Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Links Discretion: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Links Discretion
(→‎Thought: reply)
(→‎Thought: saved current links)
Line 8: Line 8:


::I agree. Every site should be evaluated and treated equally. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:11, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
::I agree. Every site should be evaluated and treated equally. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 22:11, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
== All Links Right Now ==
These are all the links... and I am just marking them with {{tl|Support}} and {{tl|Oppose}} if this were going to happen.
Fan Sites
    * GateWorld's BSG News Page {{Support}} Sometimes has sources info
    * Galactica Station
    * Jammer's Reviews
    * Galactica Centar (Croatian)
    * Battlestar Fan Club - Germany
    * International Battlestar Galactica Topsites
    * Caprica City (German)
    * Battlestar Blog
    * Battlestar Helios (RPG)
    * Battlestar Libra RPG
    * Colonial Defence Forces
    * SciFi2U Battlestar Info and Episodes
      (edit)
Discussion Sites
    * Ragnar Anchorage Battlestar Forum
    * Hangar Deck 5
    * Galactica BS
    * Galactica Forum at Media Blvd
    * Aaron "Chief Tyrol" Douglas Forum on Media Blvd
    * Nicki "Cally" Clyne Fan Site
    * Battlestar Galactica live fan chat
    * Galactica Command Center
    * Pegasus Actual BSG forum
      (edit)
Offical Sites
    * RDM's Battlestar Blog
    * SciFi Channel's Official Battlestar Site
    * Sky One's Official Battlestar Site
      (edit)

Revision as of 03:18, 14 July 2006

Thought[edit]

I think Merv is in the right direction with this. While it has never been codified anywhere, we are an encyclopedia and episode guide -- and we are not a repository for links. Wikipedia itself has something similar: "Wikipedia is not a repository of links". Furthermore, I wouldn't mind having people scrutinize links for inclusion. For instance, editors will question an edit that is questionable and not sourced correctly, so why should we treat web links any differently? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:56, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

The BW:CP is defined for purposes of possaible links. If we were to follow the suggestion of questioning all the links provided minus the offfical sites. Having a "Nicki "Cally" Clyne Fan Site" doesn't have any encyclopedia value. "Battlestar Helios (RPG)" - we don't use an fan fiction information. RPG is non encyclopedia. We do it to one, we do it to all. --Shane (T - C - E) 22:04, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
I agree. Every site should be evaluated and treated equally. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 22:11, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

All Links Right Now[edit]

These are all the links... and I am just marking them with {{Support}} and {{Oppose}} if this were going to happen.

Fan Sites

   * GateWorld's BSG News Page  Support Sometimes has sources info
   * Galactica Station
   * Jammer's Reviews
   * Galactica Centar (Croatian)
   * Battlestar Fan Club - Germany
   * International Battlestar Galactica Topsites
   * Caprica City (German)
   * Battlestar Blog
   * Battlestar Helios (RPG)
   * Battlestar Libra RPG
   * Colonial Defence Forces
   * SciFi2U Battlestar Info and Episodes
     (edit) 

Discussion Sites

   * Ragnar Anchorage Battlestar Forum
   * Hangar Deck 5
   * Galactica BS
   * Galactica Forum at Media Blvd
   * Aaron "Chief Tyrol" Douglas Forum on Media Blvd
   * Nicki "Cally" Clyne Fan Site
   * Battlestar Galactica live fan chat
   * Galactica Command Center
   * Pegasus Actual BSG forum
     (edit) 

Offical Sites

   * RDM's Battlestar Blog
   * SciFi Channel's Official Battlestar Site
   * Sky One's Official Battlestar Site
     (edit)