Talk:Miniseries, Night 2/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* "Night"? */ reply

2009-11-11T23:46:18Z

"Night"?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 11 November 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	::::Still, it's an odd title. It isn't even a title. On the other hand, the original series pilot isnt't titled "Saga Of A Star World, pre Camp Davis breaking news" and "Saga Of A Star World, post Camp Davis breaking news" (or "Saga Of A Star World, Parts I through III" since it was split after its first airing). Why does the article have to be split at all? Since it is one entity, why not merge the articles and simply mention that it was split for airing?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 23:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		::::Still, it's an odd title. It isn't even a title. On the other hand, the original series pilot isnt't titled "Saga Of A Star World, pre Camp Davis breaking news" and "Saga Of A Star World, post Camp Davis breaking news" (or "Saga Of A Star World, Parts I through III" since it was split after its first airing). Why does the article have to be split at all? Since it is one entity, why not merge the articles and simply mention that it was split for airing?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 23:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			:::::The article was split for browser/MediaWiki performance issues, not to mention readability. It is easier to split articles that are overly long, like the Miniseries or SOSW than to merge everything together. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 23:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Dvd-junkie: /* "Night"? */

2009-11-11T23:26:01Z

"Night"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 11 November 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:::The Miniseries is unusual in that it is one complete entity (and has only one production number) split over two nights. This is unlike a two-part episode (like "Kobol's Last Gleaming," for instance) that was treated by the production staff as two different episodes with two different production numbers. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		:::The Miniseries is unusual in that it is one complete entity (and has only one production number) split over two nights. This is unlike a two-part episode (like "Kobol's Last Gleaming," for instance) that was treated by the production staff as two different episodes with two different production numbers. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			::::Still, it's an odd title. It isn't even a title. On the other hand, the original series pilot isnt't titled "Saga Of A Star World, pre Camp Davis breaking news" and "Saga Of A Star World, post Camp Davis breaking news" (or "Saga Of A Star World, Parts I through III" since it was split after its first airing). Why does the article have to be split at all? Since it is one entity, why not merge the articles and simply mention that it was split for airing?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 23:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* "Night"? */ reply

2009-11-11T19:30:14Z

"Night"?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 11 November 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	::Following the usual naming conventions, shouldn't the articles be properly titled "Miniseries, '''Part''' I" and "'''Part''' II"?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 15:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		::Following the usual naming conventions, shouldn't the articles be properly titled "Miniseries, '''Part''' I" and "'''Part''' II"?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 15:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			:::The Miniseries is unusual in that it is one complete entity (and has only one production number) split over two nights. This is unlike a two-part episode (like "Kobol's Last Gleaming," for instance) that was treated by the production staff as two different episodes with two different production numbers. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Dvd-junkie: /* "Night"? */

2009-11-11T15:23:20Z

"Night"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 11 November 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	: Night is not an official part of the title. The "Miniseries" articles are split up between "Night 1" and "Night 2," because the Miniseries originally aired over two nights. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 13:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		: Night is not an official part of the title. The "Miniseries" articles are split up between "Night 1" and "Night 2," because the Miniseries originally aired over two nights. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 13:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			::Following the usual naming conventions, shouldn't the articles be properly titled "Miniseries, '''Part''' I" and "'''Part''' II"?--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 15:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* "Night"? */ reply

2009-11-11T13:25:50Z

"Night"?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 11 November 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Is "Night" supposed to be the miniseries title? Where does it say so? I haven't been able to corroborate this.--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 12:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)		Is "Night" supposed to be the miniseries title? Where does it say so? I haven't been able to corroborate this.--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 12:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

			: Night is not an official part of the title. The "Miniseries" articles are split up between "Night 1" and "Night 2," because the Miniseries originally aired over two nights. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 13:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Dvd-junkie: /* "Night"? */ new section

2009-11-11T12:21:36Z

"Night"?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 11 November 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
	:::Yeah, I don't know why that's such a big question. It has to be Baltar. He got the info from Six and said that he's on noone's side. So while he doesn't openly support mankind, leaving a note is in his own interest. Sure, it's not openly said, but rather obvious. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:57, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		:::Yeah, I don't know why that's such a big question. It has to be Baltar. He got the info from Six and said that he's on noone's side. So while he doesn't openly support mankind, leaving a note is in his own interest. Sure, it's not openly said, but rather obvious. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:57, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

			== "Night"? ==

			Is "Night" supposed to be the miniseries title? Where does it say so? I haven't been able to corroborate this.--[[User:Dvd-junkie\|Dvd-junkie]] 12:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Serenity: /* "12 Models" note */

2007-10-22T15:57:09Z

"12 Models" note

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 22 October 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
	::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
			:::Yeah, I don't know why that's such a big question. It has to be Baltar. He got the info from Six and said that he's on noone's side. So while he doesn't openly support mankind, leaving a note is in his own interest. Sure, it's not openly said, but rather obvious. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:57, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

Mercifull: /* "12 Models" note */

2007-10-22T13:11:46Z

"12 Models" note

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 22 October 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
	: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
			::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* "12 Models" note */ reply

2007-10-22T13:01:29Z

"12 Models" note: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 22 October 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
			: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

Rapturous: New section: "12 Models" note

2007-10-22T12:53:57Z

New section: "12 Models" note

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 22 October 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I recently moved a few names in the cast section based on the opening credits. But then I took noticed of the closing credits and noticed that this is where the original order came from. I'm not reverting because I'm still not sure which is right (or rather, less wrong). However, I'd assume that the opening credits, per most films, would consist of the stars, which makes my edit the best option. But of course, there are other forces working, so what's the concensus? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 22:03, 19 December 2006 (CST)		I recently moved a few names in the cast section based on the opening credits. But then I took noticed of the closing credits and noticed that this is where the original order came from. I'm not reverting because I'm still not sure which is right (or rather, less wrong). However, I'd assume that the opening credits, per most films, would consist of the stars, which makes my edit the best option. But of course, there are other forces working, so what's the concensus? --[[User:Mars\|Mars]] 22:03, 19 December 2006 (CST)

			== "12 Models" note ==

			Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 22 October 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
	::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
			:::Yeah, I don't know why that's such a big question. It has to be Baltar. He got the info from Six and said that he's on noone's side. So while he doesn't openly support mankind, leaving a note is in his own interest. Sure, it's not openly said, but rather obvious. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:57, 22 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 22 October 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		Do we know (or have any theories) as to who placed the note saying there are only 12 cylon models in Adama's quarters? --[[User:Rapturous\|Rapturous]] 07:53, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
	: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)		: RDM re-indicated recently that he believes that it was Baltar who left the note, which makes sense seeing as Six told him that there were twelve models. I don't have a link on me, but a google search should turn something up.-- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:01, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
			::I always thought it was pretty obvious that is was Baltar after being told by Six. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 08:11, 22 October 2007 (CDT)