Talk:New Caprica/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:14Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:How would we do that? We don't know how many Cylons added to the total population, but I am assuming you are interested in the human population. How would we get that? Is it just subtract 33 (police cadets killed in suicide bombing) minus 4 (humans killed in power plant bombing) minus 200 (suspected insurgents). Well, strike that, we don't know how many of the suspects were killed by the Cylons at the end of Occuprice. So are we just doing 37 minus the population as of the end of LDBY, or shall we wait? Just wondering. --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:03, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:How would we do that? We don't know how many Cylons added to the total population, but I am assuming you are interested in the human population. How would we get that? Is it just subtract 33 (police cadets killed in suicide bombing) minus 4 (humans killed in power plant bombing) minus 200 (suspected insurgents). Well, strike that, we don't know how many of the suspects were killed by the Cylons at the end of Occuprice. So are we just doing 37 minus the population as of the end of LDBY, or shall we wait? Just wondering. --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:03, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	:Have we been given any further information? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:04, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:Have we been given any further information? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:04, 8 October 2006 (CDT)

	::Well, I forgot the two suicide bombers themselves, so that's 2 plus 37, 39. LDBY population - 39, AS OF FAR. Other than that, the casualty rates of the 200 suspects will be unresolved until next Friday, so no other information except 39 solid human deaths, plus ''perhaps'' one of a guy undergoing torture at the beginning of the episode (I could hear some screams when the Cavil entered Tigh's cell). --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:08, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		::Well, I forgot the two suicide bombers themselves, so that's 2 plus 37, 39. LDBY population - 39, AS OF FAR. Other than that, the casualty rates of the 200 suspects will be unresolved until next Friday, so no other information except 39 solid human deaths, plus ''perhaps'' one of a guy undergoing torture at the beginning of the episode (I could hear some screams when the Cavil entered Tigh's cell). --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:08, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::It's not worth the bother, IMO. When we were getting regular population updates during the 2nd season it was fun to add up the totals and see how close we could get, but without regular confirmation, it seems like a futile exercise. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:12, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:::It's not worth the bother, IMO. When we were getting regular population updates during the 2nd season it was fun to add up the totals and see how close we could get, but without regular confirmation, it seems like a futile exercise. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:12, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	::We never counted known Cylons as part of the surviving population. So any Cylons added to the population (such as the duplicates of already-known Cylon models) would not affect those numbers. As for the futility of such an exercise... I do agree that errors are much more likely to occur now that there is no longer any on-screen count. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:21, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		::We never counted known Cylons as part of the surviving population. So any Cylons added to the population (such as the duplicates of already-known Cylon models) would not affect those numbers. As for the futility of such an exercise... I do agree that errors are much more likely to occur now that there is no longer any on-screen count. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:21, 8 October 2006 (CDT)

Davidkevin: Anyone Left Behind?

2009-03-08T07:13:14Z

Anyone Left Behind?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 8 March 2009
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Is there are a special reason why the whole page is written in the past tense? Usually I'd edit it, but by now someone else should have noticed that as well. So maybe it's supposed to be that way... --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:10, 29 October 2006 (CST)		Is there are a special reason why the whole page is written in the past tense? Usually I'd edit it, but by now someone else should have noticed that as well. So maybe it's supposed to be that way... --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:10, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	: Perhaps it was noted, but maybe no one brought the issue up. Though I do fully agree that the tense needs to be changed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:16, 29 October 2006 (CST)		: Perhaps it was noted, but maybe no one brought the issue up. Though I do fully agree that the tense needs to be changed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:16, 29 October 2006 (CST)

			== Anyone Left Behind? ==

			Were there other Humans besides Baltar who failed to escape in the exodus from New Caprica? Since the Cylons abandoned the planet after the exodus, could there have been a handful of Humans still left to try to bleakly survive who neither escaped or were exterminated? -- [[User:Davidkevin\|Davidkevin]] 07:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* tense problem */ reply

2006-10-29T20:16:06Z

tense problem: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 29 October 2006
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Is there are a special reason why the whole page is written in the past tense? Usually I'd edit it, but by now someone else should have noticed that as well. So maybe it's supposed to be that way... --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:10, 29 October 2006 (CST)		Is there are a special reason why the whole page is written in the past tense? Usually I'd edit it, but by now someone else should have noticed that as well. So maybe it's supposed to be that way... --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:10, 29 October 2006 (CST)
			: Perhaps it was noted, but maybe no one brought the issue up. Though I do fully agree that the tense needs to be changed. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:16, 29 October 2006 (CST)

Serenity: whole article in past tense

2006-10-29T11:10:48Z

whole article in past tense

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 29 October 2006
Line 42:		Line 42:
	When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	:Doral said they were over a light year away, so they probably just detected the radiation a little bit before occupation. It would take the radiation that long to move out that far. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 19:50, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		:Doral said they were over a light year away, so they probably just detected the radiation a little bit before occupation. It would take the radiation that long to move out that far. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 19:50, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

			== tense problem ==

			Is there are a special reason why the whole page is written in the past tense? Usually I'd edit it, but by now someone else should have noticed that as well. So maybe it's supposed to be that way... --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:10, 29 October 2006 (CST)

Talos: /* Cylon Discovery */

2006-10-23T00:50:57Z

Cylon Discovery

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 23 October 2006
Line 41:		Line 41:

