Talk:First Hybrid/Archive 1 - Revision history

Fredmdbud: /* Is the First Hybrid the central computer of the Guardian basestar? */

2008-03-29T07:54:13Z

Is the First Hybrid the central computer of the Guardian basestar?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:54, 29 March 2008
Line 29:		Line 29:
	* It also appears to contradict the statement that other hybrids were created to control the basestars, which implies a change or addition of purpose.		* It also appears to contradict the statement that other hybrids were created to control the basestars, which implies a change or addition of purpose.
	* As for the lack of humanoid Cylons aboard - the mechanical Cylons were intelligent enough to fly Raiders, they could probably pilot and operate a basestar, as seen from the original basestars battling the Colonial Fleet.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)		* As for the lack of humanoid Cylons aboard - the mechanical Cylons were intelligent enough to fly Raiders, they could probably pilot and operate a basestar, as seen from the original basestars battling the Colonial Fleet.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

			:I re-worded the statement into a series of questions, should the matters eventually clear up.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud at 07:42, 29 March 2008

2008-03-29T07:42:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 29 March 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)		::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)
	:::OK, this discussion is getting to in-depth for an article talk page. Perhaps you would like to create a [[Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank]] proposal to take this further? [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 15:42, 5 December 2007 (CST)		:::OK, this discussion is getting to in-depth for an article talk page. Perhaps you would like to create a [[Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank]] proposal to take this further? [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 15:42, 5 December 2007 (CST)

			==Is the First Hybrid the central computer of the Guardian basestar?==

			I removed the statement "''Like the modern Hybrids, the First Hybrid functions as the central computer of its basestar, but it also appears to act as the basestar's command and control, given the absence of modern humanoid Cylons aboard''" because of the following:

			* It is presented as a statement of fact, which I don't believe was affirmatively shown in the episode.
			* It also appears to contradict the statement that other hybrids were created to control the basestars, which implies a change or addition of purpose.
			* As for the lack of humanoid Cylons aboard - the mechanical Cylons were intelligent enough to fly Raiders, they could probably pilot and operate a basestar, as seen from the original basestars battling the Colonial Fleet.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

OTW at 21:42, 5 December 2007

2007-12-05T21:42:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 5 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)		:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)
	::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)		::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)
			:::OK, this discussion is getting to in-depth for an article talk page. Perhaps you would like to create a [[Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank]] proposal to take this further? [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 15:42, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Bradtem: /* Coincidence isn't supportable */

2007-12-05T21:19:10Z

Coincidence isn't supportable

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 5 December 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)		:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)
			::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)

OTW: /* Coincidence isn't supportable */

2007-12-05T13:12:27Z

Coincidence isn't supportable

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 5 December 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Oh yeah, if you are interested in a discussion of the pros and cons of him being the Cylon god, for which this page is not the place, check out http://ideas.4brad.com/cylon-god-and-hybrid --[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 04:14, 5 December 2007 (CST)		Oh yeah, if you are interested in a discussion of the pros and cons of him being the Cylon god, for which this page is not the place, check out http://ideas.4brad.com/cylon-god-and-hybrid --[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 04:14, 5 December 2007 (CST)

			:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Bradtem: /* Coincidence isn't supportable */

2007-12-05T10:14:12Z

Coincidence isn't supportable

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 5 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)

			Oh yeah, if you are interested in a discussion of the pros and cons of him being the Cylon god, for which this page is not the place, check out http://ideas.4brad.com/cylon-god-and-hybrid --[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 04:14, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Bradtem: /* Coincidence isn't supportable */

2007-12-05T05:44:00Z

Coincidence isn't supportable

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 5 December 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)
			:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)

OTW at 12:20, 4 December 2007

2007-12-04T12:20:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 4 December 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)
			::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)

Bradtem: /* Coincidence isn't supportable */

2007-12-04T09:08:42Z

Coincidence isn't supportable

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 4 December 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::I'm saying that the Guardians' god isn't necessarily the same as the humanoid Cylons' god. That's one of these assumptions that is just made, instead of leaving all possibilities open.		::::I'm saying that the Guardians' god isn't necessarily the same as the humanoid Cylons' god. That's one of these assumptions that is just made, instead of leaving all possibilities open.
	::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)
			:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)

Serenity at 07:51, 4 December 2007

2007-12-04T07:51:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 4 December 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::The note as it stands now is pointless. I'm removing it. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:53, 3 December 2007 (CST)		::::The note as it stands now is pointless. I'm removing it. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 18:53, 3 December 2007 (CST)
	:::::Pointless? Trust me, RDM doesn't put in lines like the hybrid musing about future existence without a big reason. I think it would be very wrong not to document it, it's one of the most important things revealed about the being! (Ah, I now see you only wanted to delete the part about the chronology wrt Hera)--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 19:00, 3 December 2007 (CST)		:::::Pointless? Trust me, RDM doesn't put in lines like the hybrid musing about future existence without a big reason. I think it would be very wrong not to document it, it's one of the most important things revealed about the being! (Ah, I now see you only wanted to delete the part about the chronology wrt Hera)--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 19:00, 3 December 2007 (CST)

