Talk:The Imperfections of Memory/Archive 1 - Revision history

Cheka73: /* Amanda Seeing Clarice's face? */

2010-03-18T15:39:03Z

Amanda Seeing Clarice's face?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 18 March 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:You are correct. I wondered what the article was talking about, but supposed I could have missed a line of dialogue. If it is talking about Amanda referring to the look on Clarice's face, then someone had a misunderstanding. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)		:You are correct. I wondered what the article was talking about, but supposed I could have missed a line of dialogue. If it is talking about Amanda referring to the look on Clarice's face, then someone had a misunderstanding. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

			::Oh dear. I apologise, I wrote that. I misheard the line :( Thanks for spotting the mistake, I'd never have realised it myself! [[User:Cheka73\|Cheka73]] 15:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 13:41, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T13:41:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 17 March 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Sharr		Sharr

	:You are correct. I wondered what the article was talking about, but supposed I could have missed a line of dialogue. If it is talking about Amanda referring to the look on Clarice's face, then someone ~~misunderstood something~~. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)		:You are correct. I wondered what the article was talking about, but supposed I could have missed a line of dialogue. If it is talking about Amanda referring to the look on Clarice's face, then someone had a misunderstanding. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 13:39, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T13:39:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 17 March 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Sharr		Sharr

			:You are correct. I wondered what the article was talking about, but supposed I could have missed a line of dialogue. If it is talking about Amanda referring to the look on Clarice's face, then someone misunderstood something. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Sharr: /* Amanda Seeing Clarice's face? */

2010-03-17T02:38:29Z

Amanda Seeing Clarice's face?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 17 March 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I think the article for The Imperfections of Memory is in error. Amanda seemed to me to be remarking on Clarice's reaction to learning she was in a mental hospital, not that she saw Clarice while "chasing her brother down imaginary and real halls".		I think the article for The Imperfections of Memory is in error. Amanda seemed to me to be remarking on Clarice's reaction to learning she was in a mental hospital, not that she saw Clarice while "chasing her brother down imaginary and real halls".

			Sharr

Sharr: /* Amanda Seeing Clarice's face? */ new section

2010-03-17T02:37:43Z

Amanda Seeing Clarice's face?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 17 March 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:: [[User:Walabio\|— “⸘Ŭalabio‽”]] 01:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)		:: [[User:Walabio\|— “⸘Ŭalabio‽”]] 01:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Amanda Seeing Clarice's face? ==

			I think the article for The Imperfections of Memory is in error. Amanda seemed to me to be remarking on Clarice's reaction to learning she was in a mental hospital, not that she saw Clarice while "chasing her brother down imaginary and real halls".

Walabio: The atmospheric Vipers might be the equivalent of MK # 0.

2010-03-16T01:46:15Z

The atmospheric Vipers might be the equivalent of MK # 0.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 16 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Vipers==		==Vipers==
	Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)		Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

	:I've come to think that the TOS Viper's from the BSG miniseries (even if just a Easter egg/homage) have always been considered as the "Mk.I", possibly used before the introduction of the Mk.II's later in the First Cylon War. I saw "CAF" markings on this aircraft at a quick glance, possibly meaning "Caprican Air Force", which could denote it's inclusion as an atmospheric fighter only. In my opinion, this Viper only relates to the Colonial Fleet Viper in name only, with the later being named after the former. [[User:CommanderTony\|CommanderTony]] 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)		:I've come to think that the TOS Viper's from the BSG miniseries (even if just a Easter egg/homage) have always been considered as the "Mk.I", possibly used before the introduction of the Mk.II's later in the First Cylon War. I saw "CAF" markings on this aircraft at a quick glance, possibly meaning "Caprican Air Force", which could denote it's inclusion as an atmospheric fighter only. In my opinion, this Viper only relates to the Colonial Fleet Viper in name only, with the later being named after the former. [[User:CommanderTony\|CommanderTony]] 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

			:: In a sense, these atmospheric Vipers might be MK # 0. The original Cylon-Raiders seem to be a redesign of auxiliary craft like Raptors. I would not be surprised if we see Battlestars like in the original series in Caprica and the precursors of Basestars being civilian cargo-vessles redesigned into military-vessels because is is easy to pack cylons like sardines in cargo-vessels. In other words, the precursors of most vessels in the Battelstar Galactica (RDM) probably already exist in Caprica. Understandably, all of this is speculation and should be taken with a grain of salt.

			:: [[User:Walabio\|— “⸘Ŭalabio‽”]] 01:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

CommanderTony: /* Vipers */

2010-03-14T05:46:48Z

Vipers

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 14 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Vipers==		==Vipers==
	Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)		Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
	:I've come to think that the TOS Viper's from the BSG miniseries have always been considered as the "Mk.I", possibly used before the introduction of the Mk.II's later in the First Cylon War. I saw "CAF" markings on this aircraft at a quick glance, possibly meaning "Caprican Air Force", which could denote it's inclusion as an atmospheric fighter only. In my opinion, this Viper only relates to the Colonial Fleet Viper in name only, with the later being named after the former. [[User:CommanderTony\|CommanderTony]] 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)		:I've come to think that the TOS Viper's from the BSG miniseries (even if just a Easter egg/homage) have always been considered as the "Mk.I", possibly used before the introduction of the Mk.II's later in the First Cylon War. I saw "CAF" markings on this aircraft at a quick glance, possibly meaning "Caprican Air Force", which could denote it's inclusion as an atmospheric fighter only. In my opinion, this Viper only relates to the Colonial Fleet Viper in name only, with the later being named after the former. [[User:CommanderTony\|CommanderTony]] 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

CommanderTony: /* Vipers */

2010-03-14T05:42:57Z

Vipers

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 14 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Vipers==		==Vipers==
	Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)		Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
			:I've come to think that the TOS Viper's from the BSG miniseries have always been considered as the "Mk.I", possibly used before the introduction of the Mk.II's later in the First Cylon War. I saw "CAF" markings on this aircraft at a quick glance, possibly meaning "Caprican Air Force", which could denote it's inclusion as an atmospheric fighter only. In my opinion, this Viper only relates to the Colonial Fleet Viper in name only, with the later being named after the former. [[User:CommanderTony\|CommanderTony]] 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Ausir at 21:34, 13 March 2010

2010-03-13T21:34:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 13 March 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Why can't Heracles/Tad guide Joseph Adama through V-world, leaving him instead to wander around ? Give him a map, Tamara-A's previous locations, anything. {{unsigned\|Dante2428}}		Why can't Heracles/Tad guide Joseph Adama through V-world, leaving him instead to wander around ? Give him a map, Tamara-A's previous locations, anything. {{unsigned\|Dante2428}}

			==Vipers==
			Is it reasonable to assume that the Viper shown in this episode is a Mark I? [[User:Ausir\|Ausir]] 21:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Tad support */ + unsigned

2010-03-13T13:20:01Z

Tad support: + unsigned

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:20, 13 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Tad support ==		== Tad support ==

	Why can't Heracles/Tad guide Joseph Adama through V-world, leaving him instead to wander around ? Give him a map, Tamara-A's previous locations, anything.		Why can't Heracles/Tad guide Joseph Adama through V-world, leaving him instead to wander around ? Give him a map, Tamara-A's previous locations, anything. {{unsigned\|Dante2428}}