Talk:The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:20Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

Catrope: /* Edit war */ sounds good

2007-05-10T19:02:18Z

Edit war: sounds good

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 10 May 2007
Line 89:		Line 89:
	:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			:::::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Edit war */

2007-05-10T16:46:11Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 10 May 2007
Line 88:		Line 88:
	::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* Edit war */ cylon sex disproportionate

2007-05-10T16:37:31Z

Edit war: cylon sex disproportionate

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 10 May 2007
Line 87:		Line 87:

	::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian at 16:26, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T16:26:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 10 May 2007
Line 85:		Line 85:
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	~~:::~~::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Edit war */ +comment

2007-05-10T16:25:56Z

Edit war: +comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 10 May 2007
Line 85:		Line 85:
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
			:::::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* Edit war */ unsigned comment

2007-05-10T15:54:31Z

Edit war: unsigned comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 10 May 2007
Line 83:		Line 83:
	:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	::::Right, but to be honest, I don't see the funny. Some males have sex with Cylons. So what? So do some of the females, like Ellen Tigh, Starbuck (Anders and imaginary Leoben), or Boomer (even if she's a Cylon herself). Why is that not funny? Also, with Thorne there is still a rape reference in it, but at least that happens on screen, making it more useful for a drinking game.		::::Right, but to be honest, I don't see the funny. Some males have sex with Cylons. So what? So do some of the females, like Ellen Tigh, Starbuck (Anders and imaginary Leoben), or Boomer (even if she's a Cylon herself). Why is that not funny? Also, with Thorne there is still a rape reference in it, but at least that happens on screen, making it more useful for a drinking game.
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Edit war */

2007-05-10T15:45:31Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 10 May 2007
Line 82:		Line 82:
	::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	::::Right, but to be honest, I don't see the funny. Some males have sex with Cylons. So what? So do some of the females, like Ellen Tigh, Starbuck (Anders and imaginary Leoben), or Boomer (even if she's a Cylon herself). Why is that not funny? Also, with Thorne there is still a rape reference in it, but at least that happens on screen.		::::Right, but to be honest, I don't see the funny. Some males have sex with Cylons. So what? So do some of the females, like Ellen Tigh, Starbuck (Anders and imaginary Leoben), or Boomer (even if she's a Cylon herself). Why is that not funny? Also, with Thorne there is still a rape reference in it, but at least that happens on screen, making it more useful for a drinking game.
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Edit war */

2007-05-10T15:42:05Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 10 May 2007
Line 82:		Line 82:
	::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
			::::Right, but to be honest, I don't see the funny. Some males have sex with Cylons. So what? So do some of the females, like Ellen Tigh, Starbuck (Anders and imaginary Leoben), or Boomer (even if she's a Cylon herself). Why is that not funny? Also, with Thorne there is still a rape reference in it, but at least that happens on screen.
			::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

BklynBruzer: /* Edit war */

2007-05-09T23:12:09Z

Edit war

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 9 May 2007
Line 82:		Line 82:
	::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		::Concur with Joe, its not something to be made fun of. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:06, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree that it's kind of disgusting to joke about the gang rape thing, but that doesn't justify removing an entire section, like I explained in my edit summary. The remover should just have removed the gang rape bullet point, and leave the rest intact. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
			:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 10 May 2007
Line 89:		Line 89:
	:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			:::::Sounds good to me. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:02, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 10 May 2007
Line 88:		Line 88:
	::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::I agree. It is a fact, though, that Cylons have been involved in more than half of the sex shown on the show. Maybe there is a way to write this paragraph less offensively? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 11:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::::Maybe turn it around? Instead of humans having sex with Cylons, making it "A Cylon has sex with someone"? That can then include both genders. From a repetition standpoint that might also be more noteworthy. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:46, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 10 May 2007
Line 85:		Line 85:
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
	~~:::~~::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
			::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 10 May 2007
Line 85:		Line 85:
	::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}		::::Trick question: what about Anders and Foster? hehe {{unsigned\|Serenity}}
	:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)		:As for the edit war bit, I feel no ownership. The reason I put the gang rape reference back in is that I thought it was kind of funny, and I felt that the other guy (DrBat, I think it was) was exhibiting ownership. If the consensus is to keep it out, then it's out and I won't put it back. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 18:12, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
			:::::Silly pages normally have a hidden message that outlines something. In this article's case, it's repetition of particular plot devices or situations that may become stale (CIC bursting into applause is a good one, or Helo's stubborness). Nothing on an article should reach a level of distaste, however, and I've never found that particular section (which involves several men in ''one collective incident'') useful, as gang rape in the show has not been implied or repeated other than that instance. For that reason, the section should not be added again. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 11:25, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I see no valid reason to delete this page. — [[User:Lestatdelc\|Lestatdelc]] 21:21, 4 December 2005 (EST)		I see no valid reason to delete this page. — [[User:Lestatdelc\|Lestatdelc]] 21:21, 4 December 2005 (EST)

	Have a little fun, Ricimer. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 23:58, 4 December 2005 (EST)		Have a little fun, Ricimer. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 23:58, 4 December 2005 (EST)

