Talk:Galactica Class Battlestar/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:52Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

JosephK19: /* The Galactica Class Battlestar */

2009-06-10T21:58:13Z

The Galactica Class Battlestar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 10 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:: Archive from [http://www.battlestarwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Talk:Galactica_type_battlestar&oldid=47676 April 17, 2006]		:: Archive from [http://www.battlestarwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Talk:Galactica_type_battlestar&oldid=47676 April 17, 2006]

			There is not lots of proof for this line of thinkng. It is not seen many times in the background and at no point is it stated that the galactica is the lead ship of the class. Just because it represents caprica does not make it the lead class. Remember that when the galactica was built the colonies had only just joined togeter, and that was in the face of a new common enemy so they probarbly had only gotten around to creating a single fleet. The image you are using is noncanocal.

			There is as much, if not more evdsnce that the class name is columbia. The Columbia is seen with full armor surgesting that it was built before the war forced the new ship to be hurried along. Don't forget that if this class was created in the cylon war then it was conceved, desined and built in 2 years, this a very quick. This is also probarly not the case as it is servested that the Athena was in survace very early on in the war Thus it can be asumed that Colombia was built before the war. Remember that corners were cut in galactcas construction. [[User:JosephK19\|JosephK19]] 21:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

	== Medical Capabilites of a Battlestar ==		== Medical Capabilites of a Battlestar ==

Philyboy at 13:03, 31 May 2009

2009-05-31T13:03:58Z

Show changes

Philyboy: /* The Galactica Class Batllestar */

2009-05-24T13:43:34Z

The Galactica Class Batllestar

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 24 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== The Galactica Class Batllestar ==		== The Galactica Class Batllestar ==
	There is lots of proof that Galactica and Columbia are both Galactica class battlestars.
			There is lots of proof that Galactica and Columbia are both Galactica class battlestars.
	Although no one ever says this onscreen it is seen many times in the back ground.		Although no one ever says this onscreen it is seen many times in the back ground.
	It would also make sense that the lead ship in the class was named after the class, and since Galactic		It would also make sense that the lead ship in the class was named after the class, and since Galactic

Philyboy: Created page with '== The Galactica Class Batllestar == There is lots of proof that Galactica and Columbia are both Galactica class battlestars. Although no one ever says this onscreen it is se...'

2009-05-24T13:42:59Z

Created page with '== The Galactica Class Batllestar == There is lots of proof that Galactica and Columbia are both Galactica class battlestars. Although no one ever says this onscreen it is se...'

New page

== The Galactica Class Batllestar ==
There is lots of proof that Galactica and Columbia are both Galactica class battlestars.
Although no one ever says this onscreen it is seen many times in the back ground.
It would also make sense that the lead ship in the class was named after the class, and since Galactic
represented Caprica that makes it the lead ship in the class. In this image it clearly shows (Galactica
Class Battlestar) [http://acedmagazine.com/images/stories/battlestargalactica/battlestargalactica23.jpg].
--[[User:Philyboy|P sutherland]] 13:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)