Template talk:Ships - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: getting rid of red link

2007-10-13T03:59:10Z

getting rid of red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 13 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/~~Archive06~~#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive6#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Physically-seen ships only? */

2007-05-15T15:34:14Z

Physically-seen ships only?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 15 May 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
	:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)		:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
			::I concur with Shane. The categories work fine, and the [[Battlestar]] super-disambig is pretty good (if I do say so myself) for this idea as well. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:34, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Shane: /* Physically-seen ships only? */

2007-05-15T11:11:46Z

Physically-seen ships only?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 15 May 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
	: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
			:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Physically-seen ships only? */ idea

2007-05-14T21:22:00Z

Physically-seen ships only?: idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 14 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
			: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: Physically-seen ships only?

2007-05-14T20:31:51Z

Physically-seen ships only?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 14 May 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

			== Physically-seen ships only? ==

			Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

Shane at 12:02, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T12:02:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 10 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::I think we gotta make an ~~expeption~~ in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Shane at 12:02, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T12:02:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 10 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::I think we gotta make an expeption in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Matthew: comment.

2007-05-10T09:17:54Z

comment.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 10 May 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: need to re-read what I typed before submitting...

2007-05-10T08:37:58Z

need to re-read what I typed before submitting...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 10 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:It's the [[BW:SAC\|standard]] though. I don't think it looks ''that'' bad. Btw, it's not necessary to revert right away in case of such a disagreement. Just bringing up on the talk page first is enough. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:04, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:It's the [[BW:SAC\|standard]] though. I don't think it looks ''that'' bad. Btw, it's not necessary to revert right away in case of such a disagreement. Just bringing up on the talk page first is enough. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:04, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Serenity at 08:37, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T08:37:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 10 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:It's the [[BW:SAC\|standard]] though. I don't think it looks ''that'' bad. Btw, it's not necessary to revert right away in case of such a disagreement. Just bringing up on the talk page first is enough. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:04, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:It's the [[BW:SAC\|standard]] though. I don't think it looks ''that'' bad. Btw, it's not necessary to revert right away in case of such a disagreement. Just bringing up on the talk page first is enough. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:04, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 13 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Its not in the middle of a sentance though it's in its own little sentance between the \| signs. If I were to talk about a <u>b</u>attlestar then fair enough. <u>B</u>attlestar however begins with a capital because it is the starting word. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:21, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/~~Archive06~~#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive6#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 15 May 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
	:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)		:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
			::I concur with Shane. The categories work fine, and the [[Battlestar]] super-disambig is pretty good (if I do say so myself) for this idea as well. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:34, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 15 May 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		Despite the coolness of their recent discovery (a Battlestar Wiki exclusive!), I removed the two new battlestars from the list, as we don't have Solaria, or Triton or Atlantia there either, and it just musses up the template. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
	: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		: Maybe we should make a template for "mentioned-only" ships? Or simply create a list of ships, a la [[List of Vipers]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:22, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
			:: I love template, but that's too much. ;-) If we ''really'' think or more information about the mentioned only stuff comes about then I say template it up. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 06:11, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 10 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::I think we gotta make an ~~expeption~~ in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::I think we gotta make an exception in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 10 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I see that point. This is one of those things were I could go either way. Neither is entirely wrong IMO. It's not really a full sentence though, which is why I prefer lower case personally --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:35, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:I do personally believe that Battlestar is a proper name, I don't consider it on par with something like "destroyer" etc, for multiple reasons. I agree that it looks odd lower-cased as well. Bradley Thompson responded to this question at [[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive06#Battlestar or battlestar? (Basestar or basestar, et cetera)]]. The Wiki's MoS does state not to capitalise ([[BW:SAC#Ships]]). [[User:Matthew\|Matthew]] 04:17, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::I think we gotta make an expeption in this case. Otherwise the works Galactica and Pegusas would be the only clue. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 07:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)