Template talk:Archive-item - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:28Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

	Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)		Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 17:13, 20 May 2006

2006-05-20T17:13:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 20 May 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

			Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 05:51, 17 May 2006

2006-05-17T05:51:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 17 May 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
			::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 05:48, 17 May 2006

2006-05-17T05:48:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:48, 17 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
			::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 05:36, 17 May 2006

2006-05-17T05:36:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 17 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:34, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
			:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 05:34, 17 May 2006

2006-05-17T05:34:53Z

New page

Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:34, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

	Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)		Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 20 May 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

			Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 17 May 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
			::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:48, 17 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
	:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)		:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT)
			::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT)