Talk:Tylium (RDM)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Joe Beaudoin Jr. moved page Talk:Tylium/Archive 1 to Talk:Tylium (RDM)/Archive 1

2022-08-22T00:58:58Z

Joe Beaudoin Jr. moved page Talk:Tylium/Archive 1 to Talk:Tylium (RDM)/Archive 1

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:58, 22 August 2022
(No difference)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:13Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)		:I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)

	::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)		::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)

	==Move to Tylium (RDM)==		==Move to Tylium (RDM)==
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT)		:No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT)		:Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
	::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT)		::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Natural States */

2007-10-03T19:53:34Z

Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 3 October 2007
Line 44:		Line 44:

	:They don't take fuel from the planet itself. I always assumed that they simply refuel the civilian ships from the refinery ship, tankers and ''Galactica''. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:09, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		:They don't take fuel from the planet itself. I always assumed that they simply refuel the civilian ships from the refinery ship, tankers and ''Galactica''. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:09, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

			::Concur. The Fleet is refueling itself from its own tylium supplies (immediately after the crisis in "Dirty Hands") while orbiting the gas giant. The planet has no solid surface and, therefore, no tylium. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:53, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Natural States */

2007-10-03T16:09:31Z

Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 3 October 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the stuff mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that's already known? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the stuff mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that's already known? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

			:They don't take fuel from the planet itself. I always assumed that they simply refuel the civilian ships from the refinery ship, tankers and ''Galactica''. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:09, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Rapturous: /* Natural States */

2007-10-03T16:05:58Z

Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 3 October 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* Refined Tylium - liquid		* Refined Tylium - liquid

	Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the ~~what the is~~ mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)		Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the stuff mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that's already known? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Rapturous: /* Natural States */

2007-10-03T16:05:14Z

Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 3 October 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* Refined Tylium - liquid		* Refined Tylium - liquid

	Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the what the is mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known?		Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the what the is mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)
	--[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Rapturous: /* Natural States */

2007-10-03T16:04:54Z

Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 3 October 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the what the is mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known?		Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the what the is mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known?
			--[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 11:04, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

Rapturous: New section: Natural States

2007-10-03T16:04:26Z

New section: Natural States

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 3 October 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
	::I've added 'enthalpy' and kept the numbers as is. Also added the footnote.--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 18:48, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		::I've added 'enthalpy' and kept the numbers as is. Also added the footnote.--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 18:48, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

			== Natural States ==

			In [[The Hand of God]] it's clear that tylium ore is solid. However, in [[Maelstrom]] the fleet is refueling from a gas giant.

			* Maelstrom-type Tylium - gas
			* Tylium Ore - solid
			* Tylium Precursor - not known
			* Refined Tylium - liquid

			Does this mean that there is another form of tylium or is the what the is mined in Maelstrom simply another type of one that is already known?

Veepz: /* Destroy all Tylium? */

2007-07-18T23:48:33Z

Destroy all Tylium?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 18 July 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
	:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
			::I've added 'enthalpy' and kept the numbers as is. Also added the footnote.--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 18:48, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Destroy all Tylium? */

2007-07-18T23:19:47Z

Destroy all Tylium?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 18 July 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
			:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)		:I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)

	::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)		::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)

	==Move to Tylium (RDM)==		==Move to Tylium (RDM)==
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT)		:No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT)		:Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
	::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT)		::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 18 July 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		Hm. How about the ''energy density of approximately half a million gigajoules per kilogram''. Can we change that with ''enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo'', so it matches with what Baltar has to say. Enthalpy is the sum of the internal energy of a body and the product of its volume multiplied by the pressure... i.e. energy density--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 17:52, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
	:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)		:The amount of energy is really the same. We don't directly quote it, but it's more common that way. Big SI-suffix, small number. I'd leave it as it is. The other change sounds good. Maybe explain what enthalpy is in a footnote, since not everyone will know it. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
			::I've added 'enthalpy' and kept the numbers as is. Also added the footnote.--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 18:48, 18 July 2007 (CDT)