Template talk:Fandom - Revision history

Catrope: /* What's the difference? */ layout fix

2007-08-03T20:09:47Z

What's the difference?: layout fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 3 August 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:On further review: The {{tl\|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl\|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:46, 3 August 2007 (CDT)		:On further review: The {{tl\|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl\|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:46, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

	:The {{tl\|non-canon}} was more or less a precursor to the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template we now use, and as such should probably be deleted. As Spencerian noted, the [{tl\|fandom}} template is used more on [[Frak party]], [[fan fiction]] and other fandom articles we cover. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 14:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT)		:The {{tl\|non-canon}} was more or less a precursor to the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template we now use, and as such should probably be deleted. As Spencerian noted, the {{tl\|fandom}} template is used more on [[Frak party]], [[fan fiction]] and other fandom articles we cover. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 14:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* What's the difference? */ reply

2007-08-03T19:52:15Z

What's the difference?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 3 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:On further review: The {{tl\|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl\|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:46, 3 August 2007 (CDT)		:On further review: The {{tl\|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl\|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:46, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

			:The {{tl\|non-canon}} was more or less a precursor to the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template we now use, and as such should probably be deleted. As Spencerian noted, the [{tl\|fandom}} template is used more on [[Frak party]], [[fan fiction]] and other fandom articles we cover. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 14:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: +comment

2007-08-03T19:46:53Z

+comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 3 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Right now we have {{tl\|fandom}} and {{tl\|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl\|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl\|non-canon}} is used only once. What exactly is the difference between these two templates? If they are the same, one of them should be deleted. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)		Right now we have {{tl\|fandom}} and {{tl\|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl\|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl\|non-canon}} is used only once. What exactly is the difference between these two templates? If they are the same, one of them should be deleted. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)
	:I have one interpretation. "Non-canon" refers to official material that has since been contradicted, like retcons. Fandom is fan-generated content. Since you bring up the question, however, the templates obviously need to be documented. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:54, 4 March 2007 (CST)		:I have one interpretation. "Non-canon" refers to official material that has since been contradicted, like retcons. Fandom is fan-generated content. Since you bring up the question, however, the templates obviously need to be documented. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:54, 4 March 2007 (CST)

			:On further review: The {{tl\|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl\|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl\|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:46, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* What's the difference? */ +comment

2007-03-04T21:54:51Z

What's the difference?: +comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 4 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== What's the difference? ==		== What's the difference? ==
	Right now we have {{tl\|fandom}} and {{tl\|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl\|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl\|non-canon}} is used only once. What exactly is the difference between these two templates? If they are the same, one of them should be deleted. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)		Right now we have {{tl\|fandom}} and {{tl\|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl\|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl\|non-canon}} is used only once. What exactly is the difference between these two templates? If they are the same, one of them should be deleted. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)
			:I have one interpretation. "Non-canon" refers to official material that has since been contradicted, like retcons. Fandom is fan-generated content. Since you bring up the question, however, the templates obviously need to be documented. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:54, 4 March 2007 (CST)

Catrope: New page: == What's the difference? == Right now we have {{tl|fandom}} and {{tl|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl|non-canon}} is used ...

2007-03-04T20:51:30Z

New page: == What's the difference? == Right now we have {{tl|fandom}} and {{tl|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl|non-canon}} is used ...

New page

== What's the difference? ==
Right now we have {{tl|fandom}} and {{tl|non-canon}}, which are used somewhat interchangeably. {{tl|Fandom}} is used 6 times, whereas {{tl|non-canon}} is used only once. What exactly is the difference between these two templates? If they are the same, one of them should be deleted. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)