Talk:Starbuck (1980)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Merge? */ tweak

2007-08-21T21:59:01Z

Merge?: tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 21 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	:Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:Additionally, once I get around to really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Merge? */ link and indent tweaks

2007-08-21T21:58:35Z

Merge?: link and indent tweaks

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 21 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)		:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)
	==Merge?==		==Merge?==
	:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::The split was the result of [[Talk:~~Doctor_Zee~~\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing ~~the~~ "[[Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Merge? */ reply

2007-08-21T21:56:56Z

Merge?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor_Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		::The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor_Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
			::Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing the "[[Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Merge? */ of sysops and splits

2007-08-21T21:45:06Z

Merge?: of sysops and splits

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 21 August 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Merge?==		==Merge?==
	:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
			::The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor_Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

OTW at 21:31, 21 August 2007

2007-08-21T21:31:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 21 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is it correct that [[Starbuck (1980)]] is on patrol with [[Boomer (TOS)]], and not [[Boomer (1980)]]? (haven't seen the original series) --[[User:Manscher\|Manscher]] 09:05, 30 December 2006 (CST)		Is it correct that [[Starbuck (1980)]] is on patrol with [[Boomer (TOS)]], and not [[Boomer (1980)]]? (haven't seen the original series) --[[User:Manscher\|Manscher]] 09:05, 30 December 2006 (CST)
	:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)		:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)
			==Merge?==
			:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: TOS or 1980?

2006-12-30T17:27:32Z

TOS or 1980?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 30 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is it correct that [[Starbuck (1980)]] is on patrol with [[Boomer (TOS)]], and not [[Boomer (1980)]]? (haven't seen the original series) --[[User:Manscher\|Manscher]] 09:05, 30 December 2006 (CST)		Is it correct that [[Starbuck (1980)]] is on patrol with [[Boomer (TOS)]], and not [[Boomer (1980)]]? (haven't seen the original series) --[[User:Manscher\|Manscher]] 09:05, 30 December 2006 (CST)
			:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)

Manscher: Nor Boomer (1980)?

2006-12-30T15:05:48Z

Nor Boomer (1980)?

New page

Is it correct that [[Starbuck (1980)]] is on patrol with [[Boomer (TOS)]], and not [[Boomer (1980)]]? (haven't seen the original series) --[[User:Manscher|Manscher]] 09:05, 30 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 21 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	:Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:Additionally, once I get around to really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 21 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)		:That's kind of a tricky question. He is on patrol with Boomer, but the patrol was before they arrived at Earth (and the Boomer (1980) timeline begins). So that's either an early Boomer (1980) (since it falls before the normal 1980 timeline) or a late Boomer (TOS) (since it falls after the normal TOS timeline). I chose the latter, since I associate Boomer (1980) with the grey-haired veteran rather than as a front-line Viper pilot. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:27, 30 December 2006 (CST)
	==Merge?==		==Merge?==
	:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::The split was the result of [[Talk:~~Doctor_Zee~~\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing ~~the~~ "[[Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing "[[The Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		:This article is just a plot summary of [[The Return of Starbuck]]. I would suggest merging the content here into a sub-section of [[Starbuck (TOS)]] and re-directing the page. The character of Starbuck is essentially the same in TOS and this episode, I can't see what is gained by having two separate pages. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 16:31, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
	::The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor_Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)		::The split was the result of [[Talk:Doctor_Zee\|this conversation]] (which is really old, actually, and back before I was a sysop). The main thrust is that 1980 is a separate continuity, one which a lot of TOS fans probably wished didn't exist. Breaking out 1980 content into continuity specific articles allow those articles to be accurate within their own contexts without cross-contaminating each other (and diminishing the potential for contradictions). If this doctrine were carried out more strictly then we'd see a few more splits yet (one for ''Galactica'', for example), but 1980 has always been something of a pariah round here, and doesn't get the attention that some of the other continuities/series do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:45, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
			::Additionally, once I get around really digging through and analyzing the "[[Wheel of Fire]]" script, this article will see some love from that as well. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:56, 21 August 2007 (CDT)