Talk:Galactica Museum/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

2025-06-24T20:16:18Z

Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 24 June 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[~~Image~~:Bsgmuseumlight4xn.jpg\|thumb\|Battlestar Galactica Museum]]		[[File:Bsgmuseumlight4xn.jpg\|thumb\|Battlestar Galactica Museum]]

	==Notes==		==Notes==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:44Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I referred to the TOS Viper in the museum as a Mk. I. This is only because I couldn't think of anything else to call it and it fit perfectly. You can see it on the left in the contrast-adjusted picture here --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 20:04, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		I referred to the TOS Viper in the museum as a Mk. I. This is only because I couldn't think of anything else to call it and it fit perfectly. You can see it on the left in the contrast-adjusted picture here --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 20:04, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

	:The video game, of dubious canonicity, seems to support that designation. Do you think this should have a redirect from Starboard Flight Pod? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:14, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:The video game, of dubious canonicity, seems to support that designation. Do you think this should have a redirect from Starboard Flight Pod? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:14, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

	:Is it explicitly stated that Galactica only had a single squadron of Vipers still on duty? We see a full squadron destroyed in the first sortie of the miniseries, after which Galactica apparently can still field two squadrons of mixed Mk. II and Mk. VII fighters in the last combat sequence. This would make a certain amount of sense - presumably a normal battlestar has four squadrons, two in each flight pod. With the starboard pod hosting a museum, there would have been two Mk. VII squadrons in the port flight pod. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:19, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:Is it explicitly stated that Galactica only had a single squadron of Vipers still on duty? We see a full squadron destroyed in the first sortie of the miniseries, after which Galactica apparently can still field two squadrons of mixed Mk. II and Mk. VII fighters in the last combat sequence. This would make a certain amount of sense - presumably a normal battlestar has four squadrons, two in each flight pod. With the starboard pod hosting a museum, there would have been two Mk. VII squadrons in the port flight pod. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:19, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

	:: Emphasis is "on duty"; they were out of Vipers until Commander Adama told them to refit the old Mark II's from the Museum. They may not have had any Viper Mark VII's left at that point on board; there were 40 Mark II's. ---Ricimer, 19 Sept, 2005		:: Emphasis is "on duty"; they were out of Vipers until Commander Adama told them to refit the old Mark II's from the Museum. They may not have had any Viper Mark VII's left at that point on board; there were 40 Mark II's. ---Ricimer, 19 Sept, 2005

	:::There were clearly several Mk. VIIs visible in that battle, and throughout the series thus far. I don't know how many Mk. IIs there were, but Adama said there was a "full squadron", which appears to mean 20 ships. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:47, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:::There were clearly several Mk. VIIs visible in that battle, and throughout the series thus far. I don't know how many Mk. IIs there were, but Adama said there was a "full squadron", which appears to mean 20 ships. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:47, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

	== Usage ==		== Usage ==

Quig: /* Early Generation Battlestar? */

2009-05-05T19:14:20Z

Early Generation Battlestar?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 5 May 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Early Generation Battlestar? ==		== Early Generation Battlestar? ==

	In looking at the photo from the episode "Daybreak Pt. 2" if you look behind the old style cylon basestar there is a section of a TOS era battlestar. Could in be possible it is a earlier generation ~~batllestar~~? -- [[User:Quig\|Quig]] 19:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)		In looking at the photo from the episode "Daybreak Pt. 2" if you look behind the old style cylon basestar there is a section of a TOS era battlestar. Could in be possible it is a earlier generation battlestar? -- [[User:Quig\|Quig]] 19:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Quig: Question about a possibility of an early battlestar/

2009-05-05T19:13:21Z

Question about a possibility of an early battlestar/

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 5 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	It could have just been me, but I swore there were Vipers launching out of the flight pod during the freefall to New Caprica. Did it seem that way to anyone else or am I just assuming? --[[User:Kevin W.\|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.\|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 14:24, 10 December 2007 (CST)		It could have just been me, but I swore there were Vipers launching out of the flight pod during the freefall to New Caprica. Did it seem that way to anyone else or am I just assuming? --[[User:Kevin W.\|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.\|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 14:24, 10 December 2007 (CST)
	:The view of the flight pod is so close that you can't actually see which side it is. It might seem that way from the camera perspective, yes, but it could be either side of the ship. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:39, 10 December 2007 (CST)		:The view of the flight pod is so close that you can't actually see which side it is. It might seem that way from the camera perspective, yes, but it could be either side of the ship. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:39, 10 December 2007 (CST)

			== Early Generation Battlestar? ==

			In looking at the photo from the episode "Daybreak Pt. 2" if you look behind the old style cylon basestar there is a section of a TOS era battlestar. Could in be possible it is a earlier generation batllestar? -- [[User:Quig\|Quig]] 19:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Serenity: /* Usage */ Just seems that way

2007-12-10T20:39:46Z

Usage: Just seems that way

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 10 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:

