User talk:Klesk - Revision history

Serenity: /* Spoilers */

2007-03-10T21:10:45Z

Spoilers

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 10 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	But in this case the episode summary outlines events of the following episode(s) ''without'' an answer link or such.		But in this case the episode summary outlines events of the following episode(s) ''without'' an answer link or such.
	As I understand it, these links keep the episodes apart so a reader can ''choose'' to browse any additional information outside the events of the episode.--[[User:Klesk\|Klesk]] 15:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)		As I understand it, these links keep the episodes apart so a reader can ''choose'' to browse any additional information outside the events of the episode.--[[User:Klesk\|Klesk]] 15:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)
	:I ~~don't see any spoilers~~ in the summary ~~itself~~. You marked the question section as having spoilers and one of the answers indeed gave away the existence of a second Resurrection Ship (or at least that there would be one way later). I replaced that with the standard formatting, as that shouldn't happen anyways. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:07, 10 March 2007 (CST)		:The only spoiler I found in the summary is a link to "Demand Peace" which I removed. You marked the question section as having spoilers and one of the answers indeed gave away the existence of a second Resurrection Ship (or at least that there would be one way later). I replaced that with the standard formatting, as that shouldn't happen anyways. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:07, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Serenity: /* Spoilers */

2007-03-10T21:07:27Z

Spoilers

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 10 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	But in this case the episode summary outlines events of the following episode(s) ''without'' an answer link or such.		But in this case the episode summary outlines events of the following episode(s) ''without'' an answer link or such.
	As I understand it, these links keep the episodes apart so a reader can ''choose'' to browse any additional information outside the events of the episode.--[[User:Klesk\|Klesk]] 15:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)		As I understand it, these links keep the episodes apart so a reader can ''choose'' to browse any additional information outside the events of the episode.--[[User:Klesk\|Klesk]] 15:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)
			:I don't see any spoilers in the summary itself. You marked the question section as having spoilers and one of the answers indeed gave away the existence of a second Resurrection Ship (or at least that there would be one way later). I replaced that with the standard formatting, as that shouldn't happen anyways. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:07, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Klesk at 21:00, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T21:00:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 10 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	On BSWiki a spoiler is only something that hasn't aired in the US yet. If something happened in an aired episode, but you haven't seen it, that's not a spoiler (if we went by that, everything would be a spoiler for ''someone''). You'll have to exercise some self-restraint then and not click on the answers to questions, because those will inevitably point to future episodes. You will generally be fine reading the analysis or notes sections though, as they are mostly written directly after the episode aired. That it is, if you really haven't seen the episodes yet. But even if, it's still true in general. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:22, 9 March 2007 (CST)		On BSWiki a spoiler is only something that hasn't aired in the US yet. If something happened in an aired episode, but you haven't seen it, that's not a spoiler (if we went by that, everything would be a spoiler for ''someone''). You'll have to exercise some self-restraint then and not click on the answers to questions, because those will inevitably point to future episodes. You will generally be fine reading the analysis or notes sections though, as they are mostly written directly after the episode aired. That it is, if you really haven't seen the episodes yet. But even if, it's still true in general. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:22, 9 March 2007 (CST)

			Yeah I know it's kinda given...
			But in this case the episode summary outlines events of the following episode(s) ''without'' an answer link or such.
			As I understand it, these links keep the episodes apart so a reader can ''choose'' to browse any additional information outside the events of the episode.--[[User:Klesk\|Klesk]] 15:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Serenity: Spoiler policy

2007-03-10T00:22:36Z

Spoiler policy

New page

== Spoilers ==

On BSWiki a spoiler is only something that hasn't aired in the US yet. If something happened in an aired episode, but you haven't seen it, that's not a spoiler (if we went by that, everything would be a spoiler for ''someone''). You'll have to exercise some self-restraint then and not click on the answers to questions, because those will inevitably point to future episodes. You will generally be fine reading the analysis or notes sections though, as they are mostly written directly after the episode aired. That it is, if you really haven't seen the episodes yet. But even if, it's still true in general. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:22, 9 March 2007 (CST)