Talk:The Destiny/Archive 1 - Revision history

Noneofyourbusiness at 23:52, 1 March 2010

2010-03-01T23:52:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 1 March 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	You're right, and I'm shocked no one's changed this (until now). {{unsigned\|Meezhammer}}		You're right, and I'm shocked no one's changed this (until now). {{unsigned\|Meezhammer}}

			:I would have if I had noticed. The Earth people in Daybreak were clearly physically modern humans. I'm reminded of the TV Tropes page You Fail Biology Forever. Thank you for fixing it, Meezhammer. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Human Evolution period */

2010-03-01T16:43:37Z

Human Evolution period

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 1 March 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	== Human Evolution period ==		== Human Evolution period ==

	At the end of the article, it is mentioned that they live with australopithecine natives, wouldn't they have met up with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_Homo_sapiens Archaic Homo Sapiens] or even [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu Homo Sapiens Idaltu]? I say this because in the australopithecine article, they existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, whereas the Archaic Homo Sapiens is more ~150,000 years ago.		At the end of the article, it is mentioned that they live with australopithecine natives, wouldn't they have met up with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_Homo_sapiens Archaic Homo Sapiens] or even [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu Homo Sapiens Idaltu]? I say this because in the australopithecine article, they existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, whereas the Archaic Homo Sapiens is more ~150,000 years ago. {{unsigned\|Devoras}}

	You're right, and I'm shocked no one's changed this (until now).		You're right, and I'm shocked no one's changed this (until now). {{unsigned\|Meezhammer}}

Meezhammer at 03:42, 1 March 2010

2010-03-01T03:42:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:42, 1 March 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	At the end of the article, it is mentioned that they live with australopithecine natives, wouldn't they have met up with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_Homo_sapiens Archaic Homo Sapiens] or even [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu Homo Sapiens Idaltu]? I say this because in the australopithecine article, they existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, whereas the Archaic Homo Sapiens is more ~150,000 years ago.		At the end of the article, it is mentioned that they live with australopithecine natives, wouldn't they have met up with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_Homo_sapiens Archaic Homo Sapiens] or even [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu Homo Sapiens Idaltu]? I say this because in the australopithecine article, they existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, whereas the Archaic Homo Sapiens is more ~150,000 years ago.

			You're right, and I'm shocked no one's changed this (until now).

Devoras: /* Human Evolution period */ new section

2009-03-26T13:47:46Z

Human Evolution period: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 26 March 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	How was she the harbinger of death, exactly? If there's any explanation, this needs to be added.--[[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 18:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)		How was she the harbinger of death, exactly? If there's any explanation, this needs to be added.--[[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 18:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

			== Human Evolution period ==

			At the end of the article, it is mentioned that they live with australopithecine natives, wouldn't they have met up with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_Homo_sapiens Archaic Homo Sapiens] or even [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu Homo Sapiens Idaltu]? I say this because in the australopithecine article, they existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago, whereas the Archaic Homo Sapiens is more ~150,000 years ago.

Space Lizard: /* "Harbinger of Death" */ new section

2009-03-22T18:54:51Z

"Harbinger of Death": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 22 March 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Roslin is clearly the most likely candidate, however I think that Thrace has enough supporting evidence to warrent a mention. She played a major role in guiding the fleet to Earth, she may have died in Maelstrom, and as CAG, she was a leader. The main problem is that She doesn't have a literal wasting disease, however her obsessive and self-destructive tendancies are arguably a metaphorical wasting disease. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)		Roslin is clearly the most likely candidate, however I think that Thrace has enough supporting evidence to warrent a mention. She played a major role in guiding the fleet to Earth, she may have died in Maelstrom, and as CAG, she was a leader. The main problem is that She doesn't have a literal wasting disease, however her obsessive and self-destructive tendancies are arguably a metaphorical wasting disease. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
	:A interesting thought. Also, if Roslin is still the dying leader <i>(waves hand in Jedi mind trick)</i>, this may not be the Earth they're looking for. I'm still betting on Roslin, given what was seen. But, yes, "leader" is quite vague. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)		:A interesting thought. Also, if Roslin is still the dying leader <i>(waves hand in Jedi mind trick)</i>, this may not be the Earth they're looking for. I'm still betting on Roslin, given what was seen. But, yes, "leader" is quite vague. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

			== "Harbinger of Death" ==

			How was she the harbinger of death, exactly? If there's any explanation, this needs to be added.--[[User:Space Lizard\|Space Lizard]] 18:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Spencerian: /* The dying leader */

