh&#039;s reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it&#039;s not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn&#039;t make sense that Adama got assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he&#039;s a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We could change it to this:&lt;br /&gt;
*23 BCH: &lt;br /&gt;
**Adama and Tigh meet&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)&lt;br /&gt;
*17 BCH:&lt;br /&gt;
**Adama assigned to &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039; makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major&lt;br /&gt;
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The only point I&#039;m unsure is the time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says &amp;quot;Major: Battlestar Atlantia&amp;quot;. Maybe that means he was a major on &#039;&#039;Atlantia&#039;&#039;, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama&#039;s accomplishments in the fleet.  It would seem to me, although I&#039;m not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions.  In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there&#039;s not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That&#039;s said explicitly in a deleted scene from &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;. The dossier doesn&#039;t really contradict on screen information as such, as &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; is pretty vague about dating. We have the &amp;quot;20 years&amp;quot; from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as &amp;quot;valid until contradicted&amp;quot;. So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I&#039;m favoring that).&lt;br /&gt;
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per &amp;quot;Torn&amp;quot;, in which Adama calls Tigh &amp;quot;The man that I&#039;ve known for the past thirty years&amp;quot;). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per &amp;quot;Act of Contrition&amp;quot;) must take place shortly afterwards.&lt;br /&gt;
:::We can date Adama&#039;s marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama&#039;s [[: Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh&#039;s first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh&#039;s reinstatement). Adama&#039;s comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore&#039;s comment that the &amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn&#039;t necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two comments though: First, Adama&#039;s rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn&#039;t quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states &amp;quot;the new wife pulled through&amp;quot;. And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot; as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter&#039;s reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they&#039;ve known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn&#039;t such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039; mission.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also regarding Tyrol&#039;s &amp;quot;ten years&amp;quot; comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as &amp;quot;circa&amp;quot;. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ancient History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *carbon* dated to 4000 years old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the &amp;quot;undated&amp;quot; fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146279</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146279"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T21:29:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a couple&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;a few&amp;quot;. That can be anything from 2 to maybe 4 or 5. In any case, it&#039;s not an accurate date. If you had written something like &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;over&#039;&#039;&#039; 200 years BCH&amp;quot;, then &#039;&#039;maybe&#039;&#039;. I still question its relevance. It&#039;s another speculative topic, especially with the shaky science of the episode. As it&#039;s written now, it&#039;s stands there without any point. One could add that piece of speculation/analysis, but that&#039;s not really fitting for a timeline. It could be added as analysis, or better question to the episode article though. Actually, it&#039;s already touched on about [[A Measure of Salvation#Analysis|3/4th of the way down]]. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 4 January 2008 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A couple does not mean a few! A few means 3,4,5 or whatever, a couple means 2 thats all there is to it (as Cottle would say). It borders speculation that it is relevant to cylon history which is why I didn&#039;t say that - thats left up to the reader to interpret but since its a valid piece of information on Coloniel History then this is the most relevant place for it.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146274</id>
		<title>User talk:Serenity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serenity&amp;diff=146274"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T21:03:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:Archive-bot&lt;br /&gt;
|maxarchivesize = 32K&lt;br /&gt;
|counter = 2&lt;br /&gt;
|algo = old(30d)&lt;br /&gt;
|archive = User talk:Serenity/Archive%(counter)d&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ArchiveTOC}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Link title&amp;quot; stuff has to do with the editing bar. I believe the user might have hit that accidentally when beginning to edit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &amp;amp;mdash; &#039;&#039;New&#039;&#039;]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:43, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, probably. Though I can only see [] and [[]] there. But never mind. No big deal. :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:48, 19 November 2007 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immunity to virus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for posting it again, thought the change failed to save since you removed it so fast. Anyway I have to disagree with your reasons - Cottle says &amp;quot;couple hundred years ago&amp;quot;, a couple is 2 so its 200 years ago and it is very relevent since its a major clue as the history of the cylons. Since they didn&#039;t have an immunity to the virus then it implies they are based on material that is at least 200 years old&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146272</id>
		<title>Timeline (RDM)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146272"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T20:55:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{timeline series}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article attempts to plot the events illustrated or mentioned in the history and prehistory of [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)|the Twelve Colonies]] in the [[Re-imagined Series]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All dates use the day of the [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] as the central time marker for all events in the series. Items that occur before the Fall are marked as &amp;quot;BCH&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;Before Cylon holocaust&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ancient History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Over 17,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; A supernova creates the [[Ionian nebula]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The [[Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)|Thirteenth Tribe]] reportedly leaves the planet [[Kobol (RDM)|Kobol]], later leaving a [[Lion&#039;s Head beacon|beacon]] in space and building the [[Temple of Five]] ([[The Eye of Jupiter]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Galen Tyrol]] cites 4,000 years as the approximate age of the temple. This is the oldest date noted in the Re-imagined Series timeline, but also conflicts with the prior date of Pythia and her works as described by [[Elosha]] in the season 1 episode &amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]],&amp;quot; where she notes that the exodus of &#039;&#039;&#039;all 13 tribes&#039;&#039;&#039; occurred 2,000 years prior.