Talk:Prison Barge inmates/Archive 1 - Revision history

Mercifull: Talk:Grid Rats moved to Talk:Prison Barge inmates

2007-01-16T14:41:04Z

Talk:Grid Rats moved to Talk:Prison Barge inmates

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:41, 16 January 2007
(No difference)

Steelviper: /* Possible merge scenario */ concur with merc

2007-01-16T13:48:14Z

Possible merge scenario: concur with merc

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 16 January 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)		Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)
	:''Inmates'' is better than ''prisoners'' imo --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:15, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:''Inmates'' is better than ''prisoners'' imo --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:15, 15 January 2007 (CST)
			::I agree that inmates helps avoid the prison prisoners repetition. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:48, 16 January 2007 (CST)

Mercifull: /* Possible merge scenario */

2007-01-15T16:15:53Z

Possible merge scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 15 January 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)		Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)
			:''Inmates'' is better than ''prisoners'' imo --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:15, 15 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Possible merge scenario */ what do we name the main article, now?

2007-01-15T14:57:48Z

Possible merge scenario: what do we name the main article, now?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 15 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)
	::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)		::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)

			Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)

Mercifull: /* Possible merge scenario */

2007-01-15T13:46:46Z

Possible merge scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 15 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)
	:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)
			::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Possible merge scenario */ concur

2007-01-15T13:27:44Z

Possible merge scenario: concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 15 January 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)		:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)
	:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)
			:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity: /* Possible merge scenario */

2007-01-13T12:07:59Z

Possible merge scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 13 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)		We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)
	:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)		:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)
			:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: Merge is probably appropo

2007-01-13T04:57:11Z

Merge is probably appropo

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 13 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)		We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)
			:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Possible merge scenario

2007-01-13T03:01:07Z

Possible merge scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 13 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Short of saying who the "Grid Rats" were, I don't see how this can be expanded. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)		: Short of saying who the "Grid Rats" were, I don't see how this can be expanded. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
	:: I'm going to remove the "expand" tag, as you've both demonstrated why it's not really needed/useful. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:37, 22 December 2006 (CST)		:: I'm going to remove the "expand" tag, as you've both demonstrated why it's not really needed/useful. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:37, 22 December 2006 (CST)

			== Possible merge scenario ==

			We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: removing expand tag

2006-12-22T17:37:55Z

removing expand tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 22 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'm not sure what more can be expanded on this one. I've not heard this term used before, which means there is an extremely high probablity that it comes from Baltar's Escape (one of the few episodes I've not seen at this point). Other than adding an episode citation, or a quote that demonstrates its usage, I'm not sure what more can really be expanded on this. I suppose we could provide a picture of the prisoners aboard the Prison Barge. I'm just torn about whether this deserves expansion, or just ought to be deleted (since it's just a one-off terminology entry). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:13, 20 February 2006 (EST)		I'm not sure what more can be expanded on this one. I've not heard this term used before, which means there is an extremely high probablity that it comes from Baltar's Escape (one of the few episodes I've not seen at this point). Other than adding an episode citation, or a quote that demonstrates its usage, I'm not sure what more can really be expanded on this. I suppose we could provide a picture of the prisoners aboard the Prison Barge. I'm just torn about whether this deserves expansion, or just ought to be deleted (since it's just a one-off terminology entry). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:13, 20 February 2006 (EST)
	: Short of saying who the "Grid Rats" were, I don't see how this can be expanded. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)		: Short of saying who the "Grid Rats" were, I don't see how this can be expanded. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
			:: I'm going to remove the "expand" tag, as you've both demonstrated why it's not really needed/useful. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:37, 22 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 16 January 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)		Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)
	:''Inmates'' is better than ''prisoners'' imo --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:15, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:''Inmates'' is better than ''prisoners'' imo --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:15, 15 January 2007 (CST)
			::I agree that inmates helps avoid the prison prisoners repetition. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:48, 16 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 15 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)
	::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)		::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)

			Nice. The question now is what do we name the main article? '''Prison Barge prisoners''', with all terms redirecting to it? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 08:57, 15 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 15 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)
	:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)		:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)
			::I agree with the merge --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 07:46, 15 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 15 January 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)		:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)
	:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)
			:Interchangable terminology. No significant differences in usage or connotation. Merge is fine by me. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:27, 15 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 13 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)		We may want to just merge all the terms, "bilge rats", "barge lice", and "grid rats" into one article. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:01, 12 January 2007 (CST)
	:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)		:It certainly makes sense, as they all seem to describe the same thing. (Never watched any TOS, perhaps I should rectify that sometime soon.) [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 22:57, 12 January 2007 (CST)
			:Yeah, the less tiny articles, the better. Especially when they are pretty much about the same thing --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 06:07, 13 January 2007 (CST)