2008-07-31T16:44:00Z

The dying leader

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 31 July 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== The dying leader ==		== The dying leader ==
	Roslin is clearly the most likely candidate, however I think that Thrace has enough supporting evidence to warrent a mention. She played a major role in guiding the fleet to Earth, she may have died in Maelstrom, and as CAG, she was a leader. The main problem is that She doesn't have a literal wasting disease, however her obsessive and self-destructive tendancies are arguably a metaphorical wasting disease. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)		Roslin is clearly the most likely candidate, however I think that Thrace has enough supporting evidence to warrent a mention. She played a major role in guiding the fleet to Earth, she may have died in Maelstrom, and as CAG, she was a leader. The main problem is that She doesn't have a literal wasting disease, however her obsessive and self-destructive tendancies are arguably a metaphorical wasting disease. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
			:A interesting thought. Also, if Roslin is still the dying leader <i>(waves hand in Jedi mind trick)</i>, this may not be the Earth they're looking for. I'm still betting on Roslin, given what was seen. But, yes, "leader" is quite vague. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 16:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Gordon Ecker: the dying leader

2008-07-25T22:55:02Z

the dying leader

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 25 July 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:  All will be revealed. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)		:  All will be revealed. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

			== The dying leader ==
			Roslin is clearly the most likely candidate, however I think that Thrace has enough supporting evidence to warrent a mention. She played a major role in guiding the fleet to Earth, she may have died in Maelstrom, and as CAG, she was a leader. The main problem is that She doesn't have a literal wasting disease, however her obsessive and self-destructive tendancies are arguably a metaphorical wasting disease. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: reply

2008-05-26T20:09:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 26 May 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a		were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a
	different version of Starbuck.		different version of Starbuck.


	There is a discrepency in the prophesies of the two hybrids (in "Razor" and in "Faith").  The First Hybrid says she will lead "the human race" to its end.  The hybrid in Faith says she will lead "them all to their end."  What does the discrepency mean?  I'm not sure, but I'm convinced it means something.  -- [[User:Monupics\|Monupics]] 20:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)<br>		There is a discrepency in the prophesies of the two hybrids (in "Razor" and in "Faith").  The First Hybrid says she will lead "the human race" to its end.  The hybrid in Faith says she will lead "them all to their end."  What does the discrepency mean?  I'm not sure, but I'm convinced it means something.  -- [[User:Monupics\|Monupics]] 20:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

			:  All will be revealed. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Monupics at 20:02, 26 May 2008

2008-05-26T20:02:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 26 May 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a		were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a
	different version of Starbuck.		different version of Starbuck.






	There is a discrepency in the prophesies of the two hybrids (in "Razor" and in "Faith").  The First Hybrid says she will lead "the human race" to its end.  The hybrid in Faith says she will lead "them all to their end."  What does the discrepency mean?  I'm not sure, but I'm convinced it means something.  -- [[User:Monupics\|Monupics]] 20:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)<br>		There is a discrepency in the prophesies of the two hybrids (in "Razor" and in "Faith").  The First Hybrid says she will lead "the human race" to its end.  The hybrid in Faith says she will lead "them all to their end."  What does the discrepency mean?  I'm not sure, but I'm convinced it means something.  -- [[User:Monupics\|Monupics]] 20:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)<br>

Monupics: Slight misquote on page.

2008-05-26T20:01:30Z

Slight misquote on page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 26 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In which podcast did RDM state that Kara is not a Cylon? I don't remember any explicit statements in the [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|Crossroads, Part II podcast]]. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT)		In which podcast did RDM state that Kara is not a Cylon? I don't remember any explicit statements in the [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II\|Crossroads, Part II podcast]]. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
	:You're right. I'll remove the note, but I'm sure I heard it somewhere, dang it. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 00:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
			:You're right. I'll remove the note, but I'm sure I heard it somewhere, dang it. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 00:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
	:David Eick did say in the [http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-starbuck4apr04,1,334914.story LA Times]:--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 14:28, 21 April 2007 (CDT)		:David Eick did say in the [http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-starbuck4apr04,1,334914.story LA Times]:--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 14:28, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

	"My goal was to mislead the audience into thinking Kara Thrace was a		"My goal was to mislead the audience into thinking Kara Thrace was a
	Cylon," Eick said. Being a Cylon, after all, would mean that there		Cylon," Eick said. Being a Cylon, after all, would mean that there
	were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a		were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a
	different version of Starbuck.		different version of Starbuck.






			There is a discrepency in the prophesies of the two hybrids (in "Razor" and in "Faith").  The First Hybrid says she will lead "the human race" to its end.  The hybrid in Faith says she will lead "them all to their end."  What does the discrepency mean?  I'm not sure, but I'm convinced it means something.  -- [[User:Monupics\|Monupics]] 20:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)<br>