User talk:RMelon - Revision history

Spencerian: /* Recent rollback */

2007-02-01T17:03:24Z

Recent rollback

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 1 February 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)		Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)
	:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon\|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)		:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon\|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)
			::That's good, too, I think. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)

RMelon: /* Recent rollback */

2007-02-01T16:08:04Z

Recent rollback

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 1 February 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)		Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)
			:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon\|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Spencerian: Recent rollback

2007-02-01T14:57:42Z

Recent rollback

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 1 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	We look forward to your contributions to the community!		We look forward to your contributions to the community!
	--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:35, 31 January 2007 (CST)		--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:35, 31 January 2007 (CST)

			== Recent rollback ==

			Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Catrope: Welcome

2007-01-31T18:35:56Z

Welcome

New page

== Welcome to Battlestar Wiki! ==
Welcome to the Wiki, RMelon. Feel free to tell us about yourself on [[User:RMelon|your user page]]. Before you get started on other edits, please read the [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions|Standards and Conventions]], which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the [[BW:TUT|tutorial]] and the [[BW:MARK|wiki markup code]] pages for assistance.

Please read the articles [[Battlestar Wiki:What is Battlestar Wiki|"What is Battlestar Wiki"]] and [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not|"What Battlestar Wiki is Not."]] This important information details what contributions are acceptable in this encyclopedia.

We encourage you to participate in any [[Battlestar Wiki:Project List|projects]] on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the [[Battlestar Wiki:Original Series Article Development Project|Original Series Article Development Project]] and several [[Battlestar Wiki:Translation Project|language translations of Battlestar Wiki]]. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]], where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.

Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|the Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)!

We look forward to your contributions to the community!
--[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 12:35, 31 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 1 February 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)		Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)
	:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon\|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)		:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon\|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)
			::That's good, too, I think. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)