Talk:Soldiers of the One/Archive 1 - Revision history

Pst001: /* merge with monotheist church? */

2010-11-08T22:29:06Z

merge with monotheist church?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 8 November 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::::fair enough. i'll shut up now. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 22:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Typhoeus: /* merge with monotheist church? */

2010-11-08T21:42:04Z

merge with monotheist church?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 8 November 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* merge with monotheist church? */ reply

2010-11-08T20:43:07Z

merge with monotheist church?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 8 November 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Pst001: /* merge with monotheist church? */

2010-11-08T20:22:24Z

merge with monotheist church?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 8 November 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* merge with monotheist church? */ not unusual

2010-11-08T14:08:12Z

merge with monotheist church?: not unusual

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 8 November 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 13:57, 8 November 2010

2010-11-08T13:57:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 8 November 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Pst001: /* merge with monotheist church? */ new section

2010-11-08T09:28:48Z

merge with monotheist church?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 8 November 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Should we include the members, i.e. [[Ada]], used in the [[Atlas Arena]] simulation?--[[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 01:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		Should we include the members, i.e. [[Ada]], used in the [[Atlas Arena]] simulation?--[[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 01:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			== merge with monotheist church? ==

			i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

DrWho42: /* Ada, etc. from the "Unvanquished" simulation */ new section

2010-10-15T01:57:54Z

Ada, etc. from the "Unvanquished" simulation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 15 October 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:: Alright, I will make additions to the articles, then. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 22:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)		:: Alright, I will make additions to the articles, then. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 22:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

			== [[Ada]], etc. from the "Unvanquished" simulation ==

			Should we include the members, i.e. [[Ada]], used in the [[Atlas Arena]] simulation?--[[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 01:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Sauron18: /* Infinity Symbol in Cylon Religion */

2009-08-02T22:15:43Z

Infinity Symbol in Cylon Religion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 2 August 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	: The Infinity Symbol is part of the Cylon religion, and was introduced in late Season 4 of BSG ("Islanded," as you said). So, yes, it's worth noting. And, if you'd be so kind, it can probably find a home in the [[Cylon Religion]] article as well. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)		: The Infinity Symbol is part of the Cylon religion, and was introduced in late Season 4 of BSG ("Islanded," as you said). So, yes, it's worth noting. And, if you'd be so kind, it can probably find a home in the [[Cylon Religion]] article as well. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

			:: Alright, I will make additions to the articles, then. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 22:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Infinity Symbol in Cylon Religion */ reply

2009-08-02T21:45:09Z

Infinity Symbol in Cylon Religion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 2 August 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I wanted to discuss it here first, and post the links to the props, but I think it's a very interesting connection that I wish had been made more obvious in the main show and wouldn't have required a prop auction for us to notice. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 19:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)		I wanted to discuss it here first, and post the links to the props, but I think it's a very interesting connection that I wish had been made more obvious in the main show and wouldn't have required a prop auction for us to notice. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 19:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

			: The Infinity Symbol is part of the Cylon religion, and was introduced in late Season 4 of BSG ("Islanded," as you said). So, yes, it's worth noting. And, if you'd be so kind, it can probably find a home in the [[Cylon Religion]] article as well. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 8 November 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			:::::fair enough. i'll shut up now. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 22:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 8 November 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::::Another reason to keep it separate (Don't know much what the final set of episodes do), is that the episodes that ''have'' aired make it clear that the [[Monotheist Church]] and the STO, while 'together' (nearly one and in the same for lack of better terms), the two are in fact, separate entities and in some cases, have separate agendas. --[[User:Typhoeus\|Typhoeus]] 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 8 November 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::: I think you'll find that it's best to keep this all separate, given what happens in the last 2 episodes. Just wait a few weeks. ;) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 8 November 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 8 November 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		i went ahead and included a small section about the STO in the [[Monotheist Church]] article, but since the STO is a branch of that church, i was wondering if it would be wise to join the two articles? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 09:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
	:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)		:Well, the STO are more prominent than the church proper and technically were introduced before the Mother and Ferras. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
			:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)