Talk:Klick/Archive 1 - Revision history

Steelviper: /* Delete Candidate */ of->on

2006-01-05T16:09:25Z

Delete Candidate: of->on

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 5 January 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)		This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)

	:It'd have more to stand of if it was linked to. As it stands, it's pretty much an orphan (in addition to being an article explaining the obvious). It should probably go the way of military saluting (the page, not the hand salute). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:08, 5 January 2006 (EST)		:It'd have more to stand on if it was linked to. As it stands, it's pretty much an orphan (in addition to being an article explaining the obvious). It should probably go the way of military saluting (the page, not the hand salute). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:08, 5 January 2006 (EST)

Steelviper: agree

2006-01-05T16:08:56Z

agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 5 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)		This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)

			:It'd have more to stand of if it was linked to. As it stands, it's pretty much an orphan (in addition to being an article explaining the obvious). It should probably go the way of military saluting (the page, not the hand salute). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:08, 5 January 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: Delete Candidate

2006-01-05T15:55:44Z

Delete Candidate

New page

== Delete Candidate ==

This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)