Talk:Kronus/Archive 1 - Revision history

Steelviper: /* Cleanup */ concur

2007-01-11T17:35:55Z

Cleanup: concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 11 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST)		On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST)
			:Concur. Removing. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:35, 11 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity: Although...

2007-01-11T17:30:05Z

Although...

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 11 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
	Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)		Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)

			On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: I agree, Serenity; removing the tag

2007-01-11T17:24:34Z

I agree, Serenity; removing the tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 11 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)		Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)
	:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
			Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity at 17:20, 11 January 2007

2007-01-11T17:20:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 11 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Cleanup==		==Cleanup==
	Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)		Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)
			:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: Noted cleanup/revision tag, need ideas on cleanup

2007-01-11T17:17:06Z

Noted cleanup/revision tag, need ideas on cleanup

New page

==Cleanup==
Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 11 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
	Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)		Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)

			On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST)