Talk:Sacrifice/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:49Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Scifi.com is now calling this episode "Sacrifices", plural. Could this be a typo (it's only on one page), or is the name actually different? --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:24, 4 February 2006 (EST)		Scifi.com is now calling this episode "Sacrifices", plural. Could this be a typo (it's only on one page), or is the name actually different? --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:24, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	:Moore called it "Sacrifice" in the singular in the podcast. Let's leave it be until Friday. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 17:25, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:Moore called it "Sacrifice" in the singular in the podcast. Let's leave it be until Friday. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 17:25, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	::As do all other textual references on the site. Must have been a typo. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 22:10, 10 February 2006 (EST)		::As do all other textual references on the site. Must have been a typo. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 22:10, 10 February 2006 (EST)

BklynBruzer at 17:52, 7 September 2006

2006-09-07T17:52:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 7 September 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Yeah, that's what I figured. Doesn't hurt to keep an eye out, though. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 06:27, 9 March 2006 (CST)		Yeah, that's what I figured. Doesn't hurt to keep an eye out, though. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 06:27, 9 March 2006 (CST)
			==Minor Update==
			I filled in the Guest Stars section with the names and IMDb links for the actors who played Page, Vinson and Chu. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 12:52, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

FIDS: /* I noticed something that might be important, probably not though. */

2006-03-09T12:27:31Z

I noticed something that might be important, probably not though.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 9 March 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:

	I don't think this is important. They've just using the same pool of minor actors from around Vancouver. Happens all the time. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 14:02, 6 March 2006 (CST)		I don't think this is important. They've just using the same pool of minor actors from around Vancouver. Happens all the time. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 14:02, 6 March 2006 (CST)

			Yeah, that's what I figured. Doesn't hurt to keep an eye out, though. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 06:27, 9 March 2006 (CST)

The Merovingian at 20:02, 6 March 2006

2006-03-06T20:02:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 6 March 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Did anyone else notice that one of the terrorists was the same actor that played the captain in [[Flesh and Bone]]. If this wasn't just a casting mistake than it means one of two things; one, that the captain of the [[Gemenon Traveller]] is dead now (this one doesn't really mean very much except that he's dead), and two that the captain of the Gemenon Traveller is not dead and that was infact another copy of him and he is a Cylon. I'll be the first one to say how unconceivable this is just by the fact that both episodes involved a cylon. It would stand to reason that the cylons wouldn't have more than one sleeper agent of each model so as to avoid confusion and suspicion. So with that in mind no more than one of the "Eric Breker" cylons (that's the actor in both episodes) could be a sleeper agent, and my money would be on the Gemenon Traveller captain. Anyways, that's my peice, it's in your court now. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 02:49, 6 March 2006 (CST)		Did anyone else notice that one of the terrorists was the same actor that played the captain in [[Flesh and Bone]]. If this wasn't just a casting mistake than it means one of two things; one, that the captain of the [[Gemenon Traveller]] is dead now (this one doesn't really mean very much except that he's dead), and two that the captain of the Gemenon Traveller is not dead and that was infact another copy of him and he is a Cylon. I'll be the first one to say how unconceivable this is just by the fact that both episodes involved a cylon. It would stand to reason that the cylons wouldn't have more than one sleeper agent of each model so as to avoid confusion and suspicion. So with that in mind no more than one of the "Eric Breker" cylons (that's the actor in both episodes) could be a sleeper agent, and my money would be on the Gemenon Traveller captain. Anyways, that's my peice, it's in your court now. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 02:49, 6 March 2006 (CST)

			I don't think this is important. They've just using the same pool of minor actors from around Vancouver. Happens all the time. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 14:02, 6 March 2006 (CST)

FIDS: I noticed something that might be important, probably not though.

