User talk:Philwelch - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:39:12Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Your fight with [[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]]==		==Your fight with [[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]]==

	Gentlemen: rather than reverting each other's edits on [[Cylons (RDM)\|Cylons]], please attempt a civilized discussion on the article's [[Talk:Cylons\|talk page]]. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:04, 31 August 2005 (EDT)		Gentlemen: rather than reverting each other's edits on [[Cylons (RDM)\|Cylons]], please attempt a civilized discussion on the article's [[Talk:Cylons\|talk page]]. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:04, 31 August 2005 (EDT)

	== Character Data Template ==		== Character Data Template ==

Catrope: /* Rollback: The Music */ citing is good

2007-04-19T21:31:54Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]: citing is good

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 19 April 2007
Line 63:		Line 63:
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
	:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::::Citing is always good, and never unnecessary. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:31, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Philwelch: /* Rollback: The Music */

2007-04-19T21:08:59Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 19 April 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
	:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Philwelch: /* Rollback: The Music */

2007-04-19T21:06:33Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 19 April 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
			:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Rollback: The Music */ +On adjustments

2007-04-19T21:04:06Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]: +On adjustments

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 19 April 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>

Philwelch: /* Rollback: The Music */

2007-04-19T21:01:46Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 19 April 2007
Line 60:		Line 60:
	::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast)		::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast)
	::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Rollback: The Music */ minor grammar

2007-04-19T21:00:12Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]: minor grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 19 April 2007
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::If there's self-argumentation, it may be RDM's fault anyway:		::If there's self-argumentation, it may be RDM's fault anyway:
	::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast)		::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast)
	::So he saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Rollback: The Music */ RDM says...

2007-04-19T20:59:49Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]: RDM says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 19 April 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	:I never said the music's source was earth, and it doesn't make the article self-argumentative. There is no contradiction.		:I never said the music's source was earth, and it doesn't make the article self-argumentative. There is no contradiction.
	'''Please do not revert my contribution again''', '''especially''' since I've added an outside source. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 15:40, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		'''Please do not revert my contribution again''', '''especially''' since I've added an outside source. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 15:40, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			::If there's self-argumentation, it may be RDM's fault anyway:
			::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast)
			::So he saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Philwelch: /* Rollback: The Music */

2007-04-19T20:42:55Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 19 April 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:
	Philwelch, I rolled back your additions to this article because (1) the edits make the article self-argumentative, which is against our [[BW:SAC\|conventions policy]], and (2) [[Ron D. Moore]] has noted in his [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|last podcast]] and in interviews that the music ''does'' have a cosmic source, but it's not Earth itself. We shouldn't "defy" what the series creator says in this matter. '''Please do not re-add this contribution.''' -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 09:51, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		Philwelch, I rolled back your additions to this article because (1) the edits make the article self-argumentative, which is against our [[BW:SAC\|conventions policy]], and (2) [[Ron D. Moore]] has noted in his [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|last podcast]] and in interviews that the music ''does'' have a cosmic source, but it's not Earth itself. We shouldn't "defy" what the series creator says in this matter. '''Please do not re-add this contribution.''' -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 09:51, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
	:I never said the music's source was earth, and it doesn't make the article self-argumentative. There is no contradiction.		:I never said the music's source was earth, and it doesn't make the article self-argumentative. There is no contradiction.
	'''Please do not revert my contribution again''', '''especially'' since I've added an outside source. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 15:40, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		'''Please do not revert my contribution again''', '''especially''' since I've added an outside source. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 15:40, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Philwelch: /* Rollback: The Music */

2007-04-19T20:40:02Z

Rollback: [[The Music]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 19 April 2007
Line 55:		Line 55:

	Philwelch, I rolled back your additions to this article because (1) the edits make the article self-argumentative, which is against our [[BW:SAC\|conventions policy]], and (2) [[Ron D. Moore]] has noted in his [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|last podcast]] and in interviews that the music ''does'' have a cosmic source, but it's not Earth itself. We shouldn't "defy" what the series creator says in this matter. '''Please do not re-add this contribution.''' -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 09:51, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		Philwelch, I rolled back your additions to this article because (1) the edits make the article self-argumentative, which is against our [[BW:SAC\|conventions policy]], and (2) [[Ron D. Moore]] has noted in his [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|last podcast]] and in interviews that the music ''does'' have a cosmic source, but it's not Earth itself. We shouldn't "defy" what the series creator says in this matter. '''Please do not re-add this contribution.''' -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 09:51, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
			:I never said the music's source was earth, and it doesn't make the article self-argumentative. There is no contradiction.
			'''Please do not revert my contribution again''', '''especially'' since I've added an outside source. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 15:40, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 19 April 2007
Line 63:		Line 63:
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
	:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::::Citing is always good, and never unnecessary. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:31, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 19 April 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
	:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 19 April 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>		::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
			:::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 19 April 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
	:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)		:::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian\|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian\|Edit Skillz]])</sup>