Battlestar Wiki talk:About: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:About
(Remove cleanup tag from talk page; Battlestar Wiki talk talk is a bad namespace idea.)
(→‎Wiki-history?: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:


I'm thinking that this page should mirror [[:md:Battlestar Wiki Media:Welcome|our welcome page at BWM]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 10:37, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
I'm thinking that this page should mirror [[:md:Battlestar Wiki Media:Welcome|our welcome page at BWM]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 10:37, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
== Wiki-history? ==
I wonder if this S4 break would be a good time to document the history of the wiki. You know, from the earliest days when Joe started it, the great sysop expansion, the various incarnations of the main page design, the portals and other navigation, the incorporation of the blog, the various buyout overtures, our evolving hardware platform, etc. While we might not be a notable site as far as some are concerned, I'd say it'd be relevant here. I'm not sure if a simple timeline (with some images sprinkled in) would be superior to a narrative or not. Anybody interested? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:55, 3 July 2008

Query? Redirect? :-) --Shane (T - C - E) 21:09, 22 August 2006 (CDT)

Had the wrong tab open... lol. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:25, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
heh. I think this page needs a serious "re-do" anyway. :-) --Shane (T - C - E) 21:29, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
i definitely agree. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:49, 22 August 2006 (CDT)

I'm thinking that this page should mirror our welcome page at BWM. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 10:37, 23 August 2006 (CDT)

Wiki-history?

I wonder if this S4 break would be a good time to document the history of the wiki. You know, from the earliest days when Joe started it, the great sysop expansion, the various incarnations of the main page design, the portals and other navigation, the incorporation of the blog, the various buyout overtures, our evolving hardware platform, etc. While we might not be a notable site as far as some are concerned, I'd say it'd be relevant here. I'm not sure if a simple timeline (with some images sprinkled in) would be superior to a narrative or not. Anybody interested? --Steelviper 18:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)