User talk:1146483070 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:39:02Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 11 April 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Preemptive Block? ==		== Preemptive Block? ==
	I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	:::I adore the phrase "more alphabetically-oriented username." Anyway, you did the right thing, as a purely numeric username (past 2 digits, maybe) is begging for trouble. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:02, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:::I adore the phrase "more alphabetically-oriented username." Anyway, you did the right thing, as a purely numeric username (past 2 digits, maybe) is begging for trouble. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:02, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

CalculatinAvatar: /* Preemptive Block? */

2006-05-01T19:02:45Z

Preemptive Block?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 1 May 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
			:::I adore the phrase "more alphabetically-oriented username." Anyway, you did the right thing, as a purely numeric username (past 2 digits, maybe) is begging for trouble. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:02, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Preemptive Block? */

2006-05-01T17:24:36Z

Preemptive Block?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 1 May 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

			::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Preemptive Block? */ + blocking...

2006-05-01T15:17:17Z

Preemptive Block?: + blocking...

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 1 May 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
			::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: /* Preemptive Block? */

2006-05-01T15:08:53Z

Preemptive Block?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 1 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Preemptive Block? ==		== Preemptive Block? ==
	I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users ~~dont~~ register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: /* Preemptive Block? */

2006-05-01T15:08:11Z

Preemptive Block?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 1 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Preemptive Block? ==		== Preemptive Block? ==
	I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
			:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users dont register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

Steelviper: preemptive vandal block?

2006-05-01T14:47:17Z

preemptive vandal block?

New page

== Welcome to Battlestar Wiki! ==

Welcome to the Wiki, 1146483070. Feel free to tell us about yourself on [[User:1146483070|your user page]]. Before you get started on other edits, please read the [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions]], which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in consistent use of phrasing, abbreviations, format, and the like).

Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on your user talk page, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)! We look forward to your contributions to the community!--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

== Preemptive Block? ==
I'd hate to block somebody before they "did" anything, but having a userid that is a numeric number nearly identical to a handful of other accounts that I have recently blocked is awfully suspicious (especially as it was created at almost the same time as a vandal account). Would a pre-emptive block be advisable in this case, or should we give the benefit of the doubt ("assume good faith") in this case? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:47, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 1 May 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
			:::I adore the phrase "more alphabetically-oriented username." Anyway, you did the right thing, as a purely numeric username (past 2 digits, maybe) is begging for trouble. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 14:02, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 1 May 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		:I share your caution, but I think it's common sense that good-faith users don't register with meaningless decimal strings as their usernames. Since you raised the concern, I'll leave it up to you until he offends. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 10:08, 1 May 2006 (CDT)
	::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)		::If it just impacted me, I think I'd wait until he/she did something (innocent until proven guilty). However, I'm not always around, and I'd hate to see one of you guys have to do the grunt work (quick though it usually is) to pay for my leniency. I'm going to go ahead with the indefinite block. Mr. or Mrs. 1146483070, if you are in fact a good faith user, please feel free to drop me an email and I will promptly unblock you, or perhaps consider creating a more alphabetically-oriented username. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:17, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

			::I concur with you on your move, SV. I reacted immediately to block while simultaneously looking for any spoiled pages, and we do have a history long enough to be understanding in this, as well as having two accounts created at about the same time. This smells strongly of scripting, something making accounts by automation. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:24, 1 May 2006 (CDT)