User talk:Steelviper/Archive2 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

2025-06-24T20:13:13Z

Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 24 June 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:

	{\| class="messagebox"		{\| class="messagebox"
	\|[[~~Image~~:NBSG-AdmiralPin.jpg\|80px]]		\|[[File:NBSG-AdmiralPin.jpg\|80px]]
	\| Thank you for participating in my [[BW:RFA\|RfA]], which passed with a tally of '''7/0/0'''. Thank you very much for your support. I'll continue to keep up the good work, and if I can help you with anything, don't hesitate to contact me. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 15:59, 21 April 2007 (CDT)		\| Thank you for participating in my [[BW:RFA\|RfA]], which passed with a tally of '''7/0/0'''. Thank you very much for your support. I'll continue to keep up the good work, and if I can help you with anything, don't hesitate to contact me. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 15:59, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
	\|}		\|}

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:23Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: tweak

2010-01-30T02:56:15Z

tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 30 January 2010
Line 177:		Line 177:
	*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)		*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)

	O.K. Heres the deal, I do my work, you concentrate on your own. Let other admistrators deal with my work and nothing more shall be said. I, also am a creul man, but I have a better way of saying it. Maybe all it should have took it to show me direction with purpose, like Spencerian, because, as Agent Smith stated "Without perpose, we have nothing".--[[jetstorm316\|jetstorm316]]		O.K. Heres the deal, I do my work, you concentrate on your own. Let other admistrators deal with my work and nothing more shall be said. I, also am a creul man, but I have a better way of saying it. Maybe all it should have took it to show me direction with purpose, like Spencerian, because, as Agent Smith stated "Without perpose, we have nothing".--[[user:jetstorm316\|jetstorm316]]

	: I don't know how you're not getting this point, Jetsotrm: Merv didn't destroy anything you created. And, anyway, entropy is just kind of the way that Wikis work, so no malice should be held about someone editing after you. Once you put something up it is no longer yours. It becomes ours (which includes anyone who logs in to edit). --[[User:Day\|Day]] 05:02, 22 February 2006 (EST)		: I don't know how you're not getting this point, Jetsotrm: Merv didn't destroy anything you created. And, anyway, entropy is just kind of the way that Wikis work, so no malice should be held about someone editing after you. Once you put something up it is no longer yours. It becomes ours (which includes anyone who logs in to edit). --[[User:Day\|Day]] 05:02, 22 February 2006 (EST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: fixing link to get rid of the entry on Special:Wantedpages

2007-10-13T05:02:57Z

fixing link to get rid of the entry on Special:Wantedpages

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 13 October 2007
Line 173:		Line 173:
	PS - Thank you for being a neutral party in this matter.(Damn your good for your age, I'm 27!) --Jetstorm316		PS - Thank you for being a neutral party in this matter.(Damn your good for your age, I'm 27!) --Jetstorm316

	:You have, I think, perhaps walked into a potentially huge "opportunity" (read pile of work). I'm not sure if there is a simple place to stick all of your contributions yet, as I think the current structure might not yet be where it needs to be. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] suggested the military ranks (RDM, and TOS). That might do for a start, but your article made me realize that we don't have a Uniforms (TOS) page describing (and displaying images related to) the Original Series uniforms. If a Uniforms (TOS) is warranted, then potentially the TOS patches and insignia could go in a patches and insignia section on that article, with RDM patches and insignia going in a new section of a (newly moved?) Uniforms (RDM). The existing Uniforms page is in desperate need of color (images) anyway, and having (verified) patches to display would be a potential way to start that process. That's just one guy's idea, though. I'd recommend asking this same question over at [[Talk:~~Colonial arm patches and insignia~~\|the article talk page]] or on the [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|admin noticeboard]] to get the opinions of some others. I'm sure if we all put our heads together, we can come up with something. (Don't worry about your work "disappearing" suddenly. Spencerian wasn't ACTUALLY deleting yet, he was just trying to start THIS exact discussion. The article you created will not be deleted until we've figured out where everything should go and is everything is in place.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:17, 21 February 2006 (EST)		:You have, I think, perhaps walked into a potentially huge "opportunity" (read pile of work). I'm not sure if there is a simple place to stick all of your contributions yet, as I think the current structure might not yet be where it needs to be. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] suggested the military ranks (RDM, and TOS). That might do for a start, but your article made me realize that we don't have a Uniforms (TOS) page describing (and displaying images related to) the Original Series uniforms. If a Uniforms (TOS) is warranted, then potentially the TOS patches and insignia could go in a patches and insignia section on that article, with RDM patches and insignia going in a new section of a (newly moved?) Uniforms (RDM). The existing Uniforms page is in desperate need of color (images) anyway, and having (verified) patches to display would be a potential way to start that process. That's just one guy's idea, though. I'd recommend asking this same question over at [[Talk:Insignia (RDM)\|the article talk page]] or on the [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|admin noticeboard]] to get the opinions of some others. I'm sure if we all put our heads together, we can come up with something. (Don't worry about your work "disappearing" suddenly. Spencerian wasn't ACTUALLY deleting yet, he was just trying to start THIS exact discussion. The article you created will not be deleted until we've figured out where everything should go and is everything is in place.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:17, 21 February 2006 (EST)

	*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)		*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)

ArchiveBot: Archiving 6 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper. (ARCHIVE FULL)

2007-06-16T15:08:20Z

Archiving 6 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper. (ARCHIVE FULL)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 16 June 2007
Line 220:		Line 220:
	::::Generally we're pretty cautious about handing out indefinite blocks. However, I guess a 10+ strikes and you're out policy probably wouldn't be considered all that rash. I was tempted to do indefinite blocks on these guys earlier, but I was pretty annoyed at the time and didn't want to rush to judgement. However, since a voice of reason agrees (and I've had some time to cool off) then I'll set about with the block fest. It'll take a bit... --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:47, 10 March 2006 (CST)		::::Generally we're pretty cautious about handing out indefinite blocks. However, I guess a 10+ strikes and you're out policy probably wouldn't be considered all that rash. I was tempted to do indefinite blocks on these guys earlier, but I was pretty annoyed at the time and didn't want to rush to judgement. However, since a voice of reason agrees (and I've had some time to cool off) then I'll set about with the block fest. It'll take a bit... --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:47, 10 March 2006 (CST)
	:::::Done. (Also... I'm archiving, so everything older than this thread is getting wiped. Don't be alarmed.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:09, 10 March 2006 (CST)		:::::Done. (Also... I'm archiving, so everything older than this thread is getting wiped. Don't be alarmed.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:09, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			== Error Message ==

			I got this error message when saving the miniseries page yesterday, what does it mean?

			Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 37704 bytes) in /home/admin/domains/battlestarwiki.org/public_html/en/languages/LanguageUtf8.php on line 92 --Grafix
			:You've got me. I'll copy the question to Joe and see if he has any ideas. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:05, 9 March 2006 (CST)


			== Note to Self ==

			When going on a blocking spree... don't start with yourself. It is interesting to note that the block in no way affects your ability to block, however. You just can't edit. Sometimes you have to learn things the hard way. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:33, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			*LOL--Zareck Rocks 15:03, 10 March 2006 (CST)

			== Japanese articles ==

			Hey SV, as you already know I have been creating some articles in Japanese. When I was just starting I made a couple mistakes. Unfortunately I messed up the titles of the pages, so we have links to pages that really aren't needed and should be, if I may quote from Stewie, "Eliminated." Here are the links that I would appreciate being destroyed:

			:1)

			:2)

			::These links were created incorrectly. #1 has a space between the jp: and the title, I did not do that on any of the other episode guide titles. It can be redirected to this link if you can't eliminate the page: [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I/jp:あんたの負担を落とす, 部分一]]. #2 is incorrect because Part I does not jive with the ending of the title in Japanese: 部分 (ニ)=2. So the second link if it can't be destroyed can be redirected to: [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II/jp:あんたの負担を落とす, 部分ニ].

