Talk:Sharon Agathon/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

2025-06-24T20:13:56Z

Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 24 June 2025
Line 100:		Line 100:
	== No Photo in Uniform? ==		== No Photo in Uniform? ==

	It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic.[[~~Image~~:Sharon_Agathon_LTjg.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Here's a small one, for instance.]]		It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic.[[File:Sharon_Agathon_LTjg.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Here's a small one, for instance.]]
	- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)		- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)
	:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:32Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

Str1977: /* "Valerii" was never her last name */

2009-03-31T10:00:43Z

"Valerii" was never her last name

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 31 March 2009
Line 89:		Line 89:
	::The number 8 model on Caprica during season one was using the ''Sharon Valerii'' identity, just as the Galactica copy was. That the Caprica agent didn't have much opportunity to use her last name isn't really relevant, in my opinion.--[[User:Hylas\|Hylas]] 10:59, 28 November 2006 (CST)		::The number 8 model on Caprica during season one was using the ''Sharon Valerii'' identity, just as the Galactica copy was. That the Caprica agent didn't have much opportunity to use her last name isn't really relevant, in my opinion.--[[User:Hylas\|Hylas]] 10:59, 28 November 2006 (CST)
	:::Of course she used Valerii's identity during season one, but I think it is inappropriate to use the name of an alias of hers in the text until events at the end of season two. When she identifies herself to Helo as a different Sharon, she should no longer be called Valerii. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 11:52, 28 November 2006 (CST)		:::Of course she used Valerii's identity during season one, but I think it is inappropriate to use the name of an alias of hers in the text until events at the end of season two. When she identifies herself to Helo as a different Sharon, she should no longer be called Valerii. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 11:52, 28 November 2006 (CST)

			::::But neither should she be called Agathon before she actually marries Helo. [[User:Str1977\|Str1977]] 10:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

	== Pegasus ==		== Pegasus ==

Str1977: /* No Photo in Uniform? */

2009-03-31T09:58:36Z

No Photo in Uniform?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 31 March 2009
Line 105:		Line 105:
	::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)		::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)
	:::::We already have one of the pictures in her profile. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:56, 5 March 2008 (CST)		:::::We already have one of the pictures in her profile. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:56, 5 March 2008 (CST)

			==BCE==

			Please, take note of [[Talk:Timeline_(RDM)#BCE_occurences\|this issue]]. [[User:Str1977\|Str1977]] 09:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* No Photo in Uniform? */ reply

2008-03-06T01:56:46Z

No Photo in Uniform?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 6 March 2008
Line 104:		Line 104:
	:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)		::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)
			:::::We already have one of the pictures in her profile. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:56, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Fredmdbud: /* No Photo in Uniform? */

2008-03-06T01:17:01Z

No Photo in Uniform?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 6 March 2008
Line 103:		Line 103:
	::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
	:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Spencerian: /* No Photo in Uniform? */

2007-04-17T23:46:11Z

No Photo in Uniform?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 17 April 2007
Line 102:		Line 102:
	:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)
	::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
			:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

OTW: /* No Photo in Uniform? */

2007-04-17T23:43:15Z

No Photo in Uniform?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 17 April 2007
Line 101:		Line 101:
	- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)		- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)
	:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)
			::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Sloan: /* No Photo in Uniform? */

2007-02-27T16:54:54Z

No Photo in Uniform?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 27 February 2007
Line 100:		Line 100:
	It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic.[[Image:Sharon_Agathon_LTjg.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Here's a small one, for instance.]]		It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic.[[Image:Sharon_Agathon_LTjg.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Here's a small one, for instance.]]
	- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)		- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)
			:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Keithustus: /* No Photo in Uniform? */ added small sample pic

2007-02-26T12:12:11Z

No Photo in Uniform?: added small sample pic

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 26 February 2007
Line 98:		Line 98:
	== No Photo in Uniform? ==		== No Photo in Uniform? ==