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  At some undated point, something travels from [[Earth (RDM)|Earth]] to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3,600 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Pythia]] records her prophecies&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The remaining Twelve Tribes leave Kobol &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years to 52 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;  The Twelve Colonies grow and prosper. Each colony acts as a sovereign nation, complete with inter-colonial wars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent Colonial History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;200 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: humans develop immunity to the virus on the [[Lion&#039;s Head beacon|beacon]] &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;69 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Saul Tigh]] born (defined by deleted scene in &amp;quot;[[Valley of Darkness]]&amp;quot; concerning the &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039;) (He has [[Crossroads, Part II|recently]] been revealed as a [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]], presumably making his birth questionable.)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;64 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[William Adama]] born in Qualai, [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]] ([[Hero]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;55 - 52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Somewhere during this time, the [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]] are built to aid in hard labor and warfare ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Cylon revolt starts the first [[Cylon War]] ([[Colonial Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Articles of Colonization]] signed ([[Colonial Day]], [http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/archives/2005/04/index.html#a000025 RDM, April 11, 2005])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;51 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039; Colonial ship &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039; is lost after a boarding action by [[Cylon Centurion Model 0005|Cylon Centurions]] ([[Valley of Darkness]], deleted scene)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 50 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]&#039;&#039; enters service&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;42 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama begins his service in the Colonial Fleet as a Viper pilot, near the end of the Cylon War (&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, [[Razor Flashbacks]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;40 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Operation Raptor Talon]] conducted by the Colonial Fleet. Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; destroyed (Razor Flashbacks)&lt;br /&gt;
**Armistice ends the [[Cylon War]]. Cylons exile themselves from the Twelve Colonies (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**William Adama mustered out of the Colonial Fleet (&amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot;, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;37 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama enlists as merchant marine and serves aboard inter-colony freighters (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 28 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galen Tyrol]] born &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;At the time of the Cylon attack, Tyrol has &amp;quot;ten years experience&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]]), and has &amp;quot;served on battlestars since I was 18&amp;quot; ([[Resistance (episode)|Resistance]]). This puts his birth in approximately 28 BCH, allowing for a few years leeway with the first comment.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  (His revelation as a Cylon calls this date into question.)&lt;br /&gt;
** First meeting between William Adama and Saul Tigh (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The podcast for &amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot; places their meeting &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot;. In &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;, Adama states that he has known Tigh for 30 years. Furthermore, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]] places his reinstatement into the Colonial Fleet at 23 BCH. &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; choses to use the more consistent dates.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 27 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William and [[Carolanne Adama]] meet and marry &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;&amp;gt;This date is assumed as follows: Zak died 2 BCH. Since he graduated from some kind of military academy, he would at least 22 years old, following real world models. On a [[:Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photograph]] of William Adama with his sons, Lee seems to be about two years older than Zak. Adama and his wife probably met not long before Lee&#039;s birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 26 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Lee Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 24 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Zak Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;23 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; deleted scene, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;21 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul Tigh reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain by now-Major Adama (Scattered) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement is not specified on screen. The February/March issue of &#039;&#039;Battlestar Galactica: The Official Magazine&#039;&#039; gives it as two years: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Adama reenlisted with the service and Tigh spent two years drinking before Adama pulled strings to get him back into service.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;20 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Last significant [[FTL]] jump recorded in &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; logs (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Zarek]] imprisoned for blowing up a government building on [[Sagittaron]] ([[Bastille Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;17 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned to the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;, where he makes his 1000th Viper landing (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;[[Act of Contrition]]&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;13 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned as executive officer to the new battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;11 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Laura Roslin]] begins her career in politics ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 10 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Galen Tyrol enlists in the Colonial Fleet as a non-commissioned officer (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;9 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama promoted to commander and assigned as commander of the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Valkyrie]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;7 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul and [[Ellen Tigh]] marry (&amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]]&amp;quot;, [[List of Deleted Scenes (RDM)#Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I|deleted scene]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;6 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama leads an aborted covert intelligence mission aboard &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;. [[Daniel Novacek]] is shot down and captured by the Cylons. Adama and Tigh are subsequently assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;&amp;gt;While dialogue from &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; places these events at 1 BCH, this contradicts previously established dates about the time Adama and others served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. See [[Hero#Analysis]] for a detailed explanation why &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; chooses to treat this as a continuity error and change the date.