			Thanks a lot for your assistance!--Zareck Rocks 17:59, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			:By your command. (You may want to delete the dead links now that they've been "Eliminated.") --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 18:18, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			::Thanks a lot! --Zareck Rocks 18:20, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			:::Sorry, I found another page I needed deleted: [[The Captain's Hand/jp: 艦長の針]].
			::::Not a problem. That's what we do. Looks like you're making a lot of ground. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 22:12, 10 March 2006 (CST)

			== Podcast, Res. Ship, Part 1, Act 4 ==

			Great work with the podcast transcription, SV! Something so minor that I hate to even mention it, but for the multipart episodes I use [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/episodes Sci Fi's episode list] as my guide for the titling of episodes (i.e. using Part 1 and 2 instead of Part I and II). So when I verified your podcast, I changed the "I's" and "II's" to "One's" or "Two's" and used the long hand version just to err on the side of caution with regards to the [[Battlestar_Wiki:Standards_and_Conventions#Spelling_and_Numbers\|Standards and Conventions]]. If I'm in error, let me know. -- [[User:Laineylain\|Laineylain]] 22:35, 16 March 2006 (CST)

			:Sounds fine! I'm used to working back in the dusty stacks of the TOS episode guides, where they still use Roman numerals (and some of them speak in latin, greek, or aramaic). I've got no problems with you bringing the notation into the 21st century. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:03, 17 March 2006 (CST)


			== Table of Contents ==

			Hi.. I'm new here, I hope this is right place to ask this question: I'm trying to translate episode guide to Turkish. But I'm not axactly capable of editing this wiki.. So the problem is, when I tried to edit "Table of Contents" section, I can't manage it .Why I can't edit TOC whic I created? I can't find any template around here, too? Can you help me?
			: The TOC is created when you do <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>, but it bases it's information off the headers. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 05:34, 21 March 2006 (CST)

			:: OK.. I think I get it, I get it wrong at first I think. Thank you s much!

			== Steelviper / Steel viper ==

			Mmm :-/ [[User talk:Steel viper]] --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 09:22, 11 December 2006 (CST)
			:I noticed that when the user first signed up. I was alert for "impersonating an admin" type actions, but didn't really see anything along those lines. I don't imagine it will be much of a problem unless that user becomes more active. Your suggestion was appropriate as switching names is probably as much in their best interest as it is the wiki's. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:31, 11 December 2006 (CST)

ArchiveBot: Archiving 1 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

2007-06-16T15:07:13Z

Archiving 1 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 16 June 2007
Line 211:		Line 211:
	::::::::That's what I figured. I guess the checkuser showed too dynamic an ip range to range block? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (CST)		::::::::That's what I figured. I guess the checkuser showed too dynamic an ip range to range block? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (CST)
	:::::::::Actually, it didn't show me any IPs at all, which I found quite odd. I have to find out why. But in the meantime, this is a much better system. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] 16:10, 10 March 2006 (CST)		:::::::::Actually, it didn't show me any IPs at all, which I found quite odd. I have to find out why. But in the meantime, this is a much better system. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] 16:10, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			== Welcome to BSG ==

			Welcome to the BSG Wiki, Steelviper! Be sure to fill in your User page sometime to introduce yourself! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:26, 26 October 2005 (EDT)
			:User page created (albeit quite spartan). Thanks for the encouragement.--[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:52, 27 October 2005 (EDT)
			There's quite a lot of spamming going on. Could they all be the same person? Why would anyone do that?, it's not clever.--[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 18:20, 9 March 2006 (EST)
			::Likely the same person or small group of people. The [[Special:Ipblocklist\|IP Block List]] shows multiple attempts at accessing after the blocks. And (as you've probably noticed) it's all the same junk. I'm surprised they don't move on to less heavily patrolled waters. This place is pretty active, and their changed are undone fairly quickly (unless they're happy having the links in the history). I've dropped Joe a note, so hopefully it'll get dealt with). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:07, 9 March 2006 (CST)
			:::Perhaps the expiry date of the blocks should be moved from 'a week' to 'indefinitely.'--[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (EST)
			::::Generally we're pretty cautious about handing out indefinite blocks. However, I guess a 10+ strikes and you're out policy probably wouldn't be considered all that rash. I was tempted to do indefinite blocks on these guys earlier, but I was pretty annoyed at the time and didn't want to rush to judgement. However, since a voice of reason agrees (and I've had some time to cool off) then I'll set about with the block fest. It'll take a bit... --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:47, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			:::::Done. (Also... I'm archiving, so everything older than this thread is getting wiped. Don't be alarmed.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:09, 10 March 2006 (CST)