	It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic. - [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)		It's been months since the episode aired in which she was commissioned. Are there no good (close-up or profile) photos of her in a Colonial Fleet uniform? It would seem to be a significant improvement to her character bio if one were at the top of the page instead of her shackled pic.[[Image:Sharon_Agathon_LTjg.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Here's a small one, for instance.]]
			- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 6 March 2008
Line 104:		Line 104:
	:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)		::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)
			:::::We already have one of the pictures in her profile. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:56, 5 March 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 6 March 2008
Line 103:		Line 103:
	::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
	:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
			::::There are new season 4 promotional photos at www.galacticastation.com-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:17, 5 March 2008 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 17 April 2007
Line 102:		Line 102:
	:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)
	::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)		::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
			:::The tiny image may not work, but there should be some good screencaps to get from "The Woman King" or "The Passage". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:46, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 17 April 2007
Line 101:		Line 101:
	- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)		- [[User:Keithustus\|Keithustus]] 06:04, 26 February 2007 (CST)
	:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:There is no frontal pormo picture of her in uniform, AFAIK. What's the problem with the current picture? She was no officer for most of the time anyway, I don't think the current image is a problem. [[User:Sloan\|Sloan]] 10:54, 27 February 2007 (CST)
			::I think that her being an officer is a significant part of her character (as a defector). If her main image displayed this, it would be good. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Ragnar Valerii==		==Ragnar Valerii==
	On re-viewing, it seems to me that Ragnar Valerii is almost certainly Caprica Valerii. Why else would she be wearing a Colonial flight suit? On the other hand, what is she doing all the way at Ragnar rather than preparing for her mission on Caprica? Are there so few of her that she had to pull double duty that week? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 18:36, 30 December 2005 (EST)		On re-viewing, it seems to me that Ragnar Valerii is almost certainly Caprica Valerii. Why else would she be wearing a Colonial flight suit? On the other hand, what is she doing all the way at Ragnar rather than preparing for her mission on Caprica? Are there so few of her that she had to pull double duty that week? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 18:36, 30 December 2005 (EST)

	:That shes wearing the uniform is more likely a mistake, they hadn't thought of Caprica Valerii when they made the mini-series. Still, the two being one and the same is a good way to explain away said mistake. Her Caprica misson wouldn't really take any preparation, and the Cylons would probably make very efficient use of personnel.--[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 19:18, 30 December 2005 (EST)		:That shes wearing the uniform is more likely a mistake, they hadn't thought of Caprica Valerii when they made the mini-series. Still, the two being one and the same is a good way to explain away said mistake. Her Caprica misson wouldn't really take any preparation, and the Cylons would probably make very efficient use of personnel.--[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 19:18, 30 December 2005 (EST)
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::Actually, I got the impression that the Sharons on the Basestar were all naked because they were "fresh off the assembly line", as it were.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 20:49, 31 December 2005 (EST)		::::Actually, I got the impression that the Sharons on the Basestar were all naked because they were "fresh off the assembly line", as it were.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 20:49, 31 December 2005 (EST)
	:::::Basestars produce Cylons? I thought only the Resurrection Ship could do that (oops :-X) [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 01:27, 1 January 2006 (EST)		:::::Basestars produce Cylons? I thought only the Resurrection Ship could do that (oops :-X) [[User:Philwelch\|Philwelch]] 01:27, 1 January 2006 (EST)
	::::::I guess there are some consequences for making it all up as you go. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:19, 1 January 2006 (EST)		::::::I guess there are some consequences for making it all up as you go. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:19, 1 January 2006 (EST)

