Talk:Twelve Cylon Models/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:30Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)		My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)

	:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)		:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)

	::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)		::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)

Steelviper: Deleting... any objections?

2006-01-06T15:00:56Z

Deleting... any objections?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 6 January 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	I agree, this page has outlived its purpose. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 23:50, 30 November 2005 (EST)		I agree, this page has outlived its purpose. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 23:50, 30 November 2005 (EST)
			== Countdown to Doomsday ==
			The contents of this article appear to be incorporated here: [[Humano-Cylon]]. It's been over a month, but if nobody objects I'll delete this page (say, next Friday). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:00, 6 January 2006 (EST)

Philwelch: /* Debate Over, It Seems */

2005-12-01T04:50:41Z

Debate Over, It Seems

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 1 December 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::'''EXCELLENT'''. Yes, RDM has finally stated that A) There are 12 copies of Humanoid Cylons (Centurions don't count as a model, nor that silly original theory some had that "maybe 4 or 5 out of the 12 are "Six's" [I know, craziness]). And they aren't based on original people. ---->I would like to point out that I think Ellen Tigh can still be a Cylon: You see, RDM said he thought would be too much ''for one episode'' to say "Ellen Tigh miraculously survived ''and'' she is a Cylon!--->However, I think he just meant it would be too much "all at once"--->she could still be a Cylon, he just wanted to space that out.		:::'''EXCELLENT'''. Yes, RDM has finally stated that A) There are 12 copies of Humanoid Cylons (Centurions don't count as a model, nor that silly original theory some had that "maybe 4 or 5 out of the 12 are "Six's" [I know, craziness]). And they aren't based on original people. ---->I would like to point out that I think Ellen Tigh can still be a Cylon: You see, RDM said he thought would be too much ''for one episode'' to say "Ellen Tigh miraculously survived ''and'' she is a Cylon!--->However, I think he just meant it would be too much "all at once"--->she could still be a Cylon, he just wanted to space that out.
	::::Further concrete evidence to "12 models of Humanoid Cylons": page 20 of "Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion" (Titan Books, 2005), written by David Bassom, states that "there are now 12 models of human-appearing Cylons". Anyone else catch this? Well, it's pretty good and confirmed now. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:49, 11 November 2005 (EST)		::::Further concrete evidence to "12 models of Humanoid Cylons": page 20 of "Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion" (Titan Books, 2005), written by David Bassom, states that "there are now 12 models of human-appearing Cylons". Anyone else catch this? Well, it's pretty good and confirmed now. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:49, 11 November 2005 (EST)

			I agree, this page has outlived its purpose. [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 23:50, 30 November 2005 (EST)

The Merovingian at 19:50, 11 November 2005

2005-11-11T19:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 11 November 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:::'''EXCELLENT'''. Yes, RDM has finally stated that A) There are 12 copies of Humanoid Cylons (Centurions don't count as a model, nor that silly original theory some had that "maybe 4 or 5 out of the 12 are "Six's" [I know, craziness]). And they aren't based on original people. ---->I would like to point out that I think Ellen Tigh can still be a Cylon: You see, RDM said he thought would be too much ''for one episode'' to say "Ellen Tigh miraculously survived ''and'' she is a Cylon!--->However, I think he just meant it would be too much "all at once"--->she could still be a Cylon, he just wanted to space that out.		:::'''EXCELLENT'''. Yes, RDM has finally stated that A) There are 12 copies of Humanoid Cylons (Centurions don't count as a model, nor that silly original theory some had that "maybe 4 or 5 out of the 12 are "Six's" [I know, craziness]). And they aren't based on original people. ---->I would like to point out that I think Ellen Tigh can still be a Cylon: You see, RDM said he thought would be too much ''for one episode'' to say "Ellen Tigh miraculously survived ''and'' she is a Cylon!--->However, I think he just meant it would be too much "all at once"--->she could still be a Cylon, he just wanted to space that out.
			::::Further concrete evidence to "12 models of Humanoid Cylons": page 20 of "Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion" (Titan Books, 2005), written by David Bassom, states that "there are now 12 models of human-appearing Cylons". Anyone else catch this? Well, it's pretty good and confirmed now. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:49, 11 November 2005 (EST)
	Further concrete evidence to "12 models of Humanoid Cylons": page 20 of "Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion" (Titan Books, 2005), written by David Bassom, states that "there are now 12 models of human-appearing Cylons". Anyone else catch this? Well, it's pretty good and confirmed now. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:49, 11 November 2005 (EST)

The Merovingian at 19:49, 11 November 2005

2005-11-11T19:49:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 11 November 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)		::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)


			:::'''EXCELLENT'''. Yes, RDM has finally stated that A) There are 12 copies of Humanoid Cylons (Centurions don't count as a model, nor that silly original theory some had that "maybe 4 or 5 out of the 12 are "Six's" [I know, craziness]). And they aren't based on original people. ---->I would like to point out that I think Ellen Tigh can still be a Cylon: You see, RDM said he thought would be too much ''for one episode'' to say "Ellen Tigh miraculously survived ''and'' she is a Cylon!--->However, I think he just meant it would be too much "all at once"--->she could still be a Cylon, he just wanted to space that out.

			Further concrete evidence to "12 models of Humanoid Cylons": page 20 of "Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion" (Titan Books, 2005), written by David Bassom, states that "there are now 12 models of human-appearing Cylons". Anyone else catch this? Well, it's pretty good and confirmed now. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:49, 11 November 2005 (EST)

Spencerian: /* Debate Over, It Seems */ -Moving answer to H-C page.

2005-11-10T13:40:44Z

Debate Over, It Seems: -Moving answer to H-C page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 10 November 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)		:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)

			::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)

April Arcus: /* Debate Over, It Seems */

2005-11-10T07:45:23Z

Debate Over, It Seems

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 10 November 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)		My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)

	:Thank god. I nominate this page for deletion. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)		:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)

April Arcus at 07:44, 10 November 2005

2005-11-10T07:44:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 10 November 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)		My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)

			:Thank god. I nominate this page for deletion. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)

Spencerian: Debate Over, It Seems

2005-11-09T17:40:41Z

Debate Over, It Seems

New page

== Debate Over, It Seems ==

My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)