ArchiveBot: Archiving 18 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

2007-06-16T15:05:48Z

Archiving 18 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

Show changes

Shane at 14:57, 16 June 2007

2007-06-16T14:57:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 16 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{archive-message\|newarchive=}}		{{archive-message\|newarchive=3}}

	== [[User:StarNeptune]] ==		== [[User:StarNeptune]] ==

ArchiveBot: Archiving 8 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

2007-06-16T14:51:53Z

Archiving 8 thread(s) from User talk:Steelviper.

New page

{{archive-message|newarchive=}}

== [[User:StarNeptune]] ==

Coincidentally, I just noticed your comment to this user on recent changes. That StarNeptune is almost certainly an impostor: I have never met the real StarNeptune in reality, only on Wookieepedia. That user is most likely a serial vandal from Wookieepedia and Wikipedia who's gone around impersonating and harassing people on other wikis. I don't know if you have checkuser, but if you do you'll likely find that the StarNeptune you were talking to is using either an open proxy or an ISP in Italy.

If you want, you can leave a message for StarNeptune on Wookieepedia to confirm this. Cheers, —[[User: Silly Dan|Silly Dan]] [[User talk:Silly Dan|(talk)]] 11:14, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
:Whoops. I have the unfortunate habit of taking people at their word most of the time, and I occasionally get burned. I don't have checkuser, but I'll keep a close eye on that user. Thanks for the heads up. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:29, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

:I ''do'' have checkuser, and will try to make a cursory check on this user and let you know. There is no policy for user names between wikis, but there ''is'' a policy on inpersonating someone, which this user is obviously doing. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:23, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for the help cleaning up the Kobol links after the split. Much appreciated. There's a ton of them! [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:02, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
:No, thank you! Such mopping is pretty much expected of sysops, but it's guys like you that help keep this place running. Speaking of which... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:37, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

::I have offered him the [[Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/JubalHarshaw|red mop]], but he must ''choose'' to mop with it... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 18:28, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
== Minor Changes to Act 4 of podcast for Crossroads, Part II ==

I just wanted to let you know that I reviewed act 4 of the transcript for [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II|Crossroads, Part II]] and made a couple of changes. I included time clauses to let you know at what point in the podcast they took place so you could rereview them if you so chose. The only edit, of the two, I think you might dispute with was a change where RDM is talking about people not wanting to use the Galactic zoom-out shot at the end of the epi. You had "The people- at work wanted to drop it at one point. I think David wanted to drop it at one point." I changed it to: "The people- '''the network''' wanted to drop it at one point. I think David wanted to drop it at one point." He kind of mumbles the words but I believe he says network but it really could be either one so if you disagree with my edit I have no qualms about changing it back, but I wanted to give you a heads up about the edit. BTW RDM says this at 47:22 in the podcast, since i was bringing it up here in your talk page I thought I'd give you the time to reply here as well.--[[User:Zarek Rocks|Zarek Rocks]] 11:38, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
:Ahhh. That's right. My effort was a "best guess" that was one step above an (unintelligible)... I could tell I wasn't quite right but I couldn't quite nail it down. I think you got it. Thanks! --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:07, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

== Have a good vacation! ==

Matt, enjoy your vacation! :-D -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] [[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] 18:37, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

== My RFA ==

{| class="messagebox"
|[[Image:NBSG-AdmiralPin.jpg|80px]]
| Thank you for participating in my [[BW:RFA|RfA]], which passed with a tally of '''7/0/0'''. Thank you very much for your support. I'll continue to keep up the good work, and if I can help you with anything, don't hesitate to contact me. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:59, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
|}

== Frak Party podcast ==

I've transcribed the first 27 minutes of the [[Podcast:Frak Party Q and A|Frak Party Q&A podcast]], and I'm looking for some verification. As you see, we have no reservations about putting you right back to work ;)

BTW, how was Mexico? --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]]) 08:35, 1 May 2007 (CDT)
:Can do. I'll try to take a listen to it later this morning.