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;5 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Laura Roslin]]&#039;s last breast exam prior to her cancer diagnosis ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Galen Tyrol assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Litmus]]) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Since Adama states that Tyrol has been under his commander for &amp;quot;over five years&amp;quot;, this might also be one year earlier.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kara Thrace]] graduates from the Colonial Fleet Academy ([[Maelstrom]])&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Socrata Thrace]] dies of stomach cancer (Maelstrom)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Felix Gaeta]] assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Caprica Six]] begins residence on Caprica ([[Downloaded]]), first encounters Dr. [[Gaius Baltar]] (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sharon Valerii]] begins service aboard &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[The Farm]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Zak Adama dies in a flight school accident (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Lt. [[Kara Thrace]] is re-assigned from flight school to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;1 Year BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**Last time William and Carolanne Adama speak (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Carolanne Adama gets engaged (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Anastasia Dualla]] last visits her home ([[Final Cut]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Events of the [[Miniseries]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Zero Hour:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Armistice Station]] is destroyed by [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]] forces&lt;br /&gt;
**Laura Roslin is diagnosed with inoperable breast cancer&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; is decommissioned&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Twelve Colonies (RDM)|Twelve Colonies]] are heavily bombarded by nuclear bombs&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Picon (RDM)|Picon]] [[Fleet Headquarters]] is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; last [[Viper Mark VII]] squadron is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**A battle near [[Virgon (RDM)|Virgon]] ends with the total loss of the remaining Colonial Fleet including the flagship &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Mercury class battlestar|battlestar]] &#039;&#039;[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]&#039;&#039; luckily escapes the destruction of the [[Scorpion Fleet Shipyards]] ([[Pegasus (episode)|Pegasus]])&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; engages [[Cylon Raider (RDM)|Cylon Raider]]s and survives with moderate damage and 85 dead&lt;br /&gt;
**Last transmission from the Colonies received by Laura Roslin aboard &#039;&#039;[[Colonial Heavy 798]]&#039;&#039; from a [[Jack|fellow secretary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Case Orange]] contingency mechanism assigns Roslin the office of the President of the Twelve Colonies&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin gathers stranded civilian and military ships in the vicinity of [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Commander [[William Adama|Adama]] assumes overall Fleet command and orders regroup at [[Ragnar Anchorage]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin&#039;s fleet survives two Cylon attacks and meets at Ragnar&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; changes from battle stance to civilian protection, and escorts the civilian fleet from Ragnar towards the [[Prolmar Sector]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 1 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 2 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 3 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 4 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:85%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:A to Z]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Behind the Scenes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RDM]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Zeitlinie]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146269</id>
		<title>Timeline (RDM)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146269"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T20:32:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{timeline series}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article attempts to plot the events illustrated or mentioned in the history and prehistory of [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)|the Twelve Colonies]] in the [[Re-imagined Series]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All dates use the day of the [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] as the central time marker for all events in the series. Items that occur before the Fall are marked as &amp;quot;BCH&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;Before Cylon holocaust&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ancient History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Over 17,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; A supernova creates the [[Ionian nebula]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The [[Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)|Thirteenth Tribe]] reportedly leaves the planet [[Kobol (RDM)|Kobol]], later leaving a [[Lion&#039;s Head beacon|beacon]] in space and building the [[Temple of Five]] ([[The Eye of Jupiter]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Galen Tyrol]] cites 4,000 years as the approximate age of the temple. This is the oldest date noted in the Re-imagined Series timeline, but also conflicts with the prior date of Pythia and her works as described by [[Elosha]] in the season 1 episode &amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]],&amp;quot; where she notes that the exodus of &#039;&#039;&#039;all 13 tribes&#039;&#039;&#039; occurred 2,000 years prior.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  At some undated point, something travels from [[Earth (RDM)|Earth]] to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3,600 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Pythia]] records her prophecies&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The remaining Twelve Tribes leave Kobol &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years to 52 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;  The Twelve Colonies grow and prosper. Each colony acts as a sovereign nation, complete with inter-colonial wars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent Colonial History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;200 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: humans develop immunity to the virus found on the [[Lion&#039;s Head beacon|beacon]] &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;69 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Saul Tigh]] born (defined by deleted scene in &amp;quot;[[Valley of Darkness]]&amp;quot; concerning the &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039;) (He has [[Crossroads, Part II|recently]] been revealed as a [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]], presumably making his birth questionable.)