Talk:Micron/Archive 1 - Revision history

Serenity: Talk:Micron (TOS) moved to Talk:Micron

2007-08-13T23:47:06Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:47, 13 August 2007
(No difference)

PrePressChris: + reply

2006-10-20T19:56:48Z

+ reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 20 October 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)		:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

			::True, but if one micron is one second, then a centon is a bit over a minute and a half, a centar is two and a half hours, etc. Do we know that any one of those units were defined to be exact equivalents? I thought that they were only roughly analagous. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 14:56, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

Serenity at 19:33, 20 October 2006

2006-10-20T19:33:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 20 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT)		Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

			:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

PrePressChris: + question about accuracy

2006-10-20T19:23:56Z

+ question about accuracy

New page

Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT)