Template talk:Deletetalk - Revision history

Catrope: Programming lesson #1

2007-03-07T18:09:42Z

Programming lesson #1

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 7 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)		:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
	::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)		::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			:::::Programming lesson #1: keep in mind the average user isn't nearly as smart as you are and doesn't know your program like the back of their pocket (like you do). :P --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:09, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: all of this has happened before, all of this will happen again

2007-03-07T17:23:40Z

all of this has happened before, all of this will happen again

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 7 March 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::''We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".''		::::''We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".''
	:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)		:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Catrope: +reply

2007-03-07T17:18:52Z

+reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 7 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)		:It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)
	::Only if your in agreement with method 1. The whole namespace one even the talk page gets axed. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:45, 7 March 2007 (CST)		::Only if your in agreement with method 1. The whole namespace one even the talk page gets axed. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:45, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			:::This template is intended as some sort of a compromise between methods 1 and 3. The article is deleted, the talkp page is moved to the Deleted Discussion: mainspace (or Deleted talk: if we're gonna have a Deleted: for temporarily undeleted articles) and this tag goes on the original talk page. Wasn't even my idea, but Spencerian's:
			::::''We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".''
			:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Shane at 16:45, 7 March 2007

2007-03-07T16:45:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 7 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)		Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)
	:It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)		:It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			::Only if your in agreement with method 1. The whole namespace one even the talk page gets axed. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:45, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Catrope: Reply

2007-03-07T16:39:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 7 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)		Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			:It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Shane: New page: Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. ~~~~

2007-03-07T16:27:56Z

New page: Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. ~~~~

New page

Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 7 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)		:::--[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
	::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)		::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)
			:::::Programming lesson #1: keep in mind the average user isn't nearly as smart as you are and doesn't know your program like the back of their pocket (like you do). :P --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:09, 7 March 2007 (CST)