User talk:Ernestborg9 - Revision history

Fang Aili: stop signing your contributions, please

2005-09-14T13:28:46Z

stop signing your contributions, please

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 14 September 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Great! It's good to hear you're not planning on taking them down permanently. I thought they were, on the whole, quite good, so I'm interested to see where the improvements take you. Keep it up! (Don't worry about typos, they give me purpose).<br>		Great! It's good to hear you're not planning on taking them down permanently. I thought they were, on the whole, quite good, so I'm interested to see where the improvements take you. Keep it up! (Don't worry about typos, they give me purpose).<br>
	--[[User:68.206.5.70\|68.206.5.70]] 19:05, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)		--[[User:68.206.5.70\|68.206.5.70]] 19:05, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)

			== Signing your articles ==
			Please stop signing your contributions. It's against policy. No article or section of article belongs to any one person. Thank you. --[[User:Fang Aili\|Fang Aili]] 09:28, 14 September 2005 (EDT)

68.206.5.70: /* Review Removal */

2005-01-27T00:05:48Z

Review Removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 27 January 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:


	Wikipedia has a limit of 32Kb per page, and the lengthy reviews were taking it ~~wll~~ over that limit, and in testing pages on some browsers, truncation was taking place. Plus, the details I posted are forming the basis of a series of articles I'm working on in much greater depth (and less typos, as not in so much of a rush to get things populated!), so want to keep them off the Wiki for now to prevent clashes.		Wikipedia has a limit of 32Kb per page, and the lengthy reviews were taking it well over that limit, and in testing pages on some browsers, truncation was taking place. Plus, the details I posted are forming the basis of a series of articles I'm working on in much greater depth (and less typos, as not in so much of a rush to get things populated!), so want to keep them off the Wiki for now to prevent clashes.

	The bullet points also make easier reading, and I'll porbably move the analyses to the same format.		The bullet points also make easier reading, and I'll porbably move the analyses to the same format.

	Finally, it puts the pages more in keeping with the original "Lurkers" approach: informative & reasonably readable.		Finally, it puts the pages more in keeping with the original "Lurkers" approach: informative & reasonably readable.


			Great! It's good to hear you're not planning on taking them down permanently. I thought they were, on the whole, quite good, so I'm interested to see where the improvements take you. Keep it up! (Don't worry about typos, they give me purpose).<br>
			--[[User:68.206.5.70\|68.206.5.70]] 19:05, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)

Ernestborg9: /* Review Removal */

2005-01-26T21:31:51Z

Review Removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 26 January 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Hey buddy, I noticed that the lengthy reviews were getting taken out of the episode summaries. Might I ask what was the impetus of that decision?<br>		Hey buddy, I noticed that the lengthy reviews were getting taken out of the episode summaries. Might I ask what was the impetus of that decision?<br>
	--[[User:Gizmojumpjet\|Colonial Historiographer]] 14:58, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)		--[[User:Gizmojumpjet\|Colonial Historiographer]] 14:58, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)


			Wikipedia has a limit of 32Kb per page, and the lengthy reviews were taking it wll over that limit, and in testing pages on some browsers, truncation was taking place. Plus, the details I posted are forming the basis of a series of articles I'm working on in much greater depth (and less typos, as not in so much of a rush to get things populated!), so want to keep them off the Wiki for now to prevent clashes.

			The bullet points also make easier reading, and I'll porbably move the analyses to the same format.

			Finally, it puts the pages more in keeping with the original "Lurkers" approach: informative & reasonably readable.

Gizmojumpjet at 19:58, 26 January 2005

2005-01-26T19:58:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 26 January 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Best to double-check before making an entry, using the SEARCH function. I'm hoping a revisied home page that includes leading Categories will soon be up and running which will make searches easier.		Best to double-check before making an entry, using the SEARCH function. I'm hoping a revisied home page that includes leading Categories will soon be up and running which will make searches easier.

			== Review Removal ==

			Hey buddy, I noticed that the lengthy reviews were getting taken out of the episode summaries. Might I ask what was the impetus of that decision?<br>
			--[[User:Gizmojumpjet\|Colonial Historiographer]] 14:58, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)

Ernestborg9 at 18:24, 20 January 2005

2005-01-20T18:24:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 20 January 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=)		=)

			The interface should give a warning. However, it's not a problem as the original page has been restored.

			Best to double-check before making an entry, using the SEARCH function. I'm hoping a revisied home page that includes leading Categories will soon be up and running which will make searches easier.

Gizmojumpjet at 18:14, 20 January 2005

2005-01-20T18:14:39Z

New page

Sorry about the deletion. Don't know how I could have overlooked the existing article.

I blame the interface.

=)