:Mexico was relaxing. It was good timing as well, as I'm wrapping up my last three weeks of my current job before we move (and I transition into a full-time dad). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:38, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

== [[User:StarNeptune]] request ==

Though the user in question hasn't edited anything other than their userpage, I really must ask again that that username be blocked and (at least) that the userpage be deleted. Your [[Battlestar Wiki:Blocking policy|blocking policy]] does state that users may be blocked for "personal details of other users without their consent ... whether the personal details are accurate or not." In this case, the user has posted inaccurate details about me (i.e. claiming to be my girlfriend) and both accurate and inaccurate details about another identifiable person (name, age, and province of residence of the StarNeptune from another wiki, plus the obvious inaccurate claims.) Thanks, —[[User: Silly Dan|Silly Dan]] [[User talk:Silly Dan|(talk)]] 06:57, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
:Done. Next time please contact us on the [[BW:AN]] page so everyone can see it. Thanks ;) [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]]) 07:00, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

== Horray! ==

Horray for DSL! -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] [[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New''] 17:05, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
:Welcome back. As you can see on the front page, there's a bit of news.... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:46, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
::Thanks. I guess it's finally official (I wonder if EJO or Katee were flogged for spilling the beans). I can't say I'm that upset to see a show go out on its own terms. It'd be like B5 actually ending after Season 4 (or getting to go all through season 5 as originally intended). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 20:53, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
:::Which was [http://forums.scifi.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=2276767&view=findpost&p=3474219 exactly my sentiment], which Mrs. Ron agreed to (as well as others with the level heads on Skiffy. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 21:09, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 30 January 2010
Line 177:		Line 177:
	*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)		*Need I point out, once again, that I am not the one that "slapped this article down", but that Spencerian and SteelViper were both deleting it, and I simply deleted some links to it? I do not want to argue, but I hope you can agree SteelViper, that I should not appreciate baseless accusations. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:35, 22 February 2006 (EST)

	O.K. Heres the deal, I do my work, you concentrate on your own. Let other admistrators deal with my work and nothing more shall be said. I, also am a creul man, but I have a better way of saying it. Maybe all it should have took it to show me direction with purpose, like Spencerian, because, as Agent Smith stated "Without perpose, we have nothing".--[[jetstorm316\|jetstorm316]]		O.K. Heres the deal, I do my work, you concentrate on your own. Let other admistrators deal with my work and nothing more shall be said. I, also am a creul man, but I have a better way of saying it. Maybe all it should have took it to show me direction with purpose, like Spencerian, because, as Agent Smith stated "Without perpose, we have nothing".--[[user:jetstorm316\|jetstorm316]]

	: I don't know how you're not getting this point, Jetsotrm: Merv didn't destroy anything you created. And, anyway, entropy is just kind of the way that Wikis work, so no malice should be held about someone editing after you. Once you put something up it is no longer yours. It becomes ours (which includes anyone who logs in to edit). --[[User:Day\|Day]] 05:02, 22 February 2006 (EST)		: I don't know how you're not getting this point, Jetsotrm: Merv didn't destroy anything you created. And, anyway, entropy is just kind of the way that Wikis work, so no malice should be held about someone editing after you. Once you put something up it is no longer yours. It becomes ours (which includes anyone who logs in to edit). --[[User:Day\|Day]] 05:02, 22 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 16 June 2007
Line 211:		Line 211:
	::::::::That's what I figured. I guess the checkuser showed too dynamic an ip range to range block? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (CST)		::::::::That's what I figured. I guess the checkuser showed too dynamic an ip range to range block? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (CST)
	:::::::::Actually, it didn't show me any IPs at all, which I found quite odd. I have to find out why. But in the meantime, this is a much better system. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] 16:10, 10 March 2006 (CST)		:::::::::Actually, it didn't show me any IPs at all, which I found quite odd. I have to find out why. But in the meantime, this is a much better system. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] 16:10, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			== Welcome to BSG ==