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;64 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[William Adama]] born in Qualai, [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]] ([[Hero]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;55 - 52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Somewhere during this time, the [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]] are built to aid in hard labor and warfare ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Cylon revolt starts the first [[Cylon War]] ([[Colonial Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Articles of Colonization]] signed ([[Colonial Day]], [http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/archives/2005/04/index.html#a000025 RDM, April 11, 2005])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;51 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039; Colonial ship &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039; is lost after a boarding action by [[Cylon Centurion Model 0005|Cylon Centurions]] ([[Valley of Darkness]], deleted scene)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 50 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]&#039;&#039; enters service&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;42 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama begins his service in the Colonial Fleet as a Viper pilot, near the end of the Cylon War (&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, [[Razor Flashbacks]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;40 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Operation Raptor Talon]] conducted by the Colonial Fleet. Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; destroyed (Razor Flashbacks)&lt;br /&gt;
**Armistice ends the [[Cylon War]]. Cylons exile themselves from the Twelve Colonies (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**William Adama mustered out of the Colonial Fleet (&amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot;, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;37 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama enlists as merchant marine and served aboard inter-colony freighters (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 28 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galen Tyrol]] born &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;At the time of the Cylon Attack, Tyrol has &amp;quot;ten years experience&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]]), and has &amp;quot;served on battlestars since I was 18&amp;quot; ([[Resistance (episode)|Resistance]]). This puts his birth in approximately 28 BCH, allowing for a few years leeway with the first comment.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  (His revelation as a Cylon calls this date into question.)&lt;br /&gt;
** First meeting between William Adama and Saul Tigh (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The podcast for &amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot; places their meeting &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot;. In &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;, Adama states that he has known Tigh for 30 years. Furthermore, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]] places his reinstatement into the Colonial Fleet at 23 BCH. &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; choses to use the more consistent dates.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 27 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William and [[Carolanne Adama]] meet and marry &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;&amp;gt;This date is assumed as follows: Zak died 2 BCH. Since he graduated from some kind of military academy, he would at least 22 years old, following real world models. On a [[:Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photograph]] of William Adama with his sons, Lee seems to be about two years older than Zak. Adama and his wife probably met not long before Lee&#039;s birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 26 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Lee Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 24 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Zak Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;23 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; deleted scene, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;21 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul Tigh reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain by now-Major Adama (Scattered) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement is not specified on screen. The February/March issue of &#039;&#039;Battlestar Galactica: The Official Magazine&#039;&#039; gives it as two years: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Adama reenlisted with the service and Tigh spent two years drinking before Adama pulled strings to get him back into service.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;20 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Last significant [[FTL]] jump recorded in &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; logs (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Zarek]] imprisoned for blowing up a government building on [[Sagittaron]] ([[Bastille Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;17 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned to the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;, where he makes his 1000th Viper landing (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;[[Act of Contrition]]&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;13 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned as executive officer to the new battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;11 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Laura Roslin]] begins her career in politics ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 10 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Galen Tyrol enlists in the Colonial Fleet as a non-commissioned officer (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;9 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama promoted to commander and assigned as commander of the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Valkyrie]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;7 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul and [[Ellen Tigh]] marry (&amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]]&amp;quot;, [[List of Deleted Scenes (RDM)#Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I|deleted scene]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;6 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama leads an aborted covert intelligence mission aboard &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;. [[Daniel Novacek]] is shot down and captured by the Cylons. Adama and Tigh are subsequently assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;&amp;gt;While dialogue from &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; places these events at 1 BCH, this contradicts previously established dates about the time Adama and others served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. See [[Hero#Analysis]] for a detailed explanation why &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; chooses to treat this as a continuity error and change the date.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;5 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Laura Roslin]]&#039;s last breast exam prior to her cancer diagnosis ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Galen Tyrol assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Litmus]]) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Since Adama states that Tyrol has been under his commander for &amp;quot;over five years&amp;quot;, this might also be one year earlier.