			::::I'm saying that the Guardians' god isn't necessarily the same as the humanoid Cylons' god. That's one of these assumptions that is just made, instead of leaving all possibilities open.
			::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 5 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)		:As far as I can tell, this encyclopedia's purpose '''is''' "a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time", seeing itself as an organized secondary source of information such that discussion and debate can happen elsewhere (see [[Battlestar Wiki:Battlestar Wiki is not a forum]], [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not]]), such as on sites as yours. There is [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] as an outlet for the inevitable questioning on that topic, but currently no other pages of that ilk. You may try creating a similar page speculating upon the Cylon religion, but I guess that might be controversial. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 07:12, 5 December 2007 (CST)
	::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)		::And I do understand the philosophy against filling the wiki with lots of speculation. (Though I think heroeswiki.com does pretty well by having an explicit "fan theories" set of pages, apart from the main pages.) And I might agree with you about the dry recounting (or at least recounting, no reason to make it too dry) but I disagree about the "what seems obvious at the time." Everything people add to the Wiki has some perception of why it's important behind it. (There are some sites with pure transcripts if you prefer that, and they are useful) That's why I think a rule of "only document what the show tells us, and not your speculations" is not a bad rule. However, what I see happening is people overdoing it, and seeking to remove material which, while real and from the show, happens to imply speculations they don't agree with, while keeping or writing material which implies speculations they do agree with. In the example which I brought up, which is here: http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Humanoid_Cylon_speculation&oldid=107966 we had a page which made declarations that "No character who has had children can be a Cylon" and "No character that has a history going back more than 2 years in the colonies can be a Cylon" and the like. I tried to edit the wiki to remove these statements as baseless speculations, and put in what we had really seen (but not the implicit conclusion that even the likes of Tigh and Tyroll could be Cylons), and I was, as you suggest, not taken seriously. But I was watching a lot more closely than most, at least in this case. I think we want people to watch closely, notice clues and document them -- as long as they stick documenting what really is in the show or external sources. So I would never have written "the hybrid downloaded into Hera" (I don't even think that's all that likely) but I did feel appropriate to note that the two events appear close in time. So once again, I am not saying you want speculation, but I think a lot of the stuff of mine that has been removed has gone not because it was speculation, but because it didn't agree with other people's speculations, and not just in the case I cite above.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 15:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)
			:::OK, this discussion is getting to in-depth for an article talk page. Perhaps you would like to create a [[Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank]] proposal to take this further? [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 15:42, 5 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 5 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)

			Oh yeah, if you are interested in a discussion of the pros and cons of him being the Cylon god, for which this page is not the place, check out http://ideas.4brad.com/cylon-god-and-hybrid --[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 04:14, 5 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 5 December 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)
			:::::::Actually, that's kinda my point. I ran up against this wall over questions very much like that. I did suggest that people such as Tigh could be a Cylon, and wanted to document not the speculation that he was (except in the official speculation page,) but the various real clues from the show that pointed to the fact. And it was indeed laughed at, and more to the point strongly resisted. Now I was right, and they were wrong, and it's not of course assured that I won't be wrong and the others right in other situations, but I think anything that keeps out of the Wiki important facts that turn out to be vital to understanding the show is a sign of something going wrong. This show is a mystery, after all, and like a mystery, it's full of clues, and like a mystery people will all have their theories, some crazy, some on target. But perhaps I am alone in thinking an important part of a Wiki like this is to document the clues -- which means yes, the things people with theories think are clues -- and leave out or isolate the theories, and let people come to their own conclusions. Lots of stuff in the show is subtle, and its importance not always clear to all viewers. Am I wrong in assuming that a large fraction of the viewers want to puzzle over the mysteries of the show and want information to help them? Or does everybody want just a dry recounting of what seems obvious at the time? As a discussion of Wiki policy, does it make sense to move this to a different talk page, perhaps?--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 23:44, 4 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 4 December 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)		::::Heck, I'm not even anywhere near convinced that the Cylon God has a physical manifestation, and is not just a belief in a higher being. Although I also dislike any storyline that actually makes him a real being. That would work if it's just a rational kind of machine intelligence (as trite as that idea is), but some mix between fact and supernatural as is sometimes implied both by the show and fans just doesn't fit with the show's style for me. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (CST)
	:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)		:::::Yup, we don't yet know. But the evidence grows more and more compelling, and I think it's worth documenting. We've got RDM saying the main purpose of Razor was to show us the Starbuck prophecy. We've got the line about being a God given prominence in the sneak peak. We've got various lines about the other Hybrids having a channel to the Cylon god. We've got completely unexplained knowledge from this First Hybrid and the others. We've got Selloi getting a communication from the Cylon God which is accurate. We've got other divine beings, the Lords of Kobol who were physical beings. We've got a Lord of Kobol who was jealous and wanted to be elevated above others, who may be the same god the 5 priests/F5 worship. There's more than this. It's a strong case, getting stronger. Follow the link from my talk page for more info if you care to.--[[User:Bradtem\|Bradtem]] 03:08, 4 December 2007 (CST)
			::::::There is an inherent futility to making such predictions. There are literally an ''infinite'' number of different directions that the series could follow, and the one RDM has chosen does not have to be the most logical. Heck, anyone who suggested Tigh could be a Cylon before [[Crossroads, Part II]] would have been laughed at here. We can't have one theory chosen and then the encyclopaedia dotted with arguments to support it (consciously highlighting things which support your theory is really the same thing). It is probably best to consider these issues briefly in [[Razor#Analysis]] or [[Razor#Questions]]. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 06:20, 4 December 2007 (CST)