2006-03-06T08:49:28Z

I noticed something that might be important, probably not though.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 6 March 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I ''assume'' that could go in "Analysis" instead of notes--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:19, 14 February 2006 (EST)		I ''assume'' that could go in "Analysis" instead of notes--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:19, 14 February 2006 (EST)

			== I noticed something that might be important, probably not though. ==

			Did anyone else notice that one of the terrorists was the same actor that played the captain in [[Flesh and Bone]]. If this wasn't just a casting mistake than it means one of two things; one, that the captain of the [[Gemenon Traveller]] is dead now (this one doesn't really mean very much except that he's dead), and two that the captain of the Gemenon Traveller is not dead and that was infact another copy of him and he is a Cylon. I'll be the first one to say how unconceivable this is just by the fact that both episodes involved a cylon. It would stand to reason that the cylons wouldn't have more than one sleeper agent of each model so as to avoid confusion and suspicion. So with that in mind no more than one of the "Eric Breker" cylons (that's the actor in both episodes) could be a sleeper agent, and my money would be on the Gemenon Traveller captain. Anyways, that's my peice, it's in your court now. --[[User:FIDS\|FIDS]] 02:49, 6 March 2006 (CST)

Shane: /* Not that this has any bearing... */ - comments

2006-02-15T19:11:05Z

Not that this has any bearing...: - comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 15 February 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)		No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			: Maybe... :( It was good death scene. No showing of him dieing in the lounge, but just showing up in the morge. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] 14:11, 15 February 2006 (EST)

	It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)		It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 00:19, 15 February 2006

2006-02-15T00:19:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 15 February 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)		It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)


			I ''assume'' that could go in "Analysis" instead of notes--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:19, 14 February 2006 (EST)

Rexpop: /* Not that this has any bearing... */

2006-02-15T00:05:09Z

Not that this has any bearing...

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 15 February 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)		No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)

			It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 21:24, 14 February 2006

2006-02-14T21:24:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 14 February 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	But the death of Billy was really sad. Billy was a great chaecter. I was hoping just for shots that skinned him; Not kill him. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] 00:08, 14 February 2006 (EST)		But the death of Billy was really sad. Billy was a great chaecter. I was hoping just for shots that skinned him; Not kill him. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] 00:08, 14 February 2006 (EST)

			No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)

Shane: Not that this has any bearing...

2006-02-14T05:08:47Z

Not that this has any bearing...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:08, 14 February 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Good job on this page all, It takes a lot to impress me, and I think you guys did well......... Wow a blue car!		Good job on this page all, It takes a lot to impress me, and I think you guys did well......... Wow a blue car!
	[[User:Bane Grievver\|Bane Grievver]] 21:43, 12 February 2006 (EST)		[[User:Bane Grievver\|Bane Grievver]] 21:43, 12 February 2006 (EST)

			== Not that this has any bearing... ==

			But the death of Billy was really sad. Billy was a great chaecter. I was hoping just for shots that skinned him; Not kill him. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] 00:08, 14 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Scifi.com is now calling this episode "Sacrifices", plural. Could this be a typo (it's only on one page), or is the name actually different? --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:24, 4 February 2006 (EST)		Scifi.com is now calling this episode "Sacrifices", plural. Could this be a typo (it's only on one page), or is the name actually different? --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:24, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	:Moore called it "Sacrifice" in the singular in the podcast. Let's leave it be until Friday. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 17:25, 4 February 2006 (EST)		:Moore called it "Sacrifice" in the singular in the podcast. Let's leave it be until Friday. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 17:25, 4 February 2006 (EST)

	::As do all other textual references on the site. Must have been a typo. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 22:10, 10 February 2006 (EST)		::As do all other textual references on the site. Must have been a typo. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 22:10, 10 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 15 February 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)		No. Billy became a bad character, through lack of use. By this point in the series, past the end of season 1, he had gotten so little to do that it wasn't worth counting him amongst the main cast. Frankly, RDM did the right thing by killing him off, thus giving him a fitting sendoff rather than let him become painfully boring (a problem encountered on later Star Treks alot). I was happy to see him go, while I also felt that it was a good death scene.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 16:24, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			: Maybe... :( It was good death scene. No showing of him dieing in the lounge, but just showing up in the morge. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] 14:11, 15 February 2006 (EST)

	It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)		It may be worth putting a little paragraph or two in the notes section describing the circumstances surrounding the lack of use of the character (i.e that the actor was being offered other series or pilots). The RDM podcast sums it up pretty well. --[[User:Rexpop\|Rexpop]] 19:05, 14 February 2006 (EST)