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kara Thrace]] graduates from the Colonial Fleet Academy ([[Maelstrom]])&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Socrata Thrace]] dies of stomach cancer (Maelstrom)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Felix Gaeta]] assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Caprica Six]] begins residence on Caprica ([[Downloaded]]), first encounters Dr. [[Gaius Baltar]] (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sharon Valerii]] begins service aboard &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[The Farm]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Zak Adama dies in a flight school accident (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Lt. [[Kara Thrace]] is re-assigned from flight school to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;1 Year BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**Last time William and Carolanne Adama speak (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Carolanne Adama gets engaged (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Anastasia Dualla]] last visits her home ([[Final Cut]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Events of the [[Miniseries]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Zero Hour:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Armistice Station]] is destroyed by [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]] forces&lt;br /&gt;
**Laura Roslin is diagnosed with inoperable breast cancer&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; is decommissioned&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Twelve Colonies (RDM)|Twelve Colonies]] are heavily bombarded by nuclear bombs&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Picon (RDM)|Picon]] [[Fleet Headquarters]] is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; last [[Viper Mark VII]] squadron is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**A battle near [[Virgon (RDM)|Virgon]] ends with the total loss of the remaining Colonial Fleet including the flagship &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Mercury class battlestar|battlestar]] &#039;&#039;[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]&#039;&#039; luckily escapes the destruction of the [[Scorpion Fleet Shipyards]] ([[Pegasus (episode)|Pegasus]])&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; engages [[Cylon Raider (RDM)|Cylon Raider]]s and survives with moderate damage and 85 dead&lt;br /&gt;
**Last transmission from the Colonies received by Laura Roslin aboard &#039;&#039;[[Colonial Heavy 798]]&#039;&#039; from a [[Jack|fellow secretary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Case Orange]] contingency mechanism assigns Roslin the office of the President of the Twelve Colonies&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin gathers stranded civilian and military ships in the vicinity of [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Commander [[William Adama|Adama]] assumes overall Fleet command and orders regroup at [[Ragnar Anchorage]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin&#039;s fleet survives two Cylon attacks and meets at Ragnar&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; changes from battle stance to civilian protection, and escorts the civilian fleet from Ragnar towards the [[Prolmar Sector]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 1 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 2 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 3 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 4 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:85%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:A to Z]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Behind the Scenes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RDM]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Zeitlinie]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146268</id>
		<title>Timeline (RDM)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_(RDM)&amp;diff=146268"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T20:31:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{timeline series}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article attempts to plot the events illustrated or mentioned in the history and prehistory of [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)|the Twelve Colonies]] in the [[Re-imagined Series]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All dates use the day of the [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] as the central time marker for all events in the series. Items that occur before the Fall are marked as &amp;quot;BCH&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;Before Cylon holocaust&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ancient History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Over 17,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; A supernova creates the [[Ionian nebula]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The [[Thirteenth Tribe (RDM)|Thirteenth Tribe]] reportedly leaves the planet [[Kobol (RDM)|Kobol]], later leaving a [[Lion&#039;s Head beacon|beacon]] in space and building the [[Temple of Five]] ([[The Eye of Jupiter]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Galen Tyrol]] cites 4,000 years as the approximate age of the temple. This is the oldest date noted in the Re-imagined Series timeline, but also conflicts with the prior date of Pythia and her works as described by [[Elosha]] in the season 1 episode &amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]],&amp;quot; where she notes that the exodus of &#039;&#039;&#039;all 13 tribes&#039;&#039;&#039; occurred 2,000 years prior.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  At some undated point, something travels from [[Earth (RDM)|Earth]] to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3,600 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Pythia]] records her prophecies&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; The remaining Twelve Tribes leave Kobol &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2,000 years to 52 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;  The Twelve Colonies grow and prosper. Each colony acts as a sovereign nation, complete with inter-colonial wars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent Colonial History==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;200 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: humans develop immunity to the virus found on the beacon&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;69 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Saul Tigh]] born (defined by deleted scene in &amp;quot;[[Valley of Darkness]]&amp;quot; concerning the &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039;) (He has [[Crossroads, Part II|recently]] been revealed as a [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]], presumably making his birth questionable.)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;64 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[William Adama]] born in Qualai, [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]] ([[Hero]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;55 - 52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Somewhere during this time, the [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]] are built to aid in hard labor and warfare ([[Miniseries]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Cylon revolt starts the first [[Cylon War]] ([[Colonial Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;52 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Articles of Colonization]] signed ([[Colonial Day]], [http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/archives/2005/04/index.html#a000025 RDM, April 11, 2005])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;51 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039; Colonial ship &#039;&#039;[[Brenik]]&#039;&#039; is lost after a boarding action by [[Cylon Centurion Model 0005|Cylon Centurions]] ([[Valley of Darkness]], deleted scene)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 50 years BCH&#039;&#039;&#039;: Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Galactica (RDM)|Galactica]]&#039;&#039; enters service&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;42 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama begins his service in the Colonial Fleet as a Viper pilot, near the end of the Cylon War (&amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;, [[Razor Flashbacks]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;40 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Operation Raptor Talon]] conducted by the Colonial Fleet. Battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; destroyed (Razor Flashbacks)&lt;br /&gt;
