Talk:Thomas Zarek/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:29Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 46:		Line 46:

	==Veep?==		==Veep?==
	After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)		::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Thomas Zarek */

2009-02-04T16:34:46Z

Thomas Zarek

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 4 February 2009
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Zarek's full name was stated by Roslin in "Colonial Day". The page should be moved per Leland Adama. I'd move it, but I can't. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 16:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)		Zarek's full name was stated by Roslin in "Colonial Day". The page should be moved per Leland Adama. I'd move it, but I can't. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 16:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
			:Moves were locked down after vandals demonstrated that a LARGE number of moves can be very disruptive. I believe you can get move privileges by getting the "Pilot" user group added to your user. I'm not sure how to do that, but Shane, Joe, or Spencerian should be able to hook you up, I would think. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Steelviper: Talk:Tom Zarek moved to Talk:Thomas Zarek: full name as stated by Roslin during colonial day

2009-02-04T16:27:10Z

Talk:Tom Zarek moved to Talk:Thomas Zarek: full name as stated by Roslin during colonial day

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:27, 4 February 2009
(No difference)

Noneofyourbusiness at 16:20, 4 February 2009

2009-02-04T16:20:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 4 February 2009
Line 58:		Line 58:
	== Meaning of Toms Name ==		== Meaning of Toms Name ==
	The meaning of toms name is "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil. I wonder if this has something to do with clyon god.		The meaning of toms name is "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil. I wonder if this has something to do with clyon god.

			== Thomas Zarek ==

			Zarek's full name was stated by Roslin in "Colonial Day". The page should be moved per Leland Adama. I'd move it, but I can't. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 16:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Mafiageek at 20:43, 3 February 2009

2009-02-03T20:43:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 3 February 2009
Line 56:		Line 56:
	Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)		Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

	== Meaning of Name ==		== Meaning of Toms Name ==
	The meaning of toms name ~~to mean this~~ "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil.		The meaning of toms name is "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil. I wonder if this has something to do with clyon god.

Mafiageek at 20:28, 3 February 2009

2009-02-03T20:28:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 3 February 2009
Line 55:		Line 55:

	Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)		Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Meaning of Name ==
			The meaning of toms name to mean this "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil.

Space Lizard: /* Locked */ new section

2009-01-24T17:09:46Z

Locked: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 24 January 2009
Line 51:		Line 51:
	:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)		::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)

			== Locked ==

			Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

BklynBruzer: /* Veep? */

2007-02-06T12:23:29Z

Veep?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 6 February 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
			::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Comic series */ reply

2007-02-06T01:11:09Z

Comic series: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 6 February 2007
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::I agree. Judgeing from the first issue, and the fact that the narrator is Zarek himself, there is no diverge from contunity of the current series. Is sits rather firmly in the framwork of what we all ready know about the character. While I wouldn't go changeing things in either article until the comic is complete, I wouldn't jump to conclusions either.--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:59, 5 February 2007 (CST)		::I agree. Judgeing from the first issue, and the fact that the narrator is Zarek himself, there is no diverge from contunity of the current series. Is sits rather firmly in the framwork of what we all ready know about the character. While I wouldn't go changeing things in either article until the comic is complete, I wouldn't jump to conclusions either.--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:59, 5 February 2007 (CST)

			::: Regardless of how close to the framework the comics sit, unless otherwise stated by RDM or The Powers that Be, the series [[canon]] consists of what's been aired, as well as comments made in the podcasts. Thus making the comics non-canon. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:11, 5 February 2007 (CST)

	== Zarek in Exodus ==		== Zarek in Exodus ==

Deepbluesky at 00:59, 6 February 2007

2007-02-06T00:59:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 6 February 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:Non-canonical, but looks to be better drawn and written than the current ones. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:09, 27 August 2006 (CDT)		:Non-canonical, but looks to be better drawn and written than the current ones. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:09, 27 August 2006 (CDT)
	:Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT)		:Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT)

			::I agree. Judgeing from the first issue, and the fact that the narrator is Zarek himself, there is no diverge from contunity of the current series. Is sits rather firmly in the framwork of what we all ready know about the character. While I wouldn't go changeing things in either article until the comic is complete, I wouldn't jump to conclusions either.--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:59, 5 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 46:		Line 46:

	==Veep?==		==Veep?==
	After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)		::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 6 February 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)		:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
			::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 6 February 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:Non-canonical, but looks to be better drawn and written than the current ones. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:09, 27 August 2006 (CDT)		:Non-canonical, but looks to be better drawn and written than the current ones. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:09, 27 August 2006 (CDT)
	:Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT)		:Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT)

			::I agree. Judgeing from the first issue, and the fact that the narrator is Zarek himself, there is no diverge from contunity of the current series. Is sits rather firmly in the framwork of what we all ready know about the character. While I wouldn't go changeing things in either article until the comic is complete, I wouldn't jump to conclusions either.--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:59, 5 February 2007 (CST)