	When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			:Doral said they were over a light year away, so they probably just detected the radiation a little bit before occupation. It would take the radiation that long to move out that far. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 19:50, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Sauron18: /* Ressurection */

2006-10-23T00:14:53Z

Ressurection

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 23 October 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:

	If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			:Because more than 1 does not mean many. BT stressed "one of their few Resurrection Ships". They've got more than 1, but probably just about 3 in total. And at least one other Resurrection Ship was occupied with safeguarding the Colonies. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 19:14, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

	==Cylon Discovery==		==Cylon Discovery==

	When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Commander Mazien at 23:59, 22 October 2006

2006-10-22T23:59:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 22 October 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:

	If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

			==Cylon Discovery==

			When Gina left the Nuclear signature that the Cylons discovered, did the Cylons discover it at the moment of detonation or mere days before the occupation? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Commander Mazien: /* Ressurection */

2006-10-22T23:53:49Z

Ressurection

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 22 October 2006
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

			If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Sauron18: /* Ressurection */

2006-10-22T20:54:37Z

Ressurection

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 22 October 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Madbrood: /* Ressurection */

2006-10-22T20:48:14Z

Ressurection

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 22 October 2006
Line 32:		Line 32:
	: I think there might be a resurrection plant (for lack of a better term) on New Caprica, like there was on Caprica where Caprica Six and Boomer were resurrected. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		: I think there might be a resurrection plant (for lack of a better term) on New Caprica, like there was on Caprica where Caprica Six and Boomer were resurrected. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:How would we do that? We don't know how many Cylons added to the total population, but I am assuming you are interested in the human population. How would we get that? Is it just subtract 33 (police cadets killed in suicide bombing) minus 4 (humans killed in power plant bombing) minus 200 (suspected insurgents). Well, strike that, we don't know how many of the suspects were killed by the Cylons at the end of Occuprice. So are we just doing 37 minus the population as of the end of LDBY, or shall we wait? Just wondering. --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:03, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:How would we do that? We don't know how many Cylons added to the total population, but I am assuming you are interested in the human population. How would we get that? Is it just subtract 33 (police cadets killed in suicide bombing) minus 4 (humans killed in power plant bombing) minus 200 (suspected insurgents). Well, strike that, we don't know how many of the suspects were killed by the Cylons at the end of Occuprice. So are we just doing 37 minus the population as of the end of LDBY, or shall we wait? Just wondering. --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:03, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	:Have we been given any further information? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:04, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:Have we been given any further information? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:04, 8 October 2006 (CDT)

	::Well, I forgot the two suicide bombers themselves, so that's 2 plus 37, 39. LDBY population - 39, AS OF FAR. Other than that, the casualty rates of the 200 suspects will be unresolved until next Friday, so no other information except 39 solid human deaths, plus ''perhaps'' one of a guy undergoing torture at the beginning of the episode (I could hear some screams when the Cavil entered Tigh's cell). --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:08, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		::Well, I forgot the two suicide bombers themselves, so that's 2 plus 37, 39. LDBY population - 39, AS OF FAR. Other than that, the casualty rates of the 200 suspects will be unresolved until next Friday, so no other information except 39 solid human deaths, plus ''perhaps'' one of a guy undergoing torture at the beginning of the episode (I could hear some screams when the Cavil entered Tigh's cell). --[[User:Homeworld\|Homeworld]] 16:08, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::It's not worth the bother, IMO. When we were getting regular population updates during the 2nd season it was fun to add up the totals and see how close we could get, but without regular confirmation, it seems like a futile exercise. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:12, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		:::It's not worth the bother, IMO. When we were getting regular population updates during the 2nd season it was fun to add up the totals and see how close we could get, but without regular confirmation, it seems like a futile exercise. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:12, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
	::We never counted known Cylons as part of the surviving population. So any Cylons added to the population (such as the duplicates of already-known Cylon models) would not affect those numbers. As for the futility of such an exercise... I do agree that errors are much more likely to occur now that there is no longer any on-screen count. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:21, 8 October 2006 (CDT)		::We never counted known Cylons as part of the surviving population. So any Cylons added to the population (such as the duplicates of already-known Cylon models) would not affect those numbers. As for the futility of such an exercise... I do agree that errors are much more likely to occur now that there is no longer any on-screen count. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 16:21, 8 October 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 22 October 2006
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

			If there were more Ressurection Ships, why didn't the Cylons just move another one close to The Fleet and continue to attack ''en masse''? [[User:Commander Mazien\|Commander Mazien]] 18:53, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 22 October 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			::::Well, We always knew that there were only two choices for where they resurrected: a Ship, or a Facility on the Colonies. We know Caprica was reborn on a ship because of the timeframe, so only Boomer was left ambiguous. However, Grace Park recently confirmed that Boomer was reborn in a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:54, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 22 October 2006
Line 32:		Line 32:
	: I think there might be a resurrection plant (for lack of a better term) on New Caprica, like there was on Caprica where Caprica Six and Boomer were resurrected. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		: I think there might be a resurrection plant (for lack of a better term) on New Caprica, like there was on Caprica where Caprica Six and Boomer were resurrected. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 14:59, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
	::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)		::Actually, Caprica, and it seems Boomer too, were resurrected on a ship. --[[User:Sauron18\|Sauron18]] 15:11, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
			:::When was ''that'' established? --[[User:Madbrood\|Madbrood]] 15:48, 22 October 2006 (CDT)