	Yeah, man. I quite enjoyed the examples of Helo being an idiot. The only beef I'd give any creedence to would be if someone else had an equally valid, but mutually exclusive Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game, then I'd say we should call this one "'''A''' Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game" or just make a page called "Battlestar Galactica Drinking Games". However, that's not a concern, yet, is it? And it's not as if the only purpose of this list of things is to promote alcoholism or drunkeness... This is a tongue-in-cheek way of noting the over-used elements in ''Battlestar''. It might even be considered, gasp, thoughtful. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 00:17, 5 December 2005 (EST)		Yeah, man. I quite enjoyed the examples of Helo being an idiot. The only beef I'd give any creedence to would be if someone else had an equally valid, but mutually exclusive Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game, then I'd say we should call this one "'''A''' Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game" or just make a page called "Battlestar Galactica Drinking Games". However, that's not a concern, yet, is it? And it's not as if the only purpose of this list of things is to promote alcoholism or drunkeness... This is a tongue-in-cheek way of noting the over-used elements in ''Battlestar''. It might even be considered, gasp, thoughtful. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 00:17, 5 December 2005 (EST)
Line 10:		Line 10:
	: <s>I need to think about it before making a definite decision...</s> I thought about it and the page, despite its present humor, is actually a valid article on recurring plot points and issues in BSG. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 11:28, 5 December 2005 (EST)		: <s>I need to think about it before making a definite decision...</s> I thought about it and the page, despite its present humor, is actually a valid article on recurring plot points and issues in BSG. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 11:28, 5 December 2005 (EST)

	::To comment more seriously: I enjoy the fact that we don't have to be deathly serious here all the time, and have a few places to blow off a little steam. These areas are all well-segregated from the main content of the wikI. I'm sorry that the very existence of these pages seems to trouble Ricimer so deeply, but I must point out that users who do not find them amusing are entirely free to ignore them. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 03:04, 5 December 2005 (EST)		::To comment more seriously: I enjoy the fact that we don't have to be deathly serious here all the time, and have a few places to blow off a little steam. These areas are all well-segregated from the main content of the wikI. I'm sorry that the very existence of these pages seems to trouble Ricimer so deeply, but I must point out that users who do not find them amusing are entirely free to ignore them. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 03:04, 5 December 2005 (EST)

	::While some of the items are a tad off-color, they aren't vile or patently offensive. (If the subject matter was truly offensive, it would not have even ''aired''). We can still use a little levity, so long as its properly segregated in the Silly Pages category. I would like the "source" of this game, however, even if its just an internet link. I, for one, think its suitably funny. I second Peter on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:49, 5 December 2005 (EST)		::While some of the items are a tad off-color, they aren't vile or patently offensive. (If the subject matter was truly offensive, it would not have even ''aired''). We can still use a little levity, so long as its properly segregated in the Silly Pages category. I would like the "source" of this game, however, even if its just an internet link. I, for one, think its suitably funny. I second Peter on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:49, 5 December 2005 (EST)
	:::I think it's suitably funny as a piece of trivia arrising out of the BSG fandom. Perhaps we could start a section on non-canonical trivia, in order to keep things in their right place. I know there are the "silly" pages but the drinking game is something created by fans outside of the wiki, not unlike fanfiction and 3D meshes. --[[User:MASON\|Mason]] 09:58, 5 December 2005 (EST)		:::I think it's suitably funny as a piece of trivia arrising out of the BSG fandom. Perhaps we could start a section on non-canonical trivia, in order to keep things in their right place. I know there are the "silly" pages but the drinking game is something created by fans outside of the wiki, not unlike fanfiction and 3D meshes. --[[User:MASON\|Mason]] 09:58, 5 December 2005 (EST)
	::::I just reread it again and tears came from my eyes when I hit the Helo stuff. ("Territory issues..." HAH!) It's not just the old "Hi, Bob" drinking game of The Bob Newhart Show working here; Mason hit it on the nose that this does point out what few elemental contrivances in the show are getting a bit overused. This is a good place for us to point these out, as I just did. If nothing else, we can rename this to "Overused Character and Plot Elements" (with the current article name as the subtitle). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:20, 5 December 2005 (EST)		::::I just reread it again and tears came from my eyes when I hit the Helo stuff. ("Territory issues..." HAH!) It's not just the old "Hi, Bob" drinking game of The Bob Newhart Show working here; Mason hit it on the nose that this does point out what few elemental contrivances in the show are getting a bit overused. This is a good place for us to point these out, as I just did. If nothing else, we can rename this to "Overused Character and Plot Elements" (with the current article name as the subtitle). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:20, 5 December 2005 (EST)
	:::::There is no source, FYI. This was just me. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:04, 5 December 2005 (EST)		:::::There is no source, FYI. This was just me. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:04, 5 December 2005 (EST)

	::::::Okie-dokie. We can credit Peter and perhaps Jack (Daniels) or Old Grandad for the interesting article... :) You can blame me and Starbuck (the coffee, not the pilot) for my contributions. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:55, 5 December 2005 (EST)		::::::Okie-dokie. We can credit Peter and perhaps Jack (Daniels) or Old Grandad for the interesting article... :) You can blame me and Starbuck (the coffee, not the pilot) for my contributions. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:55, 5 December 2005 (EST)
Line 43:		Line 43:

	==Sillyness==		==Sillyness==
	I'm worried that the vast majority of points on this page don't appear to be remotely funny. I think there should be some minimal level of wit or irony required to remain on the drinking game. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 17:30, 19 February 2006 (EST)		I'm worried that the vast majority of points on this page don't appear to be remotely funny. I think there should be some minimal level of wit or irony required to remain on the drinking game. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 17:30, 19 February 2006 (EST)

	Agreed. In reference to the past bunch of edits, Im just trying to make it more readable by categorizing. [[User:Kkimball\|Kkimball]] 17:33, 19 February 2006 (EST)		Agreed. In reference to the past bunch of edits, Im just trying to make it more readable by categorizing. [[User:Kkimball\|Kkimball]] 17:33, 19 February 2006 (EST)