Talk:Unknown craft (RDM comics)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:09Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)		Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)
	: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)		: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)

Serenity: arg wrong namespace

2007-12-14T09:31:58Z

arg wrong namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 14 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)		Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)
	: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)		: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)

	~~== Purpose ==~~

	I can see the point this page in theory, but we need to clearly define how to use this and what to put here. Saying this it is for ship ''types'' and not individual ships is already a step in that direction. For example we already have [[Unnamed battlestars]], so listing them here too would be redundant.

	There are some undefined designs in the civilian Fleet, but note that they already have own pages. [[Five-engined vessel]], [[Wedge-shaped vessel]], [[Tubed vessel]], [[Yellow vessel]] and [[Long-necked vessel]]. Those should be at most ''listed'' here.

	A clear candidate would be the ship above ''Pegasus'' in "Razor", but I already created a section at [[Scorpion Fleet Shipyards]] for this, as that is the likeliest place anyone would look for it. Of course we can detail it here and link from there to here. That depends on how much information there is about it. At the moment it not really enough to need its own article IMO (which would have a completely arbitrary name no one knows). See [[Talk:Fall of the Scorpion Fleet Shipyards#Berzerk Orthos]] for some more information, and a possible sourcing problem.

	To be honest, the main benefit of this would be to have one place that lists all those ships for easy reference. But the information itself is already present elsewhere and doesn't need to be moved here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:26, 14 December 2007 (CST)

Serenity: Purpose

2007-12-14T09:26:51Z

Purpose

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 14 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)		Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)
	: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)		: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)

			== Purpose ==

			I can see the point this page in theory, but we need to clearly define how to use this and what to put here. Saying this it is for ship ''types'' and not individual ships is already a step in that direction. For example we already have [[Unnamed battlestars]], so listing them here too would be redundant.

			There are some undefined designs in the civilian Fleet, but note that they already have own pages. [[Five-engined vessel]], [[Wedge-shaped vessel]], [[Tubed vessel]], [[Yellow vessel]] and [[Long-necked vessel]]. Those should be at most ''listed'' here.

			A clear candidate would be the ship above ''Pegasus'' in "Razor", but I already created a section at [[Scorpion Fleet Shipyards]] for this, as that is the likeliest place anyone would look for it. Of course we can detail it here and link from there to here. That depends on how much information there is about it. At the moment it not really enough to need its own article IMO (which would have a completely arbitrary name no one knows). See [[Talk:Fall of the Scorpion Fleet Shipyards#Berzerk Orthos]] for some more information, and a possible sourcing problem.

			To be honest, the main benefit of this would be to have one place that lists all those ships for easy reference. But the information itself is already present elsewhere and doesn't need to be moved here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 03:26, 14 December 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: reply

2007-12-14T08:01:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 14 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)		Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)
			: Good idea. Done. Although the [[Unknown craft (RDM)]] will be useful for documenting some of the craft of the series which have fleeting screen appearances. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 02:01, 14 December 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Talk:Unknown craft (RDM) moved to Talk:Unknown craft (RDM comics): Peter's suggestion, which is logical

2007-12-14T07:05:59Z

Talk:Unknown craft (RDM) moved to Talk:Unknown craft (RDM comics): Peter's suggestion, which is logical

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:05, 14 December 2007
(No difference)

April Arcus: New page: Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --~~~~

2007-12-14T02:49:18Z

New page: Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --~~~~

New page

Namespace should reflect separate continuity - maybe (RDM comics)? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:49, 13 December 2007 (CST)