			Welcome to the BSG Wiki, Steelviper! Be sure to fill in your User page sometime to introduce yourself! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:26, 26 October 2005 (EDT)
			:User page created (albeit quite spartan). Thanks for the encouragement.--[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:52, 27 October 2005 (EDT)
			There's quite a lot of spamming going on. Could they all be the same person? Why would anyone do that?, it's not clever.--[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 18:20, 9 March 2006 (EST)
			::Likely the same person or small group of people. The [[Special:Ipblocklist\|IP Block List]] shows multiple attempts at accessing after the blocks. And (as you've probably noticed) it's all the same junk. I'm surprised they don't move on to less heavily patrolled waters. This place is pretty active, and their changed are undone fairly quickly (unless they're happy having the links in the history). I've dropped Joe a note, so hopefully it'll get dealt with). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:07, 9 March 2006 (CST)
			:::Perhaps the expiry date of the blocks should be moved from 'a week' to 'indefinitely.'--[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (EST)
			::::Generally we're pretty cautious about handing out indefinite blocks. However, I guess a 10+ strikes and you're out policy probably wouldn't be considered all that rash. I was tempted to do indefinite blocks on these guys earlier, but I was pretty annoyed at the time and didn't want to rush to judgement. However, since a voice of reason agrees (and I've had some time to cool off) then I'll set about with the block fest. It'll take a bit... --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:47, 10 March 2006 (CST)
			:::::Done. (Also... I'm archiving, so everything older than this thread is getting wiped. Don't be alarmed.) --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:09, 10 March 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 67:		Line 67:
	First off, although I am not personally a fan of TOS, I want to commend you for your contributions to those pages here. I think our site has benifited immensely during the relatively short time you've been active here.		First off, although I am not personally a fan of TOS, I want to commend you for your contributions to those pages here. I think our site has benifited immensely during the relatively short time you've been active here.

	Secondly, I note that there is a quite a dearth of good illustrative screen captures from TOS episodes. To that end, I would like to offer to donate a copy of the TOS DVD box set to you via Amazon.com or somesuch. Let me know if this would be useful. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 19:30, 22 December 2005 (EST)		Secondly, I note that there is a quite a dearth of good illustrative screen captures from TOS episodes. To that end, I would like to offer to donate a copy of the TOS DVD box set to you via Amazon.com or somesuch. Let me know if this would be useful. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 19:30, 22 December 2005 (EST)

	:Thanks! I appreciate the thought. "[[Imperious Leader\|Santa Claus]]" already beat you to the punch, though. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 08:05, 28 December 2005 (EST) (Updated)		:Thanks! I appreciate the thought. "[[Imperious Leader\|Santa Claus]]" already beat you to the punch, though. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 08:05, 28 December 2005 (EST) (Updated)
Line 81:		Line 81:
	You are now an admin! If you have any questions, feel free to bring them to me or any of your fellow admins. So say we all. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 21:24, 3 January 2006 (EST)		You are now an admin! If you have any questions, feel free to bring them to me or any of your fellow admins. So say we all. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 21:24, 3 January 2006 (EST)

	:Welcome to the clubhouse. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:37, 3 January 2006 (EST)		:Welcome to the clubhouse. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:37, 3 January 2006 (EST)

	:Since you're the new kid, you have to do the mopping. Congrats! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 01:44, 4 January 2006 (EST)		:Since you're the new kid, you have to do the mopping. Congrats! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 01:44, 4 January 2006 (EST)
Line 93:		Line 93:
	Hi Steelviper. Send me an email at weller43@cox.net so I can confirm for you that the site you mentioned is mine. - Mark Weller [[User:Mokwella\|Mokwella]] 23:24, 3 January 2006 (EST)		Hi Steelviper. Send me an email at weller43@cox.net so I can confirm for you that the site you mentioned is mine. - Mark Weller [[User:Mokwella\|Mokwella]] 23:24, 3 January 2006 (EST)

