Talk:Resurrection Ship/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

2025-06-24T20:13:09Z

Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 24 June 2025
Line 125:		Line 125:
	Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture?		Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture?

	[[~~Image~~:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]		[[File:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)		: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)		:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Sauron18" to "[[User:Sauron18"

2025-06-19T21:58:20Z

Text replacement - "[[Sauron18" to "[[User:Sauron18"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 19 June 2025
Line 70:		Line 70:
	:::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST)		:::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST)

	::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 25 February 2006		::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 25 February 2006

	:::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall\|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST)		:::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall\|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:04Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)		:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

	:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)		:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)

	:::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006		:::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout\|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST)		Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout\|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST)

	:The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:42, 7 February 2006 (EST)		:The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:42, 7 February 2006 (EST)

	::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)		::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)
Line 95:		Line 95:
	The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006		The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006

	:I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:18, 26 June 2006 (CDT)		:I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:18, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

	::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT)		::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

Sauron18: /* Main Image */

2007-01-24T03:35:22Z

Main Image

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 24 January 2007
Line 128:		Line 128:
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)		: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)
			:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Main Image */ + agree

2007-01-24T03:14:34Z

Main Image: + agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 24 January 2007
Line 127:		Line 127:
	[[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]		[[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
			: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Sauron18: /* Main Image */

2007-01-24T02:36:01Z

Main Image

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 24 January 2007
Line 120:		Line 120:

	::::::: Okay. Thanks. I now feel like I'm on the same page as you. I'd forgotten about the flash-back aspect of Downloaded. Hmm. I'll have to think on this some more. --[[User:Day\|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day\|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|Admin]])</sup> 15:41, 27 June 2006 (CDT)		::::::: Okay. Thanks. I now feel like I'm on the same page as you. I'd forgotten about the flash-back aspect of Downloaded. Hmm. I'll have to think on this some more. --[[User:Day\|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day\|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|Admin]])</sup> 15:41, 27 June 2006 (CDT)


			==Main Image==
			Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture?

			[[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]
			It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)

CalculatinAvatar: pro-cathedral; anti-hyphen (a different hyphen, obviously)

2006-06-30T00:30:22Z

pro-cathedral; anti-hyphen (a different hyphen, obviously)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 30 June 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::No there have been interviews and stuff talking about it's design: it's supposed to look a bit like a cathedral, then again a big antenna, then again the "ribs" make it look almost alive. No, the head-on look only has a vague similarity to the Colonial Emblem. Gary Hutzel did say they got a bit of idea for it based on some early battlestar concept art (with even more structural ribbing that sort of thing), but not really. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 17:12, 29 June 2006 (CDT)		::::::No there have been interviews and stuff talking about it's design: it's supposed to look a bit like a cathedral, then again a big antenna, then again the "ribs" make it look almost alive. No, the head-on look only has a vague similarity to the Colonial Emblem. Gary Hutzel did say they got a bit of idea for it based on some early battlestar concept art (with even more structural ribbing that sort of thing), but not really. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 17:12, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

			:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

	:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)		:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)
Line 26:		Line 27:
	::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)		::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)

			:::As a style point, I would omit the hyphen. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

	==Speculation==		==Speculation==

The Merovingian at 22:12, 29 June 2006

2006-06-29T22:12:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 29 June 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::::Speaking of the way the ship looks, it struck me that the ship's head-on construction is really similar to the Battlestar emblem [[http://www.game-warden.com/forum/images/avatars/BRTL_avs.jpg]] I'm sure someone has already thought of this, and I've seen evidence of people hinting around it, but does anyone have anything to say about it? Have the writers said anything? Just thought it should be looked at more closely here.--[[User:Gallion\|Gallion]] 14:02, 29 June 2006 (CDT)		:::::Speaking of the way the ship looks, it struck me that the ship's head-on construction is really similar to the Battlestar emblem [[http://www.game-warden.com/forum/images/avatars/BRTL_avs.jpg]] I'm sure someone has already thought of this, and I've seen evidence of people hinting around it, but does anyone have anything to say about it? Have the writers said anything? Just thought it should be looked at more closely here.--[[User:Gallion\|Gallion]] 14:02, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

			::::::No there have been interviews and stuff talking about it's design: it's supposed to look a bit like a cathedral, then again a big antenna, then again the "ribs" make it look almost alive. No, the head-on look only has a vague similarity to the Colonial Emblem. Gary Hutzel did say they got a bit of idea for it based on some early battlestar concept art (with even more structural ribbing that sort of thing), but not really. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 17:12, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

Gallion at 19:02, 29 June 2006

2006-06-29T19:02:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 29 June 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::: The Resurrection ship in The Pegasus episode look more like an original basestar rather than a triangalur Prism.		:::: The Resurrection ship in The Pegasus episode look more like an original basestar rather than a triangalur Prism.