**Armistice ends the [[Cylon War]]. Cylons exile themselves from the Twelve Colonies (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**William Adama mustered out of the Colonial Fleet (&amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot;, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;37 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama enlists as merchant marine and served aboard inter-colony freighters (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 28 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galen Tyrol]] born &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;At the time of the Cylon Attack, Tyrol has &amp;quot;ten years experience&amp;quot; ([[Miniseries]]), and has &amp;quot;served on battlestars since I was 18&amp;quot; ([[Resistance (episode)|Resistance]]). This puts his birth in approximately 28 BCH, allowing for a few years leeway with the first comment.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  (His revelation as a Cylon calls this date into question.)&lt;br /&gt;
** First meeting between William Adama and Saul Tigh (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The podcast for &amp;quot;[[Scattered]]&amp;quot; places their meeting &amp;quot;twenty years ago&amp;quot;. In &amp;quot;[[Torn]]&amp;quot;, Adama states that he has known Tigh for 30 years. Furthermore, [[Sources:Adama&#039;s Dossier|Adama&#039;s dossier]] places his reinstatement into the Colonial Fleet at 23 BCH. &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; choses to use the more consistent dates.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 27 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William and [[Carolanne Adama]] meet and marry &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;&amp;gt;This date is assumed as follows: Zak died 2 BCH. Since he graduated from some kind of military academy, he would at least 22 years old, following real world models. On a [[:Image:Primusphoto.jpg|photograph]] of William Adama with his sons, Lee seems to be about two years older than Zak. Adama and his wife probably met not long before Lee&#039;s birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 26 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Lee Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 24 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Zak Adama]] born &amp;lt;ref name = &amp;quot;leezak&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;23 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain (&amp;quot;Scattered&amp;quot; deleted scene, Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;21 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul Tigh reinstated in the Colonial Fleet at the rank of captain by now-Major Adama (Scattered) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The time between Adama&#039;s and Tigh&#039;s reinstatement is not specified on screen. The February/March issue of &#039;&#039;Battlestar Galactica: The Official Magazine&#039;&#039; gives it as two years: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Adama reenlisted with the service and Tigh spent two years drinking before Adama pulled strings to get him back into service.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;20 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Last significant [[FTL]] jump recorded in &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; logs (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Zarek]] imprisoned for blowing up a government building on [[Sagittaron]] ([[Bastille Day]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;17 BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned to the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;, where he makes his 1000th Viper landing (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;[[Act of Contrition]]&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;13 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama assigned as executive officer to the new battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Columbia (RDM)|Columbia]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;11 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Laura Roslin]] begins her career in politics ([[Litmus]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;ca. 10 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Galen Tyrol enlists in the Colonial Fleet as a non-commissioned officer (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;9 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama promoted to commander and assigned as commander of the battlestar &#039;&#039;[[Valkyrie]]&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;7 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; Saul and [[Ellen Tigh]] marry (&amp;quot;[[Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I]]&amp;quot;, [[List of Deleted Scenes (RDM)#Kobol&#039;s Last Gleaming, Part I|deleted scene]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;6 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; William Adama leads an aborted covert intelligence mission aboard &#039;&#039;Valkyrie&#039;&#039;. [[Daniel Novacek]] is shot down and captured by the Cylons. Adama and Tigh are subsequently assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Adama&#039;s dossier, &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot;) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;&amp;gt;While dialogue from &amp;quot;[[Hero]]&amp;quot; places these events at 1 BCH, this contradicts previously established dates about the time Adama and others served on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039;. See [[Hero#Analysis]] for a detailed explanation why &#039;&#039;Battlestar Wiki&#039;&#039; chooses to treat this as a continuity error and change the date.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;5 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Laura Roslin]]&#039;s last breast exam prior to her cancer diagnosis ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Galen Tyrol assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Litmus]]) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Since Adama states that Tyrol has been under his commander for &amp;quot;over five years&amp;quot;, this might also be one year earlier.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;4 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kara Thrace]] graduates from the Colonial Fleet Academy ([[Maelstrom]])&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Socrata Thrace]] dies of stomach cancer (Maelstrom)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;3 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Felix Gaeta]] assigned to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;2 years BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Caprica Six]] begins residence on Caprica ([[Downloaded]]), first encounters Dr. [[Gaius Baltar]] (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sharon Valerii]] begins service aboard &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[The Farm]])&lt;br /&gt;
**Zak Adama dies in a flight school accident (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Lt. [[Kara Thrace]] is re-assigned from flight school to &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; ([[Act of Contrition]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;1 Year BCH:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**Last time William and Carolanne Adama speak (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**Carolanne Adama gets engaged (Miniseries)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Anastasia Dualla]] last visits her home ([[Final Cut]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Events of the [[Miniseries]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Zero Hour:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Armistice Station]] is destroyed by [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylon]] forces&lt;br /&gt;
**Laura Roslin is diagnosed with inoperable breast cancer&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; is decommissioned&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Twelve Colonies (RDM)|Twelve Colonies]] are heavily bombarded by nuclear bombs&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Picon (RDM)|Picon]] [[Fleet Headquarters]] is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;s&#039;&#039; last [[Viper Mark VII]] squadron is destroyed&lt;br /&gt;
**A battle near [[Virgon (RDM)|Virgon]] ends with the total loss of the remaining Colonial Fleet including the flagship &#039;&#039;[[Atlantia (RDM)|Atlantia]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**The [[Mercury class battlestar|battlestar]] &#039;&#039;[[Pegasus (RDM)|Pegasus]]&#039;&#039; luckily escapes the destruction of the [[Scorpion Fleet Shipyards]] ([[Pegasus (episode)|Pegasus]])&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; engages [[Cylon Raider (RDM)|Cylon Raider]]s and survives with moderate damage and 85 dead&lt;br /&gt;
**Last transmission from the Colonies received by Laura Roslin aboard &#039;&#039;[[Colonial Heavy 798]]&#039;&#039; from a [[Jack|fellow secretary]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Case Orange]] contingency mechanism assigns Roslin the office of the President of the Twelve Colonies&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin gathers stranded civilian and military ships in the vicinity of [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Commander [[William Adama|Adama]] assumes overall Fleet command and orders regroup at [[Ragnar Anchorage]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Roslin&#039;s fleet survives two Cylon attacks and meets at Ragnar&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; changes from battle stance to civilian protection, and escorts the civilian fleet from Ragnar towards the [[Prolmar Sector]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 1 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 2 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 3 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Season 4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;See [[Timeline - Season 4 (RDM)]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:85%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:A to Z]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Behind the Scenes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colonial History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RDM]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Zeitlinie]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&amp;diff=144694</id>
		<title>Humanoid Cylon speculation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&amp;diff=144694"/>
		<updated>2007-12-26T14:10:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Swozie: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{plausible speculation}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons&#039;]] transformation into twelve distinct [[Humanoid Cylon|humanoid forms]] introduces serious problems for the remnant of humanity known as the [[The Fleet (RDM)|Fleet]] to identify Cylon operative from human. At the beginning of their journey it seemed that anyone could be a humanoid Cylon, causing doubt and suspicion within the human populace (as evidenced in &amp;quot;[[Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down]]&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the real world speculation about who could be a Cylon infiltrator in the Fleet has also been rife among fans of the show. Over the course of the miniseries and the first two seasons viewers were introduced to the &amp;quot;[[Significant Seven]]&amp;quot;, however the natures of each of these characters were all revealed shortly after the characters&#039; introductions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In season three the nature of speculation for both the characters and the fans turned to the [[Final Five]], enigmatic, almost-mystical figures who seemed to have a [[The Temple of Five|link]] to ancient colonial history. The nature of the five, according to [[Ron D. Moore|Moore]], is &amp;quot;fundamentally different&amp;quot; from the other seven models&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite_rdm_podcast|episode=Frak Party Q and A|act=|id=ffdifferent|timestamp=19:05|totalrunning=78:27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the conclusion of &amp;quot;[[Crossroads, Part II]]&amp;quot; four recurring characters are revealed to be Cylons. The revelation that long standing characters such as Colonel [[Saul Tigh|Tigh]] and Chief [[Galen Tyrol|Tyrol]] were Cylons blew the field wide open, if they could be &amp;quot;[[toaster]]s,&amp;quot; then &#039;&#039;anyone&#039;&#039; could be the last Cylon. In particular, Tigh has a long and well-documented character history dating back to the first [[Cylon War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article details [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad#Derived content|plausible speculation]] on which of the central and supporting characters in &#039;&#039;[[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)|Battlestar Galactica]]&#039;&#039; could be the final one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Clues from Official Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
During a Q&amp;amp;A session on the official Sci Fi channel Battlestar Galactica forum Ronald D. Moore notes that he already knows who the last Cylon is, and that he&#039;s already left clues as to who it is&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://forums.scifi.com/index.php?showtopic=2270103&amp;amp;st=0&amp;amp;p=3041263&amp;amp;#entry3041263 20 Answers - SCI FI FORUMS] Retrieved 03-27-2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bradley Thompson]] was asked when the writers knew the identity of the final five:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Four of the five were recent. If memory serves, the fifth (which may change) we&#039;ve been kicking around since about the end of Season One.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[BW:OC#Identity of the Final Five]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General factors for consideration==&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of narrative, to prevent an anti-climax it seems likely that the final Cylon would probably need to be a more prominent character than those of the Four. This centers the spotlight in the central &amp;quot;human&amp;quot; characters ([[Roslin]], [[William Adama|William]] and [[Lee Adama]], [[Gaius Baltar|Baltar]] and [[Kara Thrace|Starbuck]]). However, there is still an entire season for characters to develop and gain significance with viewers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the Final Five being &amp;quot;fundamentally different&amp;quot; from the Seven, extrapolating any characteristics we learned of Cylons from the Seven (including physiology, loyalty or self-awareness) is of questionable validity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Colonel Tigh has a well documented history stretching back at least to the first Cylon War. Also considering the [[Temple of Five]], Final Five Cylons, somehow, significantly pre-date the Seven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been seen that Cylons can start families, however it is unclear how the Five came to exist. Having known natural parents would &#039;&#039;seem&#039;&#039; to preclude one being any more than half-Cylon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the 11 so far there have been only four female models (and [[Number Three|one]] has been [[boxed]]). The final Cylon being female would serve to equalize this gender bias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[first Hybrid]] gives a monologue about his knowledge of the Final Five in the extended version of &amp;quot;[[Razor]]&amp;quot;. It states that &amp;quot;...the fifth is still is in shadow, drawn toward the light, hungering for redemption, that will only come in the howl of terrible suffering.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Characters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of [[Karl Agathon]] and [[Cally Tyrol]], who are confirmed to have half-Cylon, half-human children&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite_rdm_podcast|episode=Frak Party Q and A|act=|id=hybridnick|timestamp=22:41|totalrunning=78:27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, any &amp;quot;human&amp;quot; character could be a Cylon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Laura Roslin]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laura_Roslin_promo.jpg|right|90px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The colonies&#039; president has been unquestionably a boon to humanity&#039;s search for earth, indeed the two times she has been removed from office have been the two greatest setbacks in the journey. Though her loyalty is unquestionable, her past is more difficult to ascertain. Roslin has never discussed her family in any way.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Roslin has also experienced prophetic dreams and visions (those induced by [[chamalla]], and a dream she shared with the Cylons [[Caprica Six]] and [[Sharon Agathon]]). She fits very well the profile of the [[Sacred Scrolls|scroll&#039;s]] dying leader, the scrolls also having links to other more mystical elements of the series, including the [[Temple of Five]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However her dying nature, from an aggressive form of breast cancer is also the biggest cause to doubt Roslin being a Cylon. It is unknown whether the Final Five can succumb to cancer, but Cylons seem to be generally tougher than humans. Baltar&#039;s cure in &amp;quot;[[Epiphanies]]&amp;quot; was probably designed based on the assumption that Roslin&#039;s physiology is human.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[William Adama]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:William_Adama_promo.jpg|right|90px]]&lt;br /&gt;