	:Since Joe, as host, is ultimately the liable party, it would probably be best to go directly to him. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:58, 4 January 2006 (EST)		:Since Joe, as host, is ultimately the liable party, it would probably be best to go directly to him. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:58, 4 January 2006 (EST)

	::I didn't mean to stir anything up when I linked to your site. I just stumbled across it, as there isn't that much that comes up on a Google search for "Galactica 1980 dvd". Hopefully after you've emailed Joe everything will be clear. Sorry for any inconvenience. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:01, 4 January 2006 (EST)		::I didn't mean to stir anything up when I linked to your site. I just stumbled across it, as there isn't that much that comes up on a Google search for "Galactica 1980 dvd". Hopefully after you've emailed Joe everything will be clear. Sorry for any inconvenience. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:01, 4 January 2006 (EST)
Line 105:		Line 105:
	:: Oh, I didn't make [[The Fleet (TOS)]]. Someone else split up The Fleet into the RDM and TOS name-spaces. I'm just currently purging Fleet since nearly all of those should be double-redirects. I'm not done, either, but I'm getting there. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 15:19, 16 January 2006 (EST)		:: Oh, I didn't make [[The Fleet (TOS)]]. Someone else split up The Fleet into the RDM and TOS name-spaces. I'm just currently purging Fleet since nearly all of those should be double-redirects. I'm not done, either, but I'm getting there. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 15:19, 16 January 2006 (EST)

	:::I think ~~Peter Farago~~ and Spencerian were primarily responsible for making the change. I just saw you were doing a lot of Fleet redirect work.--[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:22, 16 January 2006 (EST)		:::I think April Arcus and Spencerian were primarily responsible for making the change. I just saw you were doing a lot of Fleet redirect work.--[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:22, 16 January 2006 (EST)

	:::: Heh. I forgot the links would be bad. Anyway... yes. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 19:09, 16 January 2006 (EST)		:::: Heh. I forgot the links would be bad. Anyway... yes. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 19:09, 16 January 2006 (EST)
Line 138:		Line 138:
	Hi, I don't know how much use I can be around the rest of the site (I'm not very tehnical-minded) but I love transcribing things (I must be mad) and so I'm happy to do as many of them as I can for you. Don't hesitiate to correct me if I mess something up too, like I said, I'm not brilliant with computers. Anyway thanks for saying hi. --[[User:Misco\|Misco]] 15:40, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Hi, I don't know how much use I can be around the rest of the site (I'm not very tehnical-minded) but I love transcribing things (I must be mad) and so I'm happy to do as many of them as I can for you. Don't hesitiate to correct me if I mess something up too, like I said, I'm not brilliant with computers. Anyway thanks for saying hi. --[[User:Misco\|Misco]] 15:40, 14 February 2006 (EST)

	:You're welcome! Usually that job falls to [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]]. (In fact his initial greeting is still at the top of this page, as I don't get enough traffic to require archiving.) I jumped at the opportunity to welcome a new transcriber, though! I've tried doing it myself (though I managed to lose my work), but find that my OCD-like compulsion to get EVERY SINGLE sound (including the filler um's, ah's, sort of's) slows me WAY down. It amazes me when I get a chance to read transcriptions of people like yourself and [[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] that have excellent filters that clear out all that junk leaving only the good stuff. Feel free to contribute in whatever ways you are comfortable! As with any wiki, the more the merrier. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:47, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:You're welcome! Usually that job falls to [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]]. (In fact his initial greeting is still at the top of this page, as I don't get enough traffic to require archiving.) I jumped at the opportunity to welcome a new transcriber, though! I've tried doing it myself (though I managed to lose my work), but find that my OCD-like compulsion to get EVERY SINGLE sound (including the filler um's, ah's, sort of's) slows me WAY down. It amazes me when I get a chance to read transcriptions of people like yourself and [[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] that have excellent filters that clear out all that junk leaving only the good stuff. Feel free to contribute in whatever ways you are comfortable! As with any wiki, the more the merrier. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:47, 14 February 2006 (EST)

	== Printed Media Copyrights ==		== Printed Media Copyrights ==