Talk:Oein Parker/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: moved Talk:Deadbolt to Talk:Oein Parker: proper name per nameplate

2009-08-12T02:54:36Z

moved Talk:Deadbolt to Talk:Oein Parker: proper name per nameplate

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:54, 12 August 2009
(No difference)

2009-02-12T04:03:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 12 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
	::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:33, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:33, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
			:::Oh, it's mentioned. Hotdog refers to both Spinner and Deadbolt in the wireless chatter. I ''just'' re-watched the episode. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 04:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

2007-08-31T10:33:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 31 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)		The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
	:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
	::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain".		::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:33, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

2007-08-31T10:33:08Z

Canon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 31 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)		The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
	:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
			::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain".

2007-08-31T07:56:14Z

Canon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 31 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Canon? ==		== Canon? ==

	The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)		The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42\|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
			:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

2007-08-31T01:59:11Z

Canon?

New page

== Canon? ==

The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 12 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
	::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:33, 31 August 2007 (CDT)		::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:33, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
			:::Oh, it's mentioned. Hotdog refers to both Spinner and Deadbolt in the wireless chatter. I ''just'' re-watched the episode. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 04:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)