If William Adama were revealed to be a Cylon, it would be one of the biggest shocks the series could produce. Overall Adama appears to epitomize a very human set of strengths and weaknesses. Nevertheless, he does experience hallucinations in the fifth [[Razor Flashback]], although he sees and hears people in his environment instead of seeing himself in a different one. The experience could also be explained by stress or other factors, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Adama family is well documented. His father, [[Joseph Adama]], was known to [[Romo Lampkin]]. The proposed spin-off &#039;&#039;[[Caprica (series)|Caprica]]&#039;&#039;, would have featured the history of the Adama family. This may have been difficult to square with any revelation about William Adama being a Cylon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Adama experiences guilt for actions he believe may have triggered the war ([[Hero]]). This could be the &amp;quot;hungering for redemption&amp;quot; that the [[First Hybrid]] talks about (see above).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Lee Adama]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lee_Adama_promo.jpg|right|90px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Could Lee&#039;s chronic angst be partly due to guilt at his Cylon nature? Was the [[Leoben]] who said &amp;quot;Adama&#039;s a Cylon&amp;quot; ([[Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down]]) referring to Lee? (note: the writers hadn&#039;t decided on the identity of the final Cylon at that point). He might project in &amp;quot;[[Resurrection Ship, Part II]]&amp;quot;, although this is more likely an oxygen deprivation induced hallucination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his defense, Lee is also a member of the well-documented Adama family. A &amp;quot;switched at birth&amp;quot; scenario could explain this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee is characterised by near chronic angst for various reasons. Could he be the one &amp;quot;hungering for redemption&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Gaius Baltar]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gaius_Baltar_promo.jpg|right|90px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{mainarticle|Baltar as Cylon speculation}}&lt;br /&gt;
Baltar&#039;s vast intelligence, weak character and lack of loyalty to anyone but himself have made him ultimately humanity&#039;s (unwitting) betrayer. Baltar himself longs to be a Cylon as this would absolve himself, however comes to the conclusion that he is human after all. Baltar certainly has a lot to be guilty about, but whether he has enough of a conscience to be truly &amp;quot;hungering for redemption&amp;quot; is questionable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are good reasons to suspect Baltar. He exhibits vast intelligence that may be superhuman in nature. His [[Virtual Six]], her precognitive abilities, and the apparently projected environments they often co-experience are suspicious, as well as the fact that both Virtual Six and later the [[Hybrid]] tell him that he is &amp;quot;chosen&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Caprica Six]]&#039;s final vision in &amp;quot;[[Crossroads, Part II]]&amp;quot; she sees the hooded figures of the final five staring at her from the upper level. Baltar is standing next to her in the vision as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Kara Thrace]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kara_Thrace.jpg|right|90px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{seealso|The Destiny}}&lt;br /&gt;
Kara Thrace&#039;s path towards her destiny has involved many strange, perhaps supernatural events. Whether this destiny involves her being a Cylon is a matter of speculation (indeed members of the [[Significant Seven]], who do not know who the final five are, tell Starbuck she has this destiny), but it is certain Thrace is &#039;&#039;something&#039;&#039; special. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certainly Thrace exhibits phenomenal natural skill as a pilot, and manages to learn to fly a [[Cylon Raider (RDM)|Raider]] exceptionally quickly ([[You Can&#039;t Go Home Again]]). From childhood, Thrace has been drawing the mandala from the [[Temple of Five]]. However she was also physically abused as a child and still carries the scars; Cylons seem to be more robust than humans and possibly may not carry such long-term injuries. The same may be said of the knee injury which put a stop to Thrace&#039;s [[Pyramid (RDM)|Pyramid]] playing ambitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most strikingly, the ace pilot apparently dies in &amp;quot;[[Maelstrom]]&amp;quot; but returns ([[Resurrection (RDM)|resurrected]]?) in &amp;quot;[[Crossroads, Part II]]&amp;quot;. Furthermore, not being on &#039;&#039;Galactica&#039;&#039; at the time, Thrace is the only major &amp;quot;human&amp;quot; character who has a reason for not reacting to the [[The Music|music]] which, to the &amp;quot;four&amp;quot;, reverberates around the ship. However the final Cylon may, for some reason, not have heard it, or may have ignored it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Katee Sackhoff]] was apparently told she is not a Cylon&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/8547/redeye3copyci7.jpg See this magazine cutting.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{spoilli|According to [http://roadrunnerdm.livejournal.com/84288.html this source] as of [[411|Season 4, episode 11]] Kara Thrace believes herself to be a Cylon, whilst Katee Sackhoff believes otherwise}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Virtual beings]]===&lt;br /&gt;
The virtual beings (possibly including the [[virtual Leoben]]) may actually be a single entity, the final Cylon being more spiritual than corporal. Virtual Six claims to be an angel from the Cylon God, which could be roughly correlated with the &amp;quot;the five priests devoted to the one whose name cannot be spoken&amp;quot; from [[Pythia]]. The overall actions of these beings seem to be neither pro-Cylon or pro-human, which fits with the Final five being a third party in the dynamic of the battle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of the other final five members have shown similar characteristics to this, and there is no particular reason to suggest the final Cylon is greatly different from his or her four &amp;quot;siblings&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/422026/the_last_cylon_who_is_the_fifth_of.html An essay on the identity of the final Cylon]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.battlestarforum.com/showthread.php?t=387 The Final Five explained]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:A to Z]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cylons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cylons (RDM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RDM]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{POV Real}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Swozie</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>