Talk:Gemenon Liner 1701/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:44Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	== Merge Note ==		== Merge Note ==
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	==Identity==		==Identity==
	I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: /* Citation */

2006-05-09T21:03:35Z

Citation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 9 May 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

			::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	== Merge Note ==		== Merge Note ==

April Arcus at 20:58, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T20:58:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 9 May 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Identity==		==Identity==
	I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

			:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 20:57, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T20:57:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 9 May 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

			==Identity==
			I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: /* Merge Note */

2006-05-09T20:47:55Z

Merge Note

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 9 May 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

			:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: Merge Note

2006-05-09T17:43:31Z

Merge Note

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 9 May 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

			== Merge Note ==

			Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian at 17:42, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T17:42:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 9 May 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]]		Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]]

			:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Noneofyourbusiness at 16:50, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T16:50:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 9 May 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)		:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)

	Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]]		Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]]

Noneofyourbusiness at 16:49, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T16:49:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 9 May 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)		:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)

			Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]]

The Merovingian at 19:42, 2 February 2006

2006-02-02T19:42:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 2 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Citation ==		== Citation ==
	There's no citation for the main article. Does this happen in the mini-series? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:44, 2 February 2006 (EST)		There's no citation for the main article. Does this happen in the mini-series? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:44, 2 February 2006 (EST)

			:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	== Merge Note ==		== Merge Note ==
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	==Identity==		==Identity==
	I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

	:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)