User talk:Fredmdbud - Revision history

Steelviper: /* Mostly Harmless? */ new section

2009-04-10T20:08:41Z

Mostly Harmless?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 10 April 2009
Line 41:		Line 41:

	We already have a switch indicating the character itself is a FF Cylon. I doubt this is a role of the character. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 01:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)		We already have a switch indicating the character itself is a FF Cylon. I doubt this is a role of the character. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 01:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

			== Mostly Harmless? ==

			Hardly. I've watched your edits. You're a pretty detail oriented cat. Thanks for the hard work (especially with regards to the TOS stuff). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 20:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Shane: /* Correct */ new section

2008-04-08T01:52:16Z

Correct: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 8 April 2008
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}		:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
	:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

			== Correct ==

			We already have a switch indicating the character itself is a FF Cylon. I doubt this is a role of the character. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 01:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* BG vs BSG */ tweak title

2007-10-17T00:21:10Z

BG vs BSG: tweak title

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 17 October 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

	== BG vs BSG ==		== BS vs BSG ==

	Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
	:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}		:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
	:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* BG vs BSG */ reply

2007-10-17T00:08:57Z

BG vs BSG: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 17 October 2007
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
	:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS".		:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
			:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Fredmdbud: /* BG vs BSG */

2007-10-17T00:02:45Z

BG vs BSG

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 17 October 2007
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
			:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS".

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: New section: BG vs BSG

2007-10-16T23:51:55Z

New section: BG vs BSG

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 16 October 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training. {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}		::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training. {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
	:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

			== BG vs BSG ==

			Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* Grammar edits to Nugget */ reply

2007-10-03T17:17:58Z

Grammar edits to [[Nugget]]: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 3 October 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Just so you know:		Just so you know:
	* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')		* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')
	::Though that can be acceptable in colloquial spoken English, we were taught in middle- and high-school composition to keep the distinction [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/w.html]		::Though that can be acceptable in colloquial spoken English, we were taught in middle- and high-school composition to keep the distinction [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/w.html] {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
	* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".		* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".
	--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
	::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training.		::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training. {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
			:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Fredmdbud: /* Grammar edits to Nugget */

2007-10-03T15:29:05Z

Grammar edits to [[Nugget]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 3 October 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Just so you know:		Just so you know:
	* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')		* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')
	::Though that can be acceptable in colloquial spoken English, we were taught in middle- and high-school composition to keep the distinction ([[http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/w.html		::Though that can be acceptable in colloquial spoken English, we were taught in middle- and high-school composition to keep the distinction [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/w.html]
	* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".		* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".
	--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
	::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training.		::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training.

Fredmdbud: /* Grammar edits to Nugget */

2007-10-03T15:27:56Z

Grammar edits to [[Nugget]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 3 October 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Just so you know:		Just so you know:
	* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')		* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')
			::Though that can be acceptable in colloquial spoken English, we were taught in middle- and high-school composition to keep the distinction ([[http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/w.html
	* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".		* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".
	--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
			::Technically incorrect but still commonly used (similar to "irregardless") ... but is the possessive really needed in the sentence? It's usually not used in similar phrasing: The soldier completed basic training.

Catrope: New section: User talk:Fredmdbud#Grammar edits to [[Nugget|Grammar edits to Nugget]]

2007-10-03T11:56:19Z

New section: [[User talk:Fredmdbud#Grammar edits to Nugget|Grammar edits to Nugget]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 3 October 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:

	So it ''is'' water and not just a general fluid. The whole footnote doesn't make sense if we just call it "a fluid". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 19:45, 13 August 2007 (CDT)		So it ''is'' water and not just a general fluid. The whole footnote doesn't make sense if we just call it "a fluid". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 19:45, 13 August 2007 (CDT)

			== Grammar edits to [[Nugget]] ==

			Just so you know:
			* "Who" and "that" are both allowed for referring to persons. For objects, "which" and "that" are allowed (making "that" 'go both ways')
			* "Their" is not just plural, but can also be used as a gender-neutral alternative to "his" or "her".
			--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:56, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 17 October 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		:::Weird, we were taught that 'that' goes both ways... but then I'm in the Netherlands. On a side note, please sign your posts with <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> (two dashes and four tildes), which will expand to your username and a timestamp. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:17, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

	== BG vs BSG ==		== BS vs BSG ==

	Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		Hi there. Just noticed your edits to [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Pegasus (RDM)]]. Just to let you know, the prefix BS is the ''hull number'' for the battlestars in question. BSG is an acronym for [[Battlestar Group]]. I know it's a bit off-putting, particularly since both battlestars share the same number as their hull number. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:51, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
	:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}		:So what would be the appropriate prefix, BS or BG? From your notes in the history log, the landing bay plate reads "BG", but the article refers to "BS". {{unsigned\|Fredmdbud}}
	:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		:: The appropriate prefix is "BS", the way it was before in the article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:08, 16 October 2007 (CDT)