Talk:Numerology/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:41Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher\|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)		::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher\|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

	:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)		:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

	::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)		::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

	*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)		*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: /* The infamous 23 */ - go for it

2007-05-16T13:10:26Z

The infamous 23: - go for it

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 16 May 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:

	I've noticed the number 23 pop up a couple of times. It's pretty significant given the status of the number in general, but does anyone else have any objection in adding it? Off the time of my head, I've only got two examples. Even if this remains the only appearances, anyone think it's still worth mentioning? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 03:11, 16 May 2007 (CDT)		I've noticed the number 23 pop up a couple of times. It's pretty significant given the status of the number in general, but does anyone else have any objection in adding it? Off the time of my head, I've only got two examples. Even if this remains the only appearances, anyone think it's still worth mentioning? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 03:11, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
			:Add away! [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 08:10, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Mars: The infamous 23

2007-05-16T08:11:54Z

The infamous 23

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 16 May 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:Nice catch, Ruaraidh. Do add this to this article. Sneaky, these writers. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 01:16, 12 November 2006 (CST)		:Nice catch, Ruaraidh. Do add this to this article. Sneaky, these writers. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 01:16, 12 November 2006 (CST)

			== The infamous 23 ==

			I've noticed the number 23 pop up a couple of times. It's pretty significant given the status of the number in general, but does anyone else have any objection in adding it? Off the time of my head, I've only got two examples. Even if this remains the only appearances, anyone think it's still worth mentioning? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 03:11, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: +reply

2006-11-12T07:16:13Z

+reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 12 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)		*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)

			:Nice catch, Ruaraidh. Do add this to this article. Sneaky, these writers. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 01:16, 12 November 2006 (CST)

Ruaraidh: 893893

2006-11-11T19:27:48Z

893893

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 11 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

			*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)

April Arcus at 23:42, 13 February 2006

2006-02-13T23:42:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 13 February 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
			:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

Karoshi: Zarek's "40"

2006-02-13T22:39:39Z

Zarek's "40"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 13 February 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)		Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
			::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: A 40-pt. moose once bit my sister...

2006-02-13T20:47:35Z

A 40-pt. moose once bit my sister...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 13 February 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)		Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)
			:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 20:35, 13 February 2006

2006-02-13T20:35:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 13 February 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)		::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)

			Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)

MASON at 05:38, 18 October 2005

2005-10-18T05:38:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 18 October 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)		:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

			::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher\|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)		::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher\|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

	:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)		:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages\|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad\|wrong]]. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

	::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)		::::I feel somehow responsible for this one, actually, after starting a thread at Gateworld about this very [http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=19005 idea]. Although I like the concept, until there's canonical evidence to support it, I think it is best kept to the forums. --[[User:MASON\|MASON]] 01:38:07, 2005-10-18 (EDT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

	*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)		*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 11 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

			*Maybe you guys already know this, but 893893/7 = 127699, 127699/11 = 11609, 11609/13 = 893, 893/19 = '''47'''. The divisors are all primes, but not in sequence. I can't see any other pattern at a glance. [[User:Ruaraidh\|Ruaraidh]] 13:27, 11 November 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 13 February 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)		::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)
			:::For the most part, they don't. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 18:42, 13 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 13 February 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)		Um, how is Zarek's prisoner number adding up to 40 significant?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (EST)
	:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)		:I don't have a frakking clue. I was asked to move it, so it's done. Since it's now on a silly page, maybe somebody can figure it out, sources be damned. Silly pages have wide latitude on their content since its, uh, ''silly''. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:47, 13 February 2006 (EST)
			::Why it is under "40" and not "893893"? Maybe I don't understand how a ''silly'' page works! --[[User:Karoshi\|Karoshi]] 17:39, 13 February 2006 (EST)