Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:43Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)		Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	:I agree. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	== Callsign/Nickname? again ==		== Callsign/Nickname? again ==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Callsign/Nickname? again */ reply

2006-10-16T06:25:28Z

Callsign/Nickname? again: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 16 October 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Changing "Callsign" to "Nickname", as Raiders (insofar as we know) don't have Callsigns - they're essentially like hunting dogs, and for all we know, the Cylons call him "Spot" (assuming "he" is a he to begin with). In short, it was the pilots who named the Raider as such and thus not a callsign.--<font color="#4b0082">[[User:Mitsukai\|み使い]]</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">''[[User_talk:Mitsukai\|Mitsukai]]''</font> 00:31, 16 October 2006 (CDT)		Changing "Callsign" to "Nickname", as Raiders (insofar as we know) don't have Callsigns - they're essentially like hunting dogs, and for all we know, the Cylons call him "Spot" (assuming "he" is a he to begin with). In short, it was the pilots who named the Raider as such and thus not a callsign.--<font color="#4b0082">[[User:Mitsukai\|み使い]]</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">''[[User_talk:Mitsukai\|Mitsukai]]''</font> 00:31, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
			: Cool. Thanks for changing it. :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 01:25, 16 October 2006 (CDT)

Mitsukai: Callsign/Nickname? again

2006-10-16T05:31:37Z

Callsign/Nickname? again

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 16 October 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)

			== Callsign/Nickname? again ==

			Changing "Callsign" to "Nickname", as Raiders (insofar as we know) don't have Callsigns - they're essentially like hunting dogs, and for all we know, the Cylons call him "Spot" (assuming "he" is a he to begin with). In short, it was the pilots who named the Raider as such and thus not a callsign.--<font color="#4b0082">[[User:Mitsukai\|み使い]]</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">''[[User_talk:Mitsukai\|Mitsukai]]''</font> 00:31, 16 October 2006 (CDT)

Saforrest: Talk:Scar (fightercraft) moved to Talk:Scar (Raider)

2006-02-05T06:06:52Z

Talk:Scar (fightercraft) moved to Talk:Scar (Raider)

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:06, 5 February 2006
(No difference)

April Arcus: /* Article name */

2006-02-05T02:49:35Z

Article name

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 5 February 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)

			:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: /* Article name */

2006-02-05T01:48:26Z

Article name

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 5 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)		Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

			:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Undc23: oops, sorry

2006-02-05T01:40:56Z

oops, sorry

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 5 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	~~== Article name ==~~

	Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine.

	== Article name ==		== Article name ==

	Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)		Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Undc23: Article name

2006-02-05T01:40:23Z

Article name

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 5 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine.		Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine.

			== Article name ==

			Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Undc23: Article name

2006-02-05T01:40:17Z

Article name

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 5 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			== Article name ==

			Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine.

Spencerian at 02:24, 1 February 2006

2006-02-01T02:24:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 1 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)		Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			:I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)