Talk:The Last Supper/Archive 1 - Revision history

23skidoo: 11th Hour reference

2009-02-17T04:23:30Z

11th Hour reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 17 February 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	--[[User:Unfalln\|Unfalln]] 05:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:Unfalln\|Unfalln]] 05:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

			==An 11th-hour reference==
			Tigh is looking directly at the empty space at the table. I'm trying to figure out how to word the implications of this so it doesn't end up being a glaring spoiler, owing to revelations in recent episodes. If anyone wants to give it a shot, be my guest. [[User:23skidoo\|23skidoo]] 04:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Unfalln: /* Compared to real last supper */ new section

2008-06-01T05:40:06Z

Compared to real last supper: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:40, 1 June 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Changing? ==		== Changing? ==
	Some are reporting the the photo is changing. The latest [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/home.html version] has what Roslin is burning is no missing from the photo. Personally, I think the whole thing is an "ink blot test" cooked up to mess with us diehards. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 15:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)		Some are reporting the the photo is changing. The latest [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/home.html version] has what Roslin is burning is no missing from the photo. Personally, I think the whole thing is an "ink blot test" cooked up to mess with us diehards. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 15:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Compared to real last supper ==

			I was fiddling around with this image this morning, and I noticed that the characters in this and the original last supper line up much more closely when one of the images are flipped. This seemed particularly true when Starbuck lines up with the "swooning" john/magdalene, and Natalie's outstretched arm mimics Matthew's :)

			Looking at it now I guess it's obvious, but with no text in the article about this being the case, I thought I'd mention it here.

			--[[User:Unfalln\|Unfalln]] 05:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Gougef: /* Changing? */

2008-05-16T15:19:20Z

Changing?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 16 May 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Changing? ==		== Changing? ==
			Some are reporting the the photo is changing. The latest [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/home.html version] has what Roslin is burning is no missing from the photo. Personally, I think the whole thing is an "ink blot test" cooked up to mess with us diehards. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 15:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Gougef: temp save

2008-05-16T15:04:01Z

temp save

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 16 May 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	A section should be added regarding the Last Supper being used for BSG spots on the Sci Fi Channel as commercials. I know there is at least one version of the spot, where the narrator talks about Athena and Agatheon, and 6. Are there any other variations? [[User:Zidel333\|Zidel333]] 01:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)		A section should be added regarding the Last Supper being used for BSG spots on the Sci Fi Channel as commercials. I know there is at least one version of the spot, where the narrator talks about Athena and Agatheon, and 6. Are there any other variations? [[User:Zidel333\|Zidel333]] 01:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
	: Welcome to the wiki Zidel! :D Anyway, there are a few variations of the commercial... you can probably get them through [http://galacticasitrep.blogspot.com Galactica SitRep]. Also, these commercials should probably be noted here under the appropriate section. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 01:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)		: Welcome to the wiki Zidel! :D Anyway, there are a few variations of the commercial... you can probably get them through [http://galacticasitrep.blogspot.com Galactica SitRep]. Also, these commercials should probably be noted here under the appropriate section. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 01:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

			== Changing? ==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Last Supper Used in Sci Fi Channel commercials */ reply

2008-04-19T01:45:15Z

Last Supper Used in Sci Fi Channel commercials: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 19 April 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	A section should be added regarding the Last Supper being used for BSG spots on the Sci Fi Channel as commercials. I know there is at least one version of the spot, where the narrator talks about Athena and Agatheon, and 6. Are there any other variations? [[User:Zidel333\|Zidel333]] 01:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)		A section should be added regarding the Last Supper being used for BSG spots on the Sci Fi Channel as commercials. I know there is at least one version of the spot, where the narrator talks about Athena and Agatheon, and 6. Are there any other variations? [[User:Zidel333\|Zidel333]] 01:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
			: Welcome to the wiki Zidel! :D Anyway, there are a few variations of the commercial... you can probably get them through [http://galacticasitrep.blogspot.com Galactica SitRep]. Also, these commercials should probably be noted here under the appropriate section. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 01:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Zidel333: /* Last Supper Used in Sci Fi Channel commercials */ new section

2008-04-19T01:16:33Z

Last Supper Used in Sci Fi Channel commercials: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 19 April 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)		::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)
	:::Moore's just using the photo to take the opportunity to mindfrak us... Douglas basically said that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:28, 10 February 2008 (CST)		:::Moore's just using the photo to take the opportunity to mindfrak us... Douglas basically said that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:28, 10 February 2008 (CST)

			== Last Supper Used in Sci Fi Channel commercials ==

			A section should be added regarding the Last Supper being used for BSG spots on the Sci Fi Channel as commercials. I know there is at least one version of the spot, where the narrator talks about Athena and Agatheon, and 6. Are there any other variations? [[User:Zidel333\|Zidel333]] 01:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: reply

2008-02-11T01:28:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 11 February 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)		:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)
	::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)		::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)
			:::Moore's just using the photo to take the opportunity to mindfrak us... Douglas basically said that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:28, 10 February 2008 (CST)

Mars at 01:09, 11 February 2008

2008-02-11T01:09:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 11 February 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)		::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)
	:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)		:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)
			::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)

Serenity at 19:58, 27 January 2008

2008-01-27T19:58:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 27 January 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)		:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)
	::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)		::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)
			:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)

Spencerian at 19:45, 27 January 2008

2008-01-27T19:45:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 27 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aaron Douglas' comments about this photo need to be included as well... They can be located via the LJ. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:33, 25 January 2008 (CST)		Aaron Douglas' comments about this photo need to be included as well... They can be located via the LJ. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:33, 25 January 2008 (CST)
	:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)		:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)
			::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 11 February 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)		:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)
	::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)		::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)
			:::Moore's just using the photo to take the opportunity to mindfrak us... Douglas basically said that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:28, 10 February 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 11 February 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)		::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)
	:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)		:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)
			::The thing I don't get about Douglas's shoot-down take on the intrepretations of the photo is that, as this article makes explicit, Moore provided a commentary notes that seems to match with the way the actors are proped and posed, so it's kind of confusing to say that nothing in the image means anything... or is it just me in my normal spirit of confusion? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 19:09, 10 February 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 27 January 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)		:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)
	::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)		::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)
			:::Yeah, it's a great shot from a stylistic and artistic point of view. But the ridiculous amounts of speculation this has caused wants me to bash my head against the wall. Some people really thought that everything in it has a secret meaning. I'm glad that Douglas stepped up and shot that down. The over-analyzing really detracts from its other merits. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:58, 27 January 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 27 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aaron Douglas' comments about this photo need to be included as well... They can be located via the LJ. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:33, 25 January 2008 (CST)		Aaron Douglas' comments about this photo need to be included as well... They can be located via the LJ. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:33, 25 January 2008 (CST)
	:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)		:Done. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 18:49, 25 January 2008 (CST)
			::That's a fun photo. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:45, 27 January 2008 (CST)