Talk:Humanoid Cylon speculation/Archive4 - Revision history

ArchiveBot: Archiving 8 thread(s) (older than 60d) to Talk:Humanoid Cylon speculation/Archive3.

2009-11-02T16:53:26Z

Archiving 8 thread(s) (older than 60d) to Talk:Humanoid Cylon speculation/Archive3.

ZeldaTheSwordsman at 20:38, 29 January 2009

2009-01-29T20:38:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 29 January 2009
Line 153:		Line 153:
	:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
	::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)		::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
			***Ellen was on a LOT of shortlists. Her mysterious survival, and then Saul being a Cylon... [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 20:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Spencerian: /* Archiving rather than deleting */ -comment

2009-01-22T03:27:25Z

Archiving rather than deleting: -comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 22 January 2009
Line 151:		Line 151:

	I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
	Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
			::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 15:08, 20 January 2009

2009-01-20T15:08:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 20 January 2009
Line 146:		Line 146:
	Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
	: Not yet you don't. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		: Not yet you don't. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
			:: Since the Final Five are actually older, Seven must have been a failed model. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 15:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

	== Archiving rather than deleting ==		== Archiving rather than deleting ==

Bradtem: /* Archiving rather than deleting */

2009-01-20T09:07:02Z

Archiving rather than deleting

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 20 January 2009
Line 150:		Line 150:

	I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
			Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Spencerian: /* Archiving rather than deleting */ new section

2009-01-20T03:26:19Z

Archiving rather than deleting: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 20 January 2009
Line 146:		Line 146:
	Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
	: Not yet you don't. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		: Not yet you don't. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Archiving rather than deleting ==

			I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Another, broader reboot */ reply

2009-01-16T03:00:13Z

Another, broader reboot: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 16 January 2009
Line 107:		Line 107:

	So are we just going to leave this old article up and have people keep updating it, or go with my reboot or one of the other reboots? Soon it will have been a waste of effort...--[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 02:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)		So are we just going to leave this old article up and have people keep updating it, or go with my reboot or one of the other reboots? Soon it will have been a waste of effort...--[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 02:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

			: It sadly already is. My earlier recommendation for an "in-universe" perspective still stands. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 03:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

	==Starbuck As A Cylon==		==Starbuck As A Cylon==

Bradtem: /* Another, broader reboot */ when?

2009-01-16T02:48:47Z

Another, broader reboot: when?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 16 January 2009
Line 105:		Line 105:
	::Yeah, the basics look good, but it still needs some tweaking here and there to fine-tune sentences, points, cites and such. And please, can we stop giving so much credence to Leoben's lie in "Flesh and Bone". At least it should be mentioned that it's most likely just BS instead of some "clue". -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)		::Yeah, the basics look good, but it still needs some tweaking here and there to fine-tune sentences, points, cites and such. And please, can we stop giving so much credence to Leoben's lie in "Flesh and Bone". At least it should be mentioned that it's most likely just BS instead of some "clue". -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::Oh, absolutely. Could use more cites and some cleanup here and there. However, I do rather think the more obvious false clue should be mentioned "Adama is a Cylon", since it does lead to in-universe speculation—and rather humorously dark moments between Roslin and Adama in "Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 17:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)		:::Oh, absolutely. Could use more cites and some cleanup here and there. However, I do rather think the more obvious false clue should be mentioned "Adama is a Cylon", since it does lead to in-universe speculation—and rather humorously dark moments between Roslin and Adama in "Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 17:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

			So are we just going to leave this old article up and have people keep updating it, or go with my reboot or one of the other reboots? Soon it will have been a waste of effort...--[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 02:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

	==Starbuck As A Cylon==		==Starbuck As A Cylon==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* What about Number Seven? */ reply

2009-01-15T19:32:26Z

What about Number Seven?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 15 January 2009
Line 141:		Line 141:

	Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
			: Not yet you don't. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 19:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Gordon Ecker: /* What about Number Seven? */

2009-01-15T03:12:07Z

What about Number Seven?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 15 January 2009
Line 140:		Line 140:
	== What about Number Seven? ==		== What about Number Seven? ==

	~~What do~~ we ~~know~~ about Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)		Do we have any information about the existence or nonexistence of Number Seven? In many interviews and articles, it has been stated that the Final Five don't have model numbers, so it couldn't be any of them. Has the issue of Number Seven been addressed in any interviews? -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 29 January 2009
Line 153:		Line 153:
	:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
	::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)		::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
			***Ellen was on a LOT of shortlists. Her mysterious survival, and then Saul being a Cylon... [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 20:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 22 January 2009
Line 151:		Line 151:

	I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		I can't say I'll miss all the fanwanking we did on this page and its sisters, but I think it'll be a hoot to leave these pages as of Ellen Tigh's reveal, locked with a note about the relative history of how contributors jerked themselves around trying to formulate a logic for the last Cylons. The main articles would be protected as well as the talk pages for people to smile and laugh at (especially the producers and writers who probably made ''sure'' we were wrong! ;) Thoughts? --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
	Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)		:Sure, archive it. Though I will point out that if you read the [[Humanoid Cylon speculation/ColdBoot]] replacement that I started for it 6 months ago, it would in fact have led the reader to probably pick Ellen. Not sure why my efforts to get it live never amounted to anyting, but "nyah, nyah, I told you so..." :-) So archive that too. --[[User:Bradtem\|bradtem]] 09:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
			::I'd say you'd get dibs on that prediction, Brad. :) --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)