Talk:Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Analysis error */ reply

2011-06-28T16:14:17Z

Analysis error: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 28 June 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)		Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

			: Good catch. We'll nuke it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:14, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Dogger55: /* Analysis error */

2011-06-28T15:18:12Z

Analysis error

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 28 June 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Analysis error ==		== Analysis error ==

	The "Analysis" section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."		The [[Kobol%27s_Last_Gleaming,_Part_I#Analysis\|Analysis]] section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."

	Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)		Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Dogger55: /* Analysis error */

2011-06-28T15:11:13Z

Analysis error

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 28 June 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Analysis error ==		== Analysis error ==

	The Analysis section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."		The "Analysis" section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."

	Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)		Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Dogger55: /* Analysis error */

2011-06-28T15:01:34Z

Analysis error

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 28 June 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	The Analysis section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."		The Analysis section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."

	Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot.[[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)		Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot. [[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Dogger55: /* Analysis error */ new section

2011-06-28T15:01:10Z

Analysis error: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 28 June 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:

	: Checkout the [[Timeline (RDM)\|timeline article]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 22:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)		: Checkout the [[Timeline (RDM)\|timeline article]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 22:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

			== Analysis error ==

			The Analysis section poses this question: "Kobol appears to be a lush, habitable world. Even with the danger of Cylon attack, it's surprising that no one raises the question of resettling here, although at this early stage the reasonable presumption is that the Cylons would simply have invaded or bombed the planet, wiping out the remainder of humanity."

			Cmdr. Adama does raise the possibility of a permanent settlement, during the meeting with Roslin, Baltar and others, saying that they should give the matter "serious consideration". Obviously, the encounter with the Cylon basestar during the subsequent survey mission renders the question moot.[[User:Dogger55\|Dogger55]] 11:01, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Timeline */ reply

2010-08-18T22:50:04Z

Timeline: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 18 August 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	--[[User:Antred\|Antred]] 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Antred\|Antred]] 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

			: Checkout the [[Timeline (RDM)\|timeline article]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 22:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Antred: /* Timeline */ new section

2010-08-18T22:22:40Z

Timeline: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 18 August 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The title appears to be a reference to the national anthem of the United States of America (''what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming''). But there was also a film called Twilight's Last Gleaming that could be the real reference. Does anyone know? --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)		The title appears to be a reference to the national anthem of the United States of America (''what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming''). But there was also a film called Twilight's Last Gleaming that could be the real reference. Does anyone know? --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
	:See http://www.filmref.com/journal/archives/2007/02/twilights_last_gleaming_1977.html BTW, I'm tickled pink by the titles they give these re-imagined BSG episodes. Very literary. --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)		:See http://www.filmref.com/journal/archives/2007/02/twilights_last_gleaming_1977.html BTW, I'm tickled pink by the titles they give these re-imagined BSG episodes. Very literary. --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Timeline ==

			Does anyone know how many days / weeks into the exodus the events in this episode take place?

			--[[User:Antred\|Antred]] 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Tuzaa: /* Title */

2008-05-12T06:08:03Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 12 May 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	The title appears to be a reference to the national anthem of the United States of America (''what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming''). But there was also a film called Twilight's Last Gleaming that could be the real reference. Does anyone know? --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)		The title appears to be a reference to the national anthem of the United States of America (''what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming''). But there was also a film called Twilight's Last Gleaming that could be the real reference. Does anyone know? --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
			:See http://www.filmref.com/journal/archives/2007/02/twilights_last_gleaming_1977.html BTW, I'm tickled pink by the titles they give these re-imagined BSG episodes. Very literary. --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Tuzaa: /* Title */ new section

2008-05-12T06:03:19Z

Title: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 12 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{newsection link}}		{{newsection link}}

			== Title ==

			The title appears to be a reference to the national anthem of the United States of America (''what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming''). But there was also a film called Twilight's Last Gleaming that could be the real reference. Does anyone know? --[[User:Tuzaa\|Tuzaa]] 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: + newsection link

2008-02-29T01:47:36Z

+ newsection link

New page