Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/"Answered Questions" section: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/"Answered Questions" section
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:"Answered Questions" belong in "Analysis", in redacted form. Having inline links to them is a good idea, though. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 05:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | :"Answered Questions" belong in "Analysis", in redacted form. Having inline links to them is a good idea, though. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 05:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, having one link to an entire episode article isn't the most helpful thing. So an inline link can refer the summary (if applicable) or maybe analysis. Updating all the guides will be tons of work though :/ -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | :Yeah, having one link to an entire episode article isn't the most helpful thing. So an inline link can refer the summary (if applicable) or maybe analysis. Updating all the guides will be tons of work though :/ -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Well, we can use a hobby. [[User:Lfvoy|Lfvoy]] 06:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:00, 1 July 2009
Sometimes anwers it not just an episode, but I do like the inline ref idea. We could use the podcast ref tags that show {{Podcastref}} that shows a little note. [Answer from 33] Shane (talk) 05:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- "Answered Questions" belong in "Analysis", in redacted form. Having inline links to them is a good idea, though. --Peter Farago 05:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, having one link to an entire episode article isn't the most helpful thing. So an inline link can refer the summary (if applicable) or maybe analysis. Updating all the guides will be tons of work though :/ -- Serenity 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, we can use a hobby. Lfvoy 06:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)