	It could have just been me, but I swore there were Vipers launching out of the flight pod during the freefall to New Caprica. Did it seem that way to anyone else or am I just assuming? --[[User:Kevin W.\|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.\|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 14:24, 10 December 2007 (CST)		It could have just been me, but I swore there were Vipers launching out of the flight pod during the freefall to New Caprica. Did it seem that way to anyone else or am I just assuming? --[[User:Kevin W.\|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.\|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 14:24, 10 December 2007 (CST)
			:The view of the flight pod is so close that you can't actually see which side it is. It might seem that way from the camera perspective, yes, but it could be either side of the ship. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:39, 10 December 2007 (CST)

Kevin W.: New section: Usage

2007-12-10T20:24:25Z

New section: Usage

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 10 December 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:::There were clearly several Mk. VIIs visible in that battle, and throughout the series thus far. I don't know how many Mk. IIs there were, but Adama said there was a "full squadron", which appears to mean 20 ships. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:47, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:::There were clearly several Mk. VIIs visible in that battle, and throughout the series thus far. I don't know how many Mk. IIs there were, but Adama said there was a "full squadron", which appears to mean 20 ships. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:47, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

			== Usage ==

			It could have just been me, but I swore there were Vipers launching out of the flight pod during the freefall to New Caprica. Did it seem that way to anyone else or am I just assuming? --[[User:Kevin W.\|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.\|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 14:24, 10 December 2007 (CST)

April Arcus: /* Notes */

2005-09-20T00:47:56Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 20 September 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:: Emphasis is "on duty"; they were out of Vipers until Commander Adama told them to refit the old Mark II's from the Museum. They may not have had any Viper Mark VII's left at that point on board; there were 40 Mark II's. ---Ricimer, 19 Sept, 2005		:: Emphasis is "on duty"; they were out of Vipers until Commander Adama told them to refit the old Mark II's from the Museum. They may not have had any Viper Mark VII's left at that point on board; there were 40 Mark II's. ---Ricimer, 19 Sept, 2005

			:::There were clearly several Mk. VIIs visible in that battle, and throughout the series thus far. I don't know how many Mk. IIs there were, but Adama said there was a "full squadron", which appears to mean 20 ships. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:47, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

The Merovingian at 00:28, 20 September 2005

2005-09-20T00:28:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 20 September 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Is it explicitly stated that Galactica only had a single squadron of Vipers still on duty? We see a full squadron destroyed in the first sortie of the miniseries, after which Galactica apparently can still field two squadrons of mixed Mk. II and Mk. VII fighters in the last combat sequence. This would make a certain amount of sense - presumably a normal battlestar has four squadrons, two in each flight pod. With the starboard pod hosting a museum, there would have been two Mk. VII squadrons in the port flight pod. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:19, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:Is it explicitly stated that Galactica only had a single squadron of Vipers still on duty? We see a full squadron destroyed in the first sortie of the miniseries, after which Galactica apparently can still field two squadrons of mixed Mk. II and Mk. VII fighters in the last combat sequence. This would make a certain amount of sense - presumably a normal battlestar has four squadrons, two in each flight pod. With the starboard pod hosting a museum, there would have been two Mk. VII squadrons in the port flight pod. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:19, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

			:: Emphasis is "on duty"; they were out of Vipers until Commander Adama told them to refit the old Mark II's from the Museum. They may not have had any Viper Mark VII's left at that point on board; there were 40 Mark II's. ---Ricimer, 19 Sept, 2005

April Arcus at 00:19, 20 September 2005

2005-09-20T00:19:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 20 September 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:The video game, of dubious canonicity, seems to support that designation. Do you think this should have a redirect from Starboard Flight Pod? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:14, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		:The video game, of dubious canonicity, seems to support that designation. Do you think this should have a redirect from Starboard Flight Pod? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:14, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

			:Is it explicitly stated that Galactica only had a single squadron of Vipers still on duty? We see a full squadron destroyed in the first sortie of the miniseries, after which Galactica apparently can still field two squadrons of mixed Mk. II and Mk. VII fighters in the last combat sequence. This would make a certain amount of sense - presumably a normal battlestar has four squadrons, two in each flight pod. With the starboard pod hosting a museum, there would have been two Mk. VII squadrons in the port flight pod. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:19, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

April Arcus at 00:14, 20 September 2005

2005-09-20T00:14:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 20 September 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	I referred to the TOS Viper in the museum as a Mk. I. This is only because I couldn't think of anything else to call it and it fit perfectly. You can see it on the left in the contrast-adjusted picture here --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 20:04, 19 September 2005 (EDT)		I referred to the TOS Viper in the museum as a Mk. I. This is only because I couldn't think of anything else to call it and it fit perfectly. You can see it on the left in the contrast-adjusted picture here --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 20:04, 19 September 2005 (EDT)

			:The video game, of dubious canonicity, seems to support that designation. Do you think this should have a redirect from Starboard Flight Pod? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:14, 19 September 2005 (EDT)