			:::::Speaking of the way the ship looks, it struck me that the ship's head-on construction is really similar to the Battlestar emblem [[http://www.game-warden.com/forum/images/avatars/BRTL_avs.jpg]] I'm sure someone has already thought of this, and I've seen evidence of people hinting around it, but does anyone have anything to say about it? Have the writers said anything? Just thought it should be looked at more closely here.--[[User:Gallion\|Gallion]] 14:02, 29 June 2006 (CDT)


	:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)		:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)
Line 20:		Line 23:

	::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)		::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)


	==Speculation==		==Speculation==

Day: /* Interior */

2006-06-27T20:41:20Z

Interior

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 27 June 2006
Line 110:		Line 110:

	::::::'''StrayCat0:''' I'm thinking sort of along the same lines as you are :) --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 07:36 27 June 2006 (CDT)		::::::'''StrayCat0:''' I'm thinking sort of along the same lines as you are :) --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 07:36 27 June 2006 (CDT)

			::::::: Okay. Thanks. I now feel like I'm on the same page as you. I'd forgotten about the flash-back aspect of Downloaded. Hmm. I'll have to think on this some more. --[[User:Day\|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day\|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|Admin]])</sup> 15:41, 27 June 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 24 June 2025
Line 125:		Line 125:
	Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture?		Hey, I was wondering, and have been for a while, if perhaps we should use Alain Rivard's render of the Resurrection Ship as a main picture?

	[[~~Image~~:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]		[[File:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)		: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)		:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 19 June 2025
Line 70:		Line 70:
	:::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST)		:::No. From what we gathered in "Resurrection Ship, part I" the Res Ship was built ''after'' Galactica escaped outside of the range of the Cylon homeworld.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 19:48, 25 February 2006 (EST)

	::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 25 February 2006		::::Thats not true, it wasn't built just for that. We don't actually get the direct Cylon Explanation, but the ship is too massive to build in that short amount of time. They already had the ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 25 February 2006

	:::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall\|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST)		:::::We have no idea how long it would take the Cylons to build a Resurrection Ship. It's very possible they built it after Galactica's escape. --[[User:Redwall\|Redwall]] 20:11, 25 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)		:::::::It looks very much like a Gothic cathedral to me, to the point of having thought of the resemblence before; the symbolism is really rather cute. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 19:30, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

	:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)		:::::Correct for values of "more" == "not at all". --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:20, 7 January 2006 (EST)

	:::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006		:::::I think we should wait for Ragnar Anchorage or someone else to post better caps, if by the end of today no one has, I'll give a link to a site that does have them up already, though they are smaller (by format) than the ones RA normally posts..--[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 7 January 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout\|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST)		Is there either a suitable nomenclature to refer to any Cylon with a biological component? Since the resurrection ship can download both Humano-Cylons and Raiders, I wanted a way to refer to both with a single term. Bio-Cylon seemed appropriate, though I now see it's already been negatively hijacked by original series purists. Other than the blurb I added at the end, this article refers exclusively to the resurrection of the humanoid form, which, we now know from "[[Scar]]", is technically insufficient. I wouldn't want to clutter up the entire article with the hybrid reference; a single clarification would suffice. I don't think my addition quite does the trick, though. --[[User:Timtrout\|Timtrout]] 02:33, 7 February 2006 (EST)

	:The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:42, 7 February 2006 (EST)		:The matter was under fairly heated discussion recently. [[Humano-Cylon]] is the term currently in use, but I expect this to change in the near future. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:42, 7 February 2006 (EST)

	::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)		::If you're looking for a catch-all term referring to both humanoid Cylons and Raiders (which are kind of the step halfway between humanoid Cylons and Centurions), I would go with "bio-mechanical models".--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 03:35, 7 February 2006 (EST)
Line 95:		Line 95:
	The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006		The "Shadowed" one is the screencap from the actual episode. He's also got a neat model of old Ressy. Either way, it could always go in a BTS section, or just be mentioned, but I thought it looked perfect. It doesn't have the tub, but it's still the room. I dunno. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 01:33 26 June 2006

	:I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 02:18, 26 June 2006 (CDT)		:I don't believe there's any indication that this room is on board the Resurrection Ship. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 02:18, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

	::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT)		::Yeah, for all we know her consciousness just got stored and woke up later. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 07:29, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 24 January 2007
Line 128:		Line 128:
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
	: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)		: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)
			:: Cool. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 21:35, 23 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 24 January 2007
Line 127:		Line 127:
	[[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]		[[Image:Resurrection Ship.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Resurrection Ship by Alain Rivard]]
	It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)		It's a very good and very clear picture of the Resurrection Ship, and it's the official one.....I don't know, or at least use it in a BTS section or something mentioning it. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 20:36, 23 January 2007 (CST)
			: Agreed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:14, 23 January 2007 (CST)