	Or--Humano-Cylons are individuals and dress (or not) as individuals and groups. Those aboard the Basestar had formed a community of sorts which saw no particular reason for clothes. The Sharon at Ragnar was one of those who--for reasons of her own (identification with her "sleeper" sister perhaps?) decided to wear a flight suit. [[User:Zahir\|Zahir]] 12:45, 28 January 2006 (EST)		Or--Humano-Cylons are individuals and dress (or not) as individuals and groups. Those aboard the Basestar had formed a community of sorts which saw no particular reason for clothes. The Sharon at Ragnar was one of those who--for reasons of her own (identification with her "sleeper" sister perhaps?) decided to wear a flight suit. [[User:Zahir\|Zahir]] 12:45, 28 January 2006 (EST)
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Any speculation on how fiber optics could interface via the arm in such away that the interface wouldn't appear on medical scans? --[[User:Mitchy\|Mitchy]] 11:16, 12 March 2006 (CST)		Any speculation on how fiber optics could interface via the arm in such away that the interface wouldn't appear on medical scans? --[[User:Mitchy\|Mitchy]] 11:16, 12 March 2006 (CST)
	:Grace speculated that it was nanotechnology in an interview. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 21:53, 19 May 2006 (CDT)		:Grace speculated that it was nanotechnology in an interview. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 21:53, 19 May 2006 (CDT)
	::Link? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 22:56, 19 May 2006 (CDT)		::Link? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 22:56, 19 May 2006 (CDT)
	:::One of the three linked to on this thread: http://s9.invisionfree.com/Ragnar_Anchorage/index.php?showtopic=4672		:::One of the three linked to on this thread: http://s9.invisionfree.com/Ragnar_Anchorage/index.php?showtopic=4672
	I don't recall which. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 08:07, 20 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't recall which. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 08:07, 20 May 2006 (CDT)
Line 58:		Line 58:
	:I agree as well. ''Finally'' we can have a clear diffeentiation! Making the change now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 22:59, 6 October 2006 (CDT)		:I agree as well. ''Finally'' we can have a clear diffeentiation! Making the change now. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 22:59, 6 October 2006 (CDT)
	::In which case the other one should become simply Sharon Valerii. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:23, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::In which case the other one should become simply Sharon Valerii. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:23, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::Disagree on that point, since there's still ambiguity present during the first two seasons. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:25, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::Disagree on that point, since there's still ambiguity present during the first two seasons. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:25, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Sharon Valerii (Caprica copy) redirects to Sharon Agathon, and Sharon Valerii (Galactica copy) will redirect to Sharon Valerii, so anyone searching using those terms will be okay. Anyone searching for Sharon Valerii will go to Boomer's page and see the disambiguation heading telling them to go to Sharon Agathon if they were looking for her, so that's no real problem. Also, wouldn't it be more precise for this page to be "Sharon Valerii Agathon", like "Cally Henderson Tyrol"? [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 09:29, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::Sharon Valerii (Caprica copy) redirects to Sharon Agathon, and Sharon Valerii (Galactica copy) will redirect to Sharon Valerii, so anyone searching using those terms will be okay. Anyone searching for Sharon Valerii will go to Boomer's page and see the disambiguation heading telling them to go to Sharon Agathon if they were looking for her, so that's no real problem. Also, wouldn't it be more precise for this page to be "Sharon Valerii Agathon", like "Cally Henderson Tyrol"? [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 09:29, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Cally, it would seem, chose to take her husband's name while keeping her maiden name. Sharon did not neccessarily go the same route, and may have dropped "Valerii" all together. As Adama used "Sharon Agathon" to swear her in, I say that's pretty good evidence that that is officially and legally her name. Unless she's referred to as "Sharon Valerii Agathon" in the future, I say we stick with this name. [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 11:15, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::Cally, it would seem, chose to take her husband's name while keeping her maiden name. Sharon did not neccessarily go the same route, and may have dropped "Valerii" all together. As Adama used "Sharon Agathon" to swear her in, I say that's pretty good evidence that that is officially and legally her name. Unless she's referred to as "Sharon Valerii Agathon" in the future, I say we stick with this name. [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 11:15, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
Line 64:		Line 64:
	:::::::That makes sense, but why don't we change Sharon Valerii (Galactica copy) to Sharon Valerii ("Boomer"), since that's a more accurate distinction, one which is actually used in the show. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 11:58, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::That makes sense, but why don't we change Sharon Valerii (Galactica copy) to Sharon Valerii ("Boomer"), since that's a more accurate distinction, one which is actually used in the show. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 11:58, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::::::Well, we could make G-Boomer's page just "Sharon Valerii," since there is a Number Eight and Sharon Agathon page that distingushes the other models. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 12:26, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::::::Well, we could make G-Boomer's page just "Sharon Valerii," since there is a Number Eight and Sharon Agathon page that distingushes the other models. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 12:26, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::::::No. To repeat - someone searching for "Sharon Valerii" during the first two seasons should be sent to a disambig page, not G-Sharon's page. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:53, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::::No. To repeat - someone searching for "Sharon Valerii" during the first two seasons should be sent to a disambig page, not G-Sharon's page. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:53, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::::::::Okay, I can understand that. I guess we could keep the title as it is now, that could work. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 12:58, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::::::::Okay, I can understand that. I guess we could keep the title as it is now, that could work. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 12:58, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::::::::Sharon Valerii ("Boomer") is the most logical title. She's called Boomer repeatedly on the show, never Galactica-Sharon. Sharon Agathon is always Sharon. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:39, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::::::Sharon Valerii ("Boomer") is the most logical title. She's called Boomer repeatedly on the show, never Galactica-Sharon. Sharon Agathon is always Sharon. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:39, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::::::::::I'd settle for "Sharon "Boomer" Valerii", but I prefer the "(Galactica copy)" nomenclature, as it matches our current nomenclature for Cylon copies and is extendable to future copies. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 13:43, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::::::::::I'd settle for "Sharon "Boomer" Valerii", but I prefer the "(Galactica copy)" nomenclature, as it matches our current nomenclature for Cylon copies and is extendable to future copies. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 13:43, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::::::::::Calling them by place names works well enough informally, but "Boomer" is a distinguishing point between them from the show itself, and is less confusing now that she's not on Galactica. The only Cylon officially referred to by place name nomenclature is Caprica-Six. Number Three, who calls that Six, "Caprica", calls Boomer, "Boomer". This is the nomenclature being used by the characters. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:51, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::::::::Calling them by place names works well enough informally, but "Boomer" is a distinguishing point between them from the show itself, and is less confusing now that she's not on Galactica. The only Cylon officially referred to by place name nomenclature is Caprica-Six. Number Three, who calls that Six, "Caprica", calls Boomer, "Boomer". This is the nomenclature being used by the characters. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 13:51, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::::::::::::Your argument is persuasive, but I'm a little concerned that S. Agathon will use "Boomer" as her call sign now that she's an officer. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:12, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::::::::::::Your argument is persuasive, but I'm a little concerned that S. Agathon will use "Boomer" as her call sign now that she's an officer. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:12, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::::::::::::Nothing points to that. I have a feeling that they'll reduce confusion by just keeping her as "Sharon". [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 14:42, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::::::::::Nothing points to that. I have a feeling that they'll reduce confusion by just keeping her as "Sharon". [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 14:42, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::::::::::::::Or, she could easily just as much use another call sign for fear of the "taint" on the "Boomer" call sign. Hell, she may end up calling herself "Sheba". ^_^ Seriously, while I suspect that she'll end up with a call sign, I don't think it'll be Boomer, and I think we could easily assign that to G-Sharon.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai\|み使い]]'''</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai\|Mitsukai]]'''''</font> 10:49, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:::::::::::::::Or, she could easily just as much use another call sign for fear of the "taint" on the "Boomer" call sign. Hell, she may end up calling herself "Sheba". ^_^ Seriously, while I suspect that she'll end up with a call sign, I don't think it'll be Boomer, and I think we could easily assign that to G-Sharon.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai\|み使い]]'''</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai\|Mitsukai]]'''''</font> 10:49, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::::On top of it, S&C states that we should use First Name Last Name unless the middle name is needed for disambiguation. BTW, do we have any canon source that Cally kept "Henderson" as her middle name, or did it just seem logical? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:51, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		::::::On top of it, S&C states that we should use First Name Last Name unless the middle name is needed for disambiguation. BTW, do we have any canon source that Cally kept "Henderson" as her middle name, or did it just seem logical? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:51, 7 October 2006 (CDT)

	:Also agree. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:24, 7 October 2006 (CDT)		:Also agree. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:24, 7 October 2006 (CDT)

	:Regarding the callsign, in [http://galactica-station.blogspot.com/2006/10/recalling-callis.html this transcript] of a James Callis interview, she is referred to as Sharon ''"Athena"'' Agathon. Maybe Mitsukai is onto something! But probably just a typo... --[[User:Noindiecred\|Noindiecred]] 13:35, 12 October 2006 (CDT)		:Regarding the callsign, in [http://galactica-station.blogspot.com/2006/10/recalling-callis.html this transcript] of a James Callis interview, she is referred to as Sharon ''"Athena"'' Agathon. Maybe Mitsukai is onto something! But probably just a typo... --[[User:Noindiecred\|Noindiecred]] 13:35, 12 October 2006 (CDT)