Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Move Squad: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Move Squad
Line 19: Line 19:
:Sounds good to me :) --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 17:03, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
:Sounds good to me :) --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 17:03, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
:We're "go" here. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:10, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
:We're "go" here. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:10, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
:{{support}} I'm just gonna vote. I'll re-vote if this dosen't count. Mayber we can call this a two-day voting period in which people can still debate/call for delay/change their votes? Or is there intended to be a longer such period following the two days mentioned by Joe? --[[User:Day|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Admin]] - [http://hiver.swordofthestars.com/ SotS])</sup> 00:21, 18 July 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 05:21, 18 July 2006

Suggestion: Automatically confer move priveleges on registered users after 100 edits? --Peter Farago 12:50, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

I like that idea --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 13:44, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
100 "usefull" edits. Shane (T - C - E) 14:22, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
Ugh. I'm loathe to count up individual edits to determine "usefullness". If by "useful", you mean non-spam/vandalism I would agree (although hopefully they'd be blocked long before they hit 100). --Steelviper 14:25, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
Yes. Let us say "100 non-vandal edits". I don't know how we'd even define useful. Fixing a single typo is useful, especially if they fixed a single typo in 100 different articles. That's a lot of proof-reading. And that's a minor edit. As long as we're not looking at 100 edits to link Canadian drugs or whatever, I think we're in the clear. --Day (Talk - Admin) 15:40, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
Let's not be too picky with the criteria here. 100 non-vandal edits should suffice. Obviously, we should probably make use of the {{move}} template and appropriate categories for users under the 100 edit mark, so new users can suggest moves. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 18:09, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

LocalSettings.php Settings

$wgGroupPermissions['trusted']['move'] = true;

Final?

If there are no other objections, comments, or concerns regarding this, I would like to get this rolling. Please comment within the next 2 days, thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 14:52, 17 July 2006 (CDT)

Sounds good to me :) --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 17:03, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
We're "go" here. --Spencerian 17:10, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
Support I'm just gonna vote. I'll re-vote if this dosen't count. Mayber we can call this a two-day voting period in which people can still debate/call for delay/change their votes? Or is there intended to be a longer such period following the two days mentioned by Joe? --Day (Talk - Admin - SotS) 00:21, 18 July 2006 (CDT)