Talk:Spin-off/Archive 1 - Revision history

Spencerian: /* Necessary? */ +merge complete

2007-07-23T18:14:29Z

Necessary?: +merge complete

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 23 July 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

			The article [[Continuities and continuations]] has been created per this talk page. This article and related ones are now redirects to the new, more germane article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:14, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: Changing my vote to merge

2007-07-21T10:45:00Z

Changing my vote to merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 21 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} ~~Exterminate because of reasons given~~. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{Keep}} Merging, as detailed below, sounds like a good idea. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:45, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Necessary? */ keep by merge vote

2007-07-20T23:56:09Z

Necessary?: keep by merge vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 20 July 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
			::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: Vote for merge.

2007-07-20T23:30:33Z

Vote for merge.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 20 July 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
			::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

RUSnooky: /* Necessary? */

2007-07-20T16:18:09Z

Necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 20 July 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
			::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).

Serenity: delete

2007-07-20T14:00:26Z

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 20 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
			::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* Necessary? */ vd

2007-07-20T10:35:23Z

Necessary?: vd

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 20 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
	:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
			::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

RUSnooky: Further thoughts

2007-07-19T13:36:19Z

Further thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 19 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
			:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)

RUSnooky: fixing link again

2007-07-19T13:35:16Z

fixing link again

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 19 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Necessary? ==		== Necessary? ==

	Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 \| Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)

RUSnooky: Fixing Link

2007-07-19T13:34:26Z

Fixing Link

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 19 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Necessary? ==		== Necessary? ==

	Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29\|Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 \| Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 23 July 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

			The article [[Continuities and continuations]] has been created per this talk page. This article and related ones are now redirects to the new, more germane article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:14, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 21 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)		:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} ~~Exterminate because of reasons given~~. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{Keep}} Merging, as detailed below, sounds like a good idea. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:45, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 20 July 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
	::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
			::'''{{Keep}} by Spencerian's merging idea.''' Definitely worthwhile to have an article here (like "Continuities and Continuations") detailing all the spin-offs, continuations, and the like, with this article being a redirect to the C&C article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 18:56, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 20 July 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).		::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).
			::'''{{Keep}} by merging.''' The article [[Retroactive continuity]] is most appropriate to move this information since the concept of spin-offs have been a ''very'' relevant topic to ''Battlestar's'' history, although we should rename that article to something like "Continuities and Continuations", which would have a brief detailing of what that means, and a combined article that would merge the relevant data from [[Spin-off]], [[Continuation]] and [[Re-imagining]] as appropriate, with cites to [[TSC]], [[Battlestar Atlantis]], [[Galactica 1980]], [[SDS]], and the [[Re-imagined Series]]. We don't need a generic article, no, but these items are definitely significant to warrant an article to relate the series concepts to each other. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:30, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 20 July 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
	::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)		::{{vd}} Exterminate because of reasons given. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:00, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
			::{{vd}} I made the recommendation in the first place--[[User:RUSnooky\|RUSnooky]] 11:18, 20 July 2007 (CDT).