User talk:Noneofyourbusiness - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "geocities.com" to "geocities.ws"

2021-10-27T17:23:26Z

Text replacement - "geocities.com" to "geocities.ws"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 27 October 2021
Line 99:		Line 99:
	Go to this webpage:		Go to this webpage:

	http://www.geocities.~~com~~/davidayton/CDisplay		http://www.geocities.ws/davidayton/CDisplay

	and click on "Download version 1.8 NOW" to get the CDisplay Sequential Image Viewer!		and click on "Download version 1.8 NOW" to get the CDisplay Sequential Image Viewer!

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:20Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:

	==Talk:Precipice==		==Talk:Precipice==
	Merv posted a lengthy comment, which I replied to. He then thought better of it and deleted it, making my reply bizarre and nonsensical, so I restored it with <nowiki><del></nowiki> tags to indicate that he'd withdrawn the opinion. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 13:28, 22 April 2006 (CDT)		Merv posted a lengthy comment, which I replied to. He then thought better of it and deleted it, making my reply bizarre and nonsensical, so I restored it with <nowiki><del></nowiki> tags to indicate that he'd withdrawn the opinion. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 13:28, 22 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Cool. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 14:09, 22 April 2006 (CDT)		:Cool. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 14:09, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

	==A Favor==		==A Favor==
	Noneofyourbusiness, I've asked a favor of you on [[User talk:The Merovingian]]. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 19:48, 22 April 2006 (CDT)		Noneofyourbusiness, I've asked a favor of you on [[User talk:The Merovingian]]. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 19:48, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

	==Minor?==		==Minor?==
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::Quite. It's not unrealistic for Baltar to have survived such a wave with cover. He was just thrown around. What killed Six wasn't even the actual shockwave, it was the shards of glass flying into her body. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:19, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		:::Quite. It's not unrealistic for Baltar to have survived such a wave with cover. He was just thrown around. What killed Six wasn't even the actual shockwave, it was the shards of glass flying into her body. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:19, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
	::::Exactly. From the windows breaking. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 17:28, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		::::Exactly. From the windows breaking. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 17:28, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Spence, what, in your mind, is the difference between an "atomic" shockwave and a "nuclear" shockwave? Are you getting at the difference between traditional fission bombs and the more powerful hydrogen bombs developed in the 50s? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:25, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		:Spence, what, in your mind, is the difference between an "atomic" shockwave and a "nuclear" shockwave? Are you getting at the difference between traditional fission bombs and the more powerful hydrogen bombs developed in the 50s? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:25, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

	== About your last edit on [[SFM]] ==		== About your last edit on [[SFM]] ==

BlueResistance: /* Punctuation */ see my talk page

2011-06-12T23:09:18Z

Punctuation: see my talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 12 June 2011
Line 132:		Line 132:

	On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)		On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

			:I posted a response to your comment. See my talk page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* Punctuation */

2011-06-11T13:03:54Z

Punctuation

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 11 June 2011
Line 131:		Line 131:
	== Punctuation ==		== Punctuation ==

	On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)		On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* Punctuation */ new section

2011-06-11T12:55:50Z

Punctuation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 11 June 2011
Line 128:		Line 128:
	I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
	:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. I thought it was important to make it clear when reverting that one is not calling the edit vandalism. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. I thought it was important to make it clear when reverting that one is not calling the edit vandalism. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

			== Punctuation ==

			On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 02:24, 2 February 2011

2011-02-02T02:24:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 2 February 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:

	I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
	:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. I thought it was important to make it clear when reverting that one is not calling the edit vandalism. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness: /* Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page */

2011-02-02T02:22:25Z

Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 2 February 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:

	I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
	:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 02:17, 2 February 2011

2011-02-02T02:17:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 2 February 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:

	I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
	:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your ~~good faith~~ edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 02:17, 2 February 2011

2011-02-02T02:17:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 2 February 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:

	I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)		I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
			:Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your good faith edit. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page */ new section

2011-02-02T01:30:17Z

Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 2 February 2011
Line 123:		Line 123:

	*Frylock86 1/29/11 2:17 PM EST.		*Frylock86 1/29/11 2:17 PM EST